LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Overtesting for Diabetes Tends to Reap Negative “Rewards”

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 23 Dec 2015
Caption: A new study has shown that there is a US national trend toward overtesting in adult patients with Type 2 diabetes and that excessive testing increased the odds of overtreatment with one or more drugs (Image courtesy of Mayo Clinic).
Caption: A new study has shown that there is a US national trend toward overtesting in adult patients with Type 2 diabetes and that excessive testing increased the odds of overtreatment with one or more drugs (Image courtesy of Mayo Clinic).
Researchers report a US national trend toward overtesting of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in adult patients with Type 2 diabetes, leading to unnecessary cost, time, and other burdens for patients and providers, as well as potential patient health complications due to overtreatment with hypoglycemic drugs.

A new study led by Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) researchers has shown that patients with Type 2 diabetes are often tested much more frequently than clinically indicated. Type 2 diabetes monitoring and treatment protocols are not well defined by professional societies and regulatory bodies. While lower thresholds of testing frequencies are often discussed, the upper boundaries are rarely mentioned. Yet, most agree that checking 1–2 times/year should suffice for adult patients who are not using insulin, have stable glycemic control within the recommended targets, and have no history of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Yet, in practice, there is a much higher prevalence of excessive testing.

Upon examining a national cohort of 31,545 non-pregnant adults with controlled non-insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes, the investigators said the study provides definitive evidence of such excess testing. The patient cohort examined was derived from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) using de-identified administrative, pharmacy, and laboratory data from 2001 to 2011. Approximately 55% achieved and maintained the recommended less than 7% HbA1c level and were tested 3–4 times/year; 6% were tested 5 or more times.

“Our findings are concerning, especially as we focus more on improving the value of care we deliver to our patients—not only ensuring maximal benefit, but also being mindful of waste, patient burden, and healthcare costs,” said study lead investigator Rozalina McCoy, MD, Mayo Clinic, “As providers, we must be ever vigilant.”

“Potential reasons for more frequent testing include clinical uncertainty; misunderstanding of the nature of the test—that is, not realizing that HbA1c represents a 3-month average of glycemic control; or a desire for diagnostic and management thoroughness,” said Dr. McCoy, “Other times, it may be the result of fragmentation of care (more than one unconnected provider); the need to fulfill regulatory demands, such as public reporting of performance metrics; or internal tracking of performance. “Because our culture often thinks that more is better” patients and providers may favor additional testing due to a desire for comprehensive care, she added.

The researchers also found that excessive testing increased the odds of overtreatment with one or more drugs, despite normal HbA1c levels, and that rates of overtesting were lower among patients receiving bundled testing (i.e., cholesterol, creatinine, and HbA1c tests in the same day).

“We hope that these findings will help inform decision-making,” said Dr. McCoy.

The study was published December 8, 2015, in the British Journal of Medicine.

Related Links:

Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
OptumLabs 


New
Gold Member
Clinical Drug Testing Panel
DOA Urine MultiPlex
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
Automated MALDI-TOF MS System
EXS 3000
New
Gold Member
Genetic Type 1 Diabetes Risk Test
T1D GRS Array

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The diagnostic device can tell how deadly brain tumors respond to treatment from a simple blood test (Photo courtesy of UQ)

Diagnostic Device Predicts Treatment Response for Brain Tumors Via Blood Test

Glioblastoma is one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer, largely because doctors have no reliable way to determine whether treatments are working in real time. Assessing therapeutic response currently... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Circulating tumor cells isolated from blood samples could help guide immunotherapy decisions (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

Blood Test Identifies Lung Cancer Patients Who Can Benefit from Immunotherapy Drug

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with limited treatment options, and even newly approved immunotherapies do not benefit all patients. While immunotherapy can extend survival for some,... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: New evidence suggests that imbalances in the gut microbiome may contribute to the onset and progression of MCI and Alzheimer’s disease (Photo courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Comprehensive Review Identifies Gut Microbiome Signatures Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease affects approximately 6.7 million people in the United States and nearly 50 million worldwide, yet early cognitive decline remains difficult to characterize. Increasing evidence suggests... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Vitestro has shared a detailed visual explanation of its Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device (photo courtesy of Vitestro)

Robotic Technology Unveiled for Automated Diagnostic Blood Draws

Routine diagnostic blood collection is a high‑volume task that can strain staffing and introduce human‑dependent variability, with downstream implications for sample quality and patient experience.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: Roche’s cobas® Mass Spec solution enables fully automated mass spectrometry in routine clinical laboratories (Photo courtesy of Roche)

New Collaboration Brings Automated Mass Spectrometry to Routine Laboratory Testing

Mass spectrometry is a powerful analytical technique that identifies and quantifies molecules based on their mass and electrical charge. Its high selectivity, sensitivity, and accuracy make it indispensable... Read more