Study Finds Significant Variability in Accuracy of Marketed COVID-19 Antibody Tests
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 20 Jul 2020 |

Illustration
A new study by a group of international researchers has found significant variability in the accuracy of currently available COVID-19 antibody tests.
Serological diagnostic tests are being increasingly used to provide a broader understanding of COVID-19 incidence and to assess immunity status in the population. The urgent need for the development of serological diagnostic tests in response to the COVID-19 outbreak has compelled regulatory bodies to implement emergency use authorization programs to expedite the commercialization process of these tests. In light of this, independent and robust post-market evaluations of COVID-19 serological tests are needed to confirm manufacturers’ performance claims.
However, there are discrepancies between claimed and actual performance data for serological diagnostic tests on the market. In the study 'COVID-19 Serological Tests: How Well Do They Actually Perform?', the researchers conducted a review of independent studies evaluating the performance of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. The researchers included studies that reported sensitivity and specificity, stage of disease (early, intermediate, or late), the test format (CLIA, ELISA, RDT), and antibody target (IgA, IgG, IgM, or IgG + IgM). If available, the SARS-CoV-2 antigens used for antibody detection were recorded. The studies that did not specify the disease stage of test samples were grouped under the “overall” category and assessed separately. In total, the researchers reviewed performance data on five serological CLIA tests, 15 serological ELISA tests, and 42 serological RDTs currently on the market.
They found significant variability in the accuracy of marketed tests and highlight several lab-based and point-of-care rapid serological tests with high levels of performance. The findings of this review highlight the need for ongoing independent evaluations of commercialized COVID-19 diagnostic tests.
"No single assay can be used for all diagnostic use cases in the COVID-19 response for a country. What works well in one setting may be inappropriate or not accessible for another. As such, access to information on test performance, that is generated independently, greatly assists countries in informed decision-making," said study co-author Robyn Meurant, Executive Director of Health Sciences for NSF International.
"Antibody testing is important to understand the extent of exposure for COVID-19 so it can be effectively monitored and treated. It is important for regional and national governments to continue their coordinated efforts to independently validate antibody test performance and also partner with industry to scale up manufacturing and production capacity," said Ali Ardakani, Founder & Managing Director at Novateur Ventures.
Serological diagnostic tests are being increasingly used to provide a broader understanding of COVID-19 incidence and to assess immunity status in the population. The urgent need for the development of serological diagnostic tests in response to the COVID-19 outbreak has compelled regulatory bodies to implement emergency use authorization programs to expedite the commercialization process of these tests. In light of this, independent and robust post-market evaluations of COVID-19 serological tests are needed to confirm manufacturers’ performance claims.
However, there are discrepancies between claimed and actual performance data for serological diagnostic tests on the market. In the study 'COVID-19 Serological Tests: How Well Do They Actually Perform?', the researchers conducted a review of independent studies evaluating the performance of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. The researchers included studies that reported sensitivity and specificity, stage of disease (early, intermediate, or late), the test format (CLIA, ELISA, RDT), and antibody target (IgA, IgG, IgM, or IgG + IgM). If available, the SARS-CoV-2 antigens used for antibody detection were recorded. The studies that did not specify the disease stage of test samples were grouped under the “overall” category and assessed separately. In total, the researchers reviewed performance data on five serological CLIA tests, 15 serological ELISA tests, and 42 serological RDTs currently on the market.
They found significant variability in the accuracy of marketed tests and highlight several lab-based and point-of-care rapid serological tests with high levels of performance. The findings of this review highlight the need for ongoing independent evaluations of commercialized COVID-19 diagnostic tests.
"No single assay can be used for all diagnostic use cases in the COVID-19 response for a country. What works well in one setting may be inappropriate or not accessible for another. As such, access to information on test performance, that is generated independently, greatly assists countries in informed decision-making," said study co-author Robyn Meurant, Executive Director of Health Sciences for NSF International.
"Antibody testing is important to understand the extent of exposure for COVID-19 so it can be effectively monitored and treated. It is important for regional and national governments to continue their coordinated efforts to independently validate antibody test performance and also partner with industry to scale up manufacturing and production capacity," said Ali Ardakani, Founder & Managing Director at Novateur Ventures.
