Nanoparticle-Bound Paclitaxel Outperforms Abraxane in Mouse Cancer Models
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Aug 2015 |

Image: Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of the newly repackaged pharmaceutical. The dark spots are the water-insoluble cores of the nanoparticles, while the peptide chains are barely visible due to their low electron density and high degree of hydration (Photo courtesy of Dr. Ashutosh Chilkoti, Duke University).
A novel formulation that intercalated the toxic cancer drug paclitaxel within inert nanoparticles increased the potency of the drug in mouse models while reducing the severity of its adverse side effects.
Investigators at Duke University (Durham, NC, USA) were looking for a form of the chemotherapeutic drug paclitaxel that would perform better than today's preferred formulation known as Abraxane. Abraxane, also called nab-paclitaxel, is a formulation where paclitaxel is bound to albumin nanoparticles. Much of the clinical toxicity of regular paclitaxel is associated with the solvent Cremophor EL in which it is dissolved for delivery. In Abraxane paclitaxel is bonded to albumin as an alternative delivery agent to the more toxic solvent delivery method. This formulation was approved by the [US] Food and Drug Administration (Bethesda, MD, USA) in January 2005 for the treatment of breast cancer after failure of combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease or relapse within six months of adjuvant chemotherapy
The investigators worked with two mouse models: the first group of mice had human breast cancers growing in their own mammary glands, while the second group of mice had human prostate tumors growing under their skin. Both groups were treated with Abraxane or with a new formulation.
In this formation paclitaxel was conjugated to recombinant chimeric polypeptides (CPs) that spontaneously self-assembled into approximately 60 nanometer near-monodisperse nanoparticles that increased the systemic exposure of paclitaxel by sevenfold compared with the free drug and twofold compared with Abraxane. The tumor uptake of the nanoparticles was fivefold greater than the free drug and twofold greater than Abraxane.
Results published in the August 4, 2015, online edition of the journal Nature Communications revealed that in the mouse cancer models of human triple-negative breast cancer and prostate cancer, the paclitaxel nanoparticles induced near-complete tumor regression after a single dose in both tumor models, whereas at the same dose, no mice treated with Abraxane survived for more than 80 days (breast cancer) or 60 days (prostate cancer), respectively.
"The chemical bonds holding the polypeptide cage together are stable in blood, but dissolve in a tumor's lower pH levels," said first author Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharyya, a senior research scientist at Duke University. "This delivers the drug directly to the tumor and helps prevent it from randomly absorbing into healthy tissue, reducing side effects."
Related Links:
Duke University
[US] Food and Drug Administration
Investigators at Duke University (Durham, NC, USA) were looking for a form of the chemotherapeutic drug paclitaxel that would perform better than today's preferred formulation known as Abraxane. Abraxane, also called nab-paclitaxel, is a formulation where paclitaxel is bound to albumin nanoparticles. Much of the clinical toxicity of regular paclitaxel is associated with the solvent Cremophor EL in which it is dissolved for delivery. In Abraxane paclitaxel is bonded to albumin as an alternative delivery agent to the more toxic solvent delivery method. This formulation was approved by the [US] Food and Drug Administration (Bethesda, MD, USA) in January 2005 for the treatment of breast cancer after failure of combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease or relapse within six months of adjuvant chemotherapy
The investigators worked with two mouse models: the first group of mice had human breast cancers growing in their own mammary glands, while the second group of mice had human prostate tumors growing under their skin. Both groups were treated with Abraxane or with a new formulation.
In this formation paclitaxel was conjugated to recombinant chimeric polypeptides (CPs) that spontaneously self-assembled into approximately 60 nanometer near-monodisperse nanoparticles that increased the systemic exposure of paclitaxel by sevenfold compared with the free drug and twofold compared with Abraxane. The tumor uptake of the nanoparticles was fivefold greater than the free drug and twofold greater than Abraxane.
Results published in the August 4, 2015, online edition of the journal Nature Communications revealed that in the mouse cancer models of human triple-negative breast cancer and prostate cancer, the paclitaxel nanoparticles induced near-complete tumor regression after a single dose in both tumor models, whereas at the same dose, no mice treated with Abraxane survived for more than 80 days (breast cancer) or 60 days (prostate cancer), respectively.
"The chemical bonds holding the polypeptide cage together are stable in blood, but dissolve in a tumor's lower pH levels," said first author Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharyya, a senior research scientist at Duke University. "This delivers the drug directly to the tumor and helps prevent it from randomly absorbing into healthy tissue, reducing side effects."
