We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Novel Blood Test Differentiates Celiac from Gluten Sensitivity

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 24 Nov 2017
Image: A diagram comparing the small intestine in Celiac disease with damaged villi and a normal bowel (Photo courtesy of the Mayo Clinic).
Image: A diagram comparing the small intestine in Celiac disease with damaged villi and a normal bowel (Photo courtesy of the Mayo Clinic).
The measurement of circulating cytokines in blood plasma within six hours of eating gluten differentiated patients with celiac disease from those with non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

Investigators found that a one-off oral gluten challenge caused an increase in interleukin (IL)-8, IL-10 and especially IL-2 in patients with celiac disease. Conversely, patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity showed no measurable immune response to gluten, but did show a symptom response to Fermentable, Oligo-, Di-, Mono-saccharides and Polyols (FODMAPs), specifically fructans.

Scientists at the University of Oslo (Norway) collaborating with those at ImmusanT (Cambridge, MA, USA) evaluated whether cytokine responses could distinguish between patients with celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity on a gluten-free diet. They evaluated IL-2, IL-8 and IL-10 plasma levels in 19 patients with celiac disease and 49 patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity that underwent parallel food challenges. They drew blood samples before and 2, 4 and 6 hours after patients consumed breakfast bars containing gluten, FODMAP or placebo free of these ingredients.

Overall, the gluten-containing bars triggered mucosal changes in five of the patients with celiac disease, and induced a T-cell response in 12 of the 15 assessed. In contrast, the gluten-containing bars triggered no symptomatic response versus placebo in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Rather, these patients showed significantly higher irritable bowel syndrome symptom scores and bloating after consuming the FODMAP versus gluten bars. The team found that found that patients with celiac disease showed significant increases in IL-2 levels after consuming the gluten bars compared with non-celiac gluten sensitivity patients. At two hours the median elevations were 1.2-fold higher at four hours they were 10 times higher and at six hours they were 3.6 times higher.

Celiac patients also showed significantly higher increases in IL-8 and IL-10 relative to those with non-celiac gluten sensitivity at both four and six hours, but the median elevations were just between 1.2 to 1.8 times higher. Using optimized cutoffs, IL-2 identified celiac patients with 74% sensitivity and 98% specificity, while IL-8 performed with 42% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and IL-10 performed with 32% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Robert P. Anderson, BMedSci, MB, ChB, PhD, FRACP, ImmusanT’s chief scientific officer, said, “It turns out that the people with celiac disease had an immune activation signature that we could measure in blood, and consistent with our previous study, this pointed to a T-cell effect, with gluten stimulating T-cells very quickly within 2 to 4 hours. But there was absolutely nothing that we could measure showing any form of immune activation in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which was surprising, because the immune activation in this condition is thought to be caused by the innate immune system releasing markers like IL-8.” The study was presented at the United European Gastroenterology Week 2017 held October 28 – November 1, in Barcelona, Spain.

Related Links:
University of Oslo
ImmusanT

Gold Member
Blood Gas Analyzer
Stat Profile pHOx
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
Human Estradiol Assay
Human Estradiol CLIA Kit
Hemodynamic System Monitor
OptoMonitor

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The diagnostic device can tell how deadly brain tumors respond to treatment from a simple blood test (Photo courtesy of UQ)

Diagnostic Device Predicts Treatment Response for Brain Tumors Via Blood Test

Glioblastoma is one of the deadliest forms of brain cancer, largely because doctors have no reliable way to determine whether treatments are working in real time. Assessing therapeutic response currently... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: New evidence suggests that imbalances in the gut microbiome may contribute to the onset and progression of MCI and Alzheimer’s disease (Photo courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Comprehensive Review Identifies Gut Microbiome Signatures Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease affects approximately 6.7 million people in the United States and nearly 50 million worldwide, yet early cognitive decline remains difficult to characterize. Increasing evidence suggests... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Vitestro has shared a detailed visual explanation of its Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device (photo courtesy of Vitestro)

Robotic Technology Unveiled for Automated Diagnostic Blood Draws

Routine diagnostic blood collection is a high‑volume task that can strain staffing and introduce human‑dependent variability, with downstream implications for sample quality and patient experience.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: Roche’s cobas® Mass Spec solution enables fully automated mass spectrometry in routine clinical laboratories (Photo courtesy of Roche)

New Collaboration Brings Automated Mass Spectrometry to Routine Laboratory Testing

Mass spectrometry is a powerful analytical technique that identifies and quantifies molecules based on their mass and electrical charge. Its high selectivity, sensitivity, and accuracy make it indispensable... Read more