Immune Analysis of Biopsies Predicts Response to Melanoma Immunotherapy
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 01 Sep 2016 |

Image: A malignant melanoma on a patient’s skin (Photo courtesy of the National Cancer Institute).
Immune response measured in tumor biopsies during the course of early treatment predicts which melanoma patients will benefit from specific immune checkpoint blockade drugs.
Immune checkpoint blockade represents a major breakthrough in cancer therapy; however, responses are not universal. Genomic and immune features in pretreatment tumor biopsies have been reported to correlate with response in patients with melanoma and other cancers, but robust biomarkers have not been identified.
A large team of scientists at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) assembled a cohort of longitudinal tumor samples from patients and analyzed each biopsy for gene expression and the presence of certain types of T cell and protein markers such as expression of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1, the ligand found on tumor and other cells that activates PD-1. They studied a cohort of 53 patients with metastatic melanoma initially treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) blockade followed by 46 patients treated with PD-1 blockade at progression and analyzed immune signatures in longitudinal tissue samples collected at multiple time points during therapy.
Patients were treated with the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab followed by biopsies, when feasible, after the second or third treatment and at progression. Seven (13%) of 53 patients had a clinical benefit, defined as either absence of disease, tumor shrinkage or stable disease for at least six months. There were no immune biomarker differences between responders and non-responders before treatment. After treatment began, the presence of killer T cells was significantly higher in the tumors of responders. The remaining 46 patients proceeded to treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembroluzimab and 13 (28%) of the 46 responded. Before treatment, three immune markers were slightly elevated in responders compared to non-responders, but values overlapped the two groups.
As with the immune profiling, the gene expression panel turned up significant differences between responders and non-responders only at the on-treatment biopsy for anti-PD1. Significant differences were found in 411 differentially expressed genes in responders. Most differences involved increased expression in the responding patients of genes involved in immune response. Only six genes were lower in responders, including the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA), which is involved in the generation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis.
Jennifer A. Wargo, MD, an associate professor of Genomic Medicine and Surgical Oncology and the senior author of the study, said, “Before treatment, analyzing samples with a 12-marker immune panel or a 795-gene expression panel, you can't tell who will respond with any degree of certainty. On treatment, there were night-and-day differences between responders and non-responders. Therefore we could start by treating with anti-PD1, do an early on-treatment biopsy and, based on that, either continue or add ipilimumab or another agent.” The study was published on August 1, 2016, in the journal Cancer Discovery.
Related Links:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Immune checkpoint blockade represents a major breakthrough in cancer therapy; however, responses are not universal. Genomic and immune features in pretreatment tumor biopsies have been reported to correlate with response in patients with melanoma and other cancers, but robust biomarkers have not been identified.
A large team of scientists at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) assembled a cohort of longitudinal tumor samples from patients and analyzed each biopsy for gene expression and the presence of certain types of T cell and protein markers such as expression of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1, the ligand found on tumor and other cells that activates PD-1. They studied a cohort of 53 patients with metastatic melanoma initially treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) blockade followed by 46 patients treated with PD-1 blockade at progression and analyzed immune signatures in longitudinal tissue samples collected at multiple time points during therapy.
Patients were treated with the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab followed by biopsies, when feasible, after the second or third treatment and at progression. Seven (13%) of 53 patients had a clinical benefit, defined as either absence of disease, tumor shrinkage or stable disease for at least six months. There were no immune biomarker differences between responders and non-responders before treatment. After treatment began, the presence of killer T cells was significantly higher in the tumors of responders. The remaining 46 patients proceeded to treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembroluzimab and 13 (28%) of the 46 responded. Before treatment, three immune markers were slightly elevated in responders compared to non-responders, but values overlapped the two groups.
As with the immune profiling, the gene expression panel turned up significant differences between responders and non-responders only at the on-treatment biopsy for anti-PD1. Significant differences were found in 411 differentially expressed genes in responders. Most differences involved increased expression in the responding patients of genes involved in immune response. Only six genes were lower in responders, including the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA), which is involved in the generation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis.
Jennifer A. Wargo, MD, an associate professor of Genomic Medicine and Surgical Oncology and the senior author of the study, said, “Before treatment, analyzing samples with a 12-marker immune panel or a 795-gene expression panel, you can't tell who will respond with any degree of certainty. On treatment, there were night-and-day differences between responders and non-responders. Therefore we could start by treating with anti-PD1, do an early on-treatment biopsy and, based on that, either continue or add ipilimumab or another agent.” The study was published on August 1, 2016, in the journal Cancer Discovery.
