LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Unnecessary Testing for UTIs Significantly Reduced

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 04 Mar 2019
Image: Unnecessary testing for urinary tract infections can be significantly reduced (Photo courtesy of Nicole Wetsman).
Image: Unnecessary testing for urinary tract infections can be significantly reduced (Photo courtesy of Nicole Wetsman).
Tests to detect urinary tract infections (UTI) often are performed routinely in hospitals, even when patients do not have symptoms. Such testing "just to be safe" can return results that lead doctors to prescribe antibiotics when there is little to no evidence to warrant such treatment.

A new study indicates that making a simple change to the electronic system used by doctors to order urine tests can cut by nearly half the number of bacterial culture tests ordered without compromising the ability to identify people who need treatment for UTIs. The change encouraged doctors to first look for signs of a UTI before testing a patient's urine for bacteria.

Medical scientists at the Washington University School of Medicine (St Louis, MO, USA) and their colleagues evaluated the impact of changes to urine testing ordered in computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system on urine culturing practices. The team made two changes to encourage more informative urine testing among their colleagues at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St. Louis, MO, USA).

First, they sent an email to all clinicians explaining the rationale behind ordering a urine dipstick test for signs of infection before ordering a bacterial culture test. Then, they changed the electronic ordering system. They set the default to a urine dipstick test followed by a bacterial culture test, rather than a culture test alone, which had previously been the first option. Clinicians who wished to order a culture test alone could still do so, but they had to open an additional screen on their computers.

The investigators compared all urine culture tests ordered at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in the 15 months before the intervention, staged in April 2016, to the 15 months after. Before the intervention, doctors ordered 15,746 urine cultures, or 38 orders per 1,000 patient-days. After the intervention, they ordered 45% fewer: a total of 8,823, or 21 orders per 1,000 patient-days. In particular, the number of urine cultures from people with catheters, who are at high risk of UTIs, dropped from 7.8 to 1.9 per 1000 patient-days while the number of catheter-associated UTIs did not change at all. There were 125 diagnosed catheter-associated UTIs in each time period.

Since it costs about USD 15 to perform a urine culture, the intervention saved approximately USD 104,000 in laboratory costs alone over the 15-month period. The team was unable to obtain pharmacy records to determine whether more careful testing decreased antibiotic prescriptions, but previous studies have shown that minimizing unwarranted testing does reduce antibiotic overuse.

David K. Warren, MD, a professor of medicine and the senior author of the study, said, “Over-testing for UTIs drives up health-care costs and leads to unnecessary antibiotic use which spreads antibiotic resistance. Ordering tests when the patient needs them is a good thing. But ordering tests when it's not indicated wastes resources and can subject patients to unnecessary treatment. We were able to reduce the number of tests ordered substantially without diminishing the quality of care at all, and at a substantial cost savings.” The study was published on February 21, 2019, in the journal Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.

Related Links:
Washington University School of Medicine
Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Gold Member
Fibrinolysis Assay
HemosIL Fibrinolysis Assay Panel
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
Laboratory Software
ArtelWare
Gold Member
Immunochromatographic Assay
CRYPTO Cassette

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The diagnostic device can tell how deadly brain tumors respond to treatment from a simple blood test (Photo courtesy of UQ)

Diagnostic Device Predicts Treatment Response for Brain Tumors Via Blood Test

Glioblastoma is one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer, largely because doctors have no reliable way to determine whether treatments are working in real time. Assessing therapeutic response currently... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Circulating tumor cells isolated from blood samples could help guide immunotherapy decisions (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

Blood Test Identifies Lung Cancer Patients Who Can Benefit from Immunotherapy Drug

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with limited treatment options, and even newly approved immunotherapies do not benefit all patients. While immunotherapy can extend survival for some,... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Vitestro has shared a detailed visual explanation of its Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device (photo courtesy of Vitestro)

Robotic Technology Unveiled for Automated Diagnostic Blood Draws

Routine diagnostic blood collection is a high‑volume task that can strain staffing and introduce human‑dependent variability, with downstream implications for sample quality and patient experience.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: Roche’s cobas® Mass Spec solution enables fully automated mass spectrometry in routine clinical laboratories (Photo courtesy of Roche)

New Collaboration Brings Automated Mass Spectrometry to Routine Laboratory Testing

Mass spectrometry is a powerful analytical technique that identifies and quantifies molecules based on their mass and electrical charge. Its high selectivity, sensitivity, and accuracy make it indispensable... Read more