Related Links:
Duke University
[US] Food and Drug Administration
Latest BioResearch News
- Microtubule Protein Drives Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer
- Gene Variants Linked to Pollution-Exacerbated Asthma
- Single-Cell Analysis Mapping Links Inflammation Response to Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Study Reveals New Insights into Rare Blood Cancer Development
- New Findings Clarify Molecular Drivers of Rare Small Intestinal Cancer
- Lung Cancer Study Reveals Cellular Program Behind Therapy Resistance
- Tumor Genome Marker May Predict Treatment Benefit in Pediatric Cancers
- Lysosomal Gene Defect Linked to Severe Childhood Brain Disorders
- Genetic Testing Identifies Greater Inherited Sudden Cardiac Arrest Risk in Younger Individuals
- Hidden 'Jumping Gene' Variant Linked to Higher Pancreatic Cancer Risk
- Common White Blood Cells Produce Schizophrenia-Linked Protein
- Nanopore Method Captures RNA Folding at Single-Molecule Resolution
- Tumor Microenvironment Marker Linked to Worse Survival in Solid Tumors
- Hidden Immune Gene Defect May Explain Kaposi Sarcoma Susceptibility
- Genetic Markers May Help Predict Amputation Risk in Peripheral Artery Disease
- Gene Signature Shows Promise for Depression Biomarker Testing
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
FDA-Approved Test Identifies Low Risk of Large Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis
Chronic liver disease contributes substantially to mortality, and clinicians routinely screen adults with compensated cirrhosis for varices to prevent bleeding. However, endoscopy is invasive and reso... Read more
Blood Protein Signature Diagnoses Pediatric IBD and Distinguishes Subtypes
Confirming pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires imaging, endoscopy, and histopathology, prolonging time to diagnosis. Reliable, noninvasive blood tests remain an unmet need in routine... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Model Predicts Increased ALS Clinic Visits with Expanded Genetic Testing
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that rapidly impairs motor function and shortens survival, creating sustained demand for multidisciplinary care.... Read more
Genomic Assays Predict Anthracycline Benefit in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for early-stage, hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer, but its risks of cardiotoxicity... Read moreHematology
view channel
Next-Generation Hematology Platform Streamlines High-Complexity Lab Workflows
Sysmex America (Chicago, IL, USA) has introduced the next generation XR-Series, centered on the XR-10 Automated Hematology Module for high-complexity laboratories. The platform builds on the widely used... Read more
Blood Eosinophil Count May Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response and Toxicity
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes across many cancers, yet only a subset of patients derive durable benefit and biomarkers to guide treatment remain limited. Eosinophils, best known for... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Emergency Department Opt-Out Testing Program Identifies Undiagnosed HIV
Undiagnosed HIV continues to drive avoidable morbidity and transmission, with many people identified only after substantial immune damage has occurred. In England, about one in 20 people living with HIV... Read more
Immune Biomarkers Could Identify Risk of Chronic Critical Illness on ICU Admission
Severe traumatic injury can trigger immune and organ dysfunction that complicates recovery in the intensive care unit. A subset of patients develop chronic critical illness, defined as dependence on intensive... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
H. pylori Screening Within Colorectal Program Aids Gastric Cancer Prevention
Health systems increasingly rely on economic evidence to guide cancer prevention strategies. For gastric cancer, selecting screening approaches that can integrate with existing programs is a key policy question.... Read more
Machine Learning Reveals Consistent Gut Microbiome Patterns in Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer has been repeatedly linked to alterations in the gut microbiome, yet findings have often varied across small, heterogeneous studies. Reproducibility has been limited by differing sequencing... Read morePathology
view channel
Uncertainty-Aware AI Tool Improves Digital Pathology for Cancer Subtyping
Reliable histologic subtyping guides therapy selection in oncology, yet diagnostic workflows grow more complex as whole-slide imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) expand. A persistent obstacle to clinical... Read more
Study Highlights Biomarker Testing Delays in Lung Cancer Care
Timely biomarker results are critical to match lung cancer patients with targeted therapies or immunotherapies, yet many clinical pathways still delay testing after biopsy. Ordering responsibility, reimbursement... Read moreTechnology
view channel
AI Platform Links Biomarker Results to Cancer Clinical Trials and Guidelines
Oncology teams must manage growing volumes of genomic data, rapidly evolving clinical trial options, and frequently updated care guidelines, all within tight clinic schedules. Translating complex tumor... Read more
Agentic AI Platform Supports Genomic Decision-Making in Oncology
Oncology care teams increasingly face the challenge of managing complex molecular diagnostics, evolving treatment options, and extensive electronic health record documentation. Translating multimodal data... Read moreIndustry
view channel