Related Links:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Diagnostic Device Predicts Treatment Response for Brain Tumors Via Blood Test
- Blood Test Detects Early-Stage Cancers by Measuring Epigenetic Instability
- Two-in-One DNA Analysis Improves Diagnostic Accuracy While Saving Time and Costs
- “Lab-On-A-Disc” Device Paves Way for More Automated Liquid Biopsies
- New Tool Maps Chromosome Shifts in Cancer Cells to Predict Tumor Evolution
- Blood Test Identifies Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients at Increased Risk of Brain Metastasis
- Newly-Identified Parkinson’s Biomarkers to Enable Early Diagnosis Via Blood Tests
- New Blood Test Could Detect Pancreatic Cancer at More Treatable Stage
- Liquid Biopsy Could Replace Surgical Biopsy for Diagnosing Primary Central Nervous Lymphoma
- New Tool Reveals Hidden Metabolic Weakness in Blood Cancers
- World's First Blood Test Distinguishes Between Benign and Cancerous Lung Nodules
- Rapid Test Uses Mobile Phone to Identify Severe Imported Malaria Within Minutes
- Gut Microbiome Signatures Predict Long-Term Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis
- Blood Test Promises Faster Answers for Deadly Fungal Infections
- Blood Test Could Detect Infection Exposure History
- Urine-Based MRD Test Tracks Response to Bladder Cancer Surgery
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
New PSA-Based Prognostic Model Improves Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment
Prostate cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death among American men, and about one in eight will be diagnosed in their lifetime. Screening relies on blood levels of prostate-specific antigen... Read more
Extracellular Vesicles Linked to Heart Failure Risk in CKD Patients
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects more than 1 in 7 Americans and is strongly associated with cardiovascular complications, which account for more than half of deaths among people with CKD.... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Diagnostic Device Predicts Treatment Response for Brain Tumors Via Blood Test
Glioblastoma is one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer, largely because doctors have no reliable way to determine whether treatments are working in real time. Assessing therapeutic response currently... Read more
Blood Test Detects Early-Stage Cancers by Measuring Epigenetic Instability
Early-stage cancers are notoriously difficult to detect because molecular changes are subtle and often missed by existing screening tools. Many liquid biopsies rely on measuring absolute DNA methylation... Read more
“Lab-On-A-Disc” Device Paves Way for More Automated Liquid Biopsies
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are tiny particles released by cells into the bloodstream that carry molecular information about a cell’s condition, including whether it is cancerous. However, EVs are highly... Read more
Blood Test Identifies Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients at Increased Risk of Brain Metastasis
Brain metastasis is a frequent and devastating complication in patients with inflammatory breast cancer, an aggressive subtype with limited treatment options. Despite its high incidence, the biological... Read moreHematology
view channel
New Guidelines Aim to Improve AL Amyloidosis Diagnosis
Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, life-threatening bone marrow disorder in which abnormal amyloid proteins accumulate in organs. Approximately 3,260 people in the United States are diagnosed... Read more
Fast and Easy Test Could Revolutionize Blood Transfusions
Blood transfusions are a cornerstone of modern medicine, yet red blood cells can deteriorate quietly while sitting in cold storage for weeks. Although blood units have a fixed expiration date, cells from... Read more
Automated Hemostasis System Helps Labs of All Sizes Optimize Workflow
High-volume hemostasis sections must sustain rapid turnaround while managing reruns and reflex testing. Manual tube handling and preanalytical checks can strain staff time and increase opportunities for error.... Read more
High-Sensitivity Blood Test Improves Assessment of Clotting Risk in Heart Disease Patients
Blood clotting is essential for preventing bleeding, but even small imbalances can lead to serious conditions such as thrombosis or dangerous hemorrhage. In cardiovascular disease, clinicians often struggle... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Comprehensive Review Identifies Gut Microbiome Signatures Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease
Alzheimer’s disease affects approximately 6.7 million people in the United States and nearly 50 million worldwide, yet early cognitive decline remains difficult to characterize. Increasing evidence suggests... Read moreAI-Powered Platform Enables Rapid Detection of Drug-Resistant C. Auris Pathogens
Infections caused by the pathogenic yeast Candida auris pose a significant threat to hospitalized patients, particularly those with weakened immune systems or those who have invasive medical devices.... Read morePathology
view channel
Engineered Yeast Cells Enable Rapid Testing of Cancer Immunotherapy
Developing new cancer immunotherapies is a slow, costly, and high-risk process, particularly for CAR T cell treatments that must precisely recognize cancer-specific antigens. Small differences in tumor... Read more
First-Of-Its-Kind Test Identifies Autism Risk at Birth
Autism spectrum disorder is treatable, and extensive research shows that early intervention can significantly improve cognitive, social, and behavioral outcomes. Yet in the United States, the average age... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Robotic Technology Unveiled for Automated Diagnostic Blood Draws
Routine diagnostic blood collection is a high‑volume task that can strain staffing and introduce human‑dependent variability, with downstream implications for sample quality and patient experience.... Read more
ADLM Launches First-of-Its-Kind Data Science Program for Laboratory Medicine Professionals
Clinical laboratories generate billions of test results each year, creating a treasure trove of data with the potential to support more personalized testing, improve operational efficiency, and enhance patient care.... Read moreAptamer Biosensor Technology to Transform Virus Detection
Rapid and reliable virus detection is essential for controlling outbreaks, from seasonal influenza to global pandemics such as COVID-19. Conventional diagnostic methods, including cell culture, antigen... Read more
AI Models Could Predict Pre-Eclampsia and Anemia Earlier Using Routine Blood Tests
Pre-eclampsia and anemia are major contributors to maternal and child mortality worldwide, together accounting for more than half a million deaths each year and leaving millions with long-term health complications.... Read moreIndustry
view channelNew Collaboration Brings Automated Mass Spectrometry to Routine Laboratory Testing
Mass spectrometry is a powerful analytical technique that identifies and quantifies molecules based on their mass and electrical charge. Its high selectivity, sensitivity, and accuracy make it indispensable... Read more
AI-Powered Cervical Cancer Test Set for Major Rollout in Latin America
Noul Co., a Korean company specializing in AI-based blood and cancer diagnostics, announced it will supply its intelligence (AI)-based miLab CER cervical cancer diagnostic solution to Mexico under a multi‑year... Read more
Diasorin and Fisher Scientific Enter into US Distribution Agreement for Molecular POC Platform
Diasorin (Saluggia, Italy) has entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with Fisher Scientific, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), for the LIAISON NES molecular point-of-care... Read more