Latest COVID-19 News
- New Immunosensor Paves Way to Rapid POC Testing for COVID-19 and Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Long COVID Etiologies Found in Acute Infection Blood Samples
- Novel Device Detects COVID-19 Antibodies in Five Minutes
- CRISPR-Powered COVID-19 Test Detects SARS-CoV-2 in 30 Minutes Using Gene Scissors
- Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis Linked to COVID-19
- Novel SARS CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Validated for Diagnostic Accuracy
- New COVID + Flu + R.S.V. Test to Help Prepare for `Tripledemic`
- AI Takes Guesswork Out Of Lateral Flow Testing
- Fastest Ever SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Designed for Non-Invasive COVID-19 Testing in Any Setting
- Rapid Antigen Tests Detect Omicron, Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variants
- Health Care Professionals Showed Increased Interest in POC Technologies During Pandemic, Finds Study
- Set Up Reserve Lab Capacity Now for Faster Response to Next Pandemic, Say Researchers
- Blood Test Performed During Initial Infection Predicts Long COVID Risk
- Low-Cost COVID-19 Testing Platform Combines Sensitivity of PCR and Speed of Antigen Tests
- Finger-Prick Blood Test Identifies Immunity to COVID-19
- Quick Test Kit Determines Immunity Against COVID-19 and Its Variants
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Chemical Imaging Probe Could Track and Treat Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer remains a leading cause of illness and death among men, with many patients eventually developing resistance to standard hormone-blocking therapies. These drugs often lose effectiveness... Read more
Mismatch Between Two Common Kidney Function Tests Indicates Serious Health Problems
Creatinine has long been the standard for measuring kidney filtration, while cystatin C — a protein produced by all human cells — has been recommended as a complementary marker because it is influenced... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Simple Urine Test to Revolutionize Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Bladder cancer is one of the most common and deadly urological cancers and is marked by a high rate of recurrence. Diagnosis and follow-up still rely heavily on invasive cystoscopy or urine cytology, which... Read more
Blood Test to Enable Earlier and Simpler Detection of Liver Fibrosis
Persistent liver damage caused by alcohol misuse or viral infections can trigger liver fibrosis, a condition in which healthy tissue is gradually replaced by collagen fibers. Even after successful treatment... Read moreHematology
view channel
Platelet Activity Blood Test in Middle Age Could Identify Early Alzheimer’s Risk
Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease remains one of the biggest unmet needs in neurology, particularly because the biological changes underlying the disorder begin decades before memory symptoms appear.... Read more
Microvesicles Measurement Could Detect Vascular Injury in Sickle Cell Disease Patients
Assessing disease severity in sickle cell disease (SCD) remains challenging, especially when trying to predict hemolysis, vascular injury, and risk of complications such as vaso-occlusive crises.... Read more
ADLM’s New Coagulation Testing Guidance to Improve Care for Patients on Blood Thinners
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are one of the most common types of blood thinners. Patients take them to prevent a host of complications that could arise from blood clotting, including stroke, deep... Read moreImmunology
view channel
New Test Distinguishes Vaccine-Induced False Positives from Active HIV Infection
Since HIV was identified in 1983, more than 91 million people have contracted the virus, and over 44 million have died from related causes. Today, nearly 40 million individuals worldwide live with HIV-1,... Read more
Gene Signature Test Predicts Response to Key Breast Cancer Treatment
DK4/6 inhibitors paired with hormone therapy have become a cornerstone treatment for advanced HR+/HER2– breast cancer, slowing tumor growth by blocking key proteins that drive cell division.... Read more
Chip Captures Cancer Cells from Blood to Help Select Right Breast Cancer Treatment
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for about a quarter of all breast cancer cases and generally carries a good prognosis. This non-invasive form of the disease may or may not become life-threatening.... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Rapid Diagnostic Test Matches Gold Standard for Sepsis Detection
Sepsis kills 11 million people worldwide every year and generates massive healthcare costs. In the USA and Europe alone, sepsis accounts for USD 100 billion in annual hospitalization expenses.... Read moreRapid POC Tuberculosis Test Provides Results Within 15 Minutes
Tuberculosis remains one of the world’s deadliest infectious diseases, and reducing new cases depends on identifying individuals with latent infection before it progresses. Current diagnostic tools often... Read more
Rapid Assay Identifies Bloodstream Infection Pathogens Directly from Patient Samples
Bloodstream infections in sepsis progress quickly and demand rapid, precise diagnosis. Current blood-culture methods often take one to five days to identify the pathogen, leaving clinicians to treat blindly... Read morePathology
view channel
Tunable Cell-Sorting Device Holds Potential for Multiple Biomedical Applications
Isolating rare cancer cells from blood is essential for diagnosing metastasis and guiding treatment decisions, but remains technically challenging. Many existing techniques struggle to balance accuracy,... Read moreAI Tool Outperforms Doctors in Spotting Blood Cell Abnormalities
Diagnosing blood disorders depends on recognizing subtle abnormalities in cell size, shape, and structure, yet this process is slow, subjective, and requires years of expert training. Even specialists... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Artificial Intelligence Model Could Accelerate Rare Disease Diagnosis
Identifying which genetic variants actually cause disease remains one of the biggest challenges in genomic medicine. Each person carries tens of thousands of DNA changes, yet only a few meaningfully alter... Read more
AI Saliva Sensor Enables Early Detection of Head and Neck Cancer
Early detection of head and neck cancer remains difficult because the disease produces few or no symptoms in its earliest stages, and lesions often lie deep within the head or neck, where biopsy or endoscopy... Read moreIndustry
view channel
Abbott Acquires Cancer-Screening Company Exact Sciences
Abbott (Abbott Park, IL, USA) has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Exact Sciences (Madison, WI, USA), enabling it to enter and lead in fast-growing cancer diagnostics segments.... Read more









