We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Epigenetic Markers Predict Type 2 Diabetes Patients Response to Metformin

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 29 Sep 2020
Print article
Image: Various types of data analysis using BeadStudio Methylation Module with Illumina`s MethylationEpic array (Photo courtesy of Phoebe Lu).
Image: Various types of data analysis using BeadStudio Methylation Module with Illumina`s MethylationEpic array (Photo courtesy of Phoebe Lu).
Generally, metformin is the first medication prescribed for type 2 diabetes (T2D). It works by lowering glucose production in the liver and improving the body's sensitivity to insulin so that the body uses insulin more effectively. Currently, there are no phenotypes that successfully predict glycemic response to, or tolerance of, metformin.

About 30% of patients do not respond to metformin and between 20% and 30% experience side effects that can be intolerable Gastrointestinal side effects of metformin are observed in 10% to 15% of patients, depending on the dose, and include abdominal discomfort, anorexia, bloating, and diarrhea. Because insulin secretion is unaltered, hypoglycemia is not a side effect of metformin used as monotherapy.

An international team of clinical scientists led by those at Skåne University Hospital (Malmo, Sweden) conducted multiple epigenome-wide association studies by analyzing in the blood of drug-naïve patients who were recently diagnosed with T2D. Blood samples were collected from the All New Diabetics In Scandia (ANDIS) cohort and analyzed using Illumina's MethylationEpic array (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The team sought to gauge whether differences in DNA methylation prior to treatment could predict whether individuals had changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), responded to the drug treatment, or experienced intolerance to the drug following about a year and a half of metformin treatment.

The investigators identified more than 2,500 methylation sites that were significantly associated with changes in HbA1c, a marker of blood glucose levels. In the replication cohort, 132 CpGs of these sites were validated. They additionally uncovered 7,916 methylation sites that differed between individuals with T2D who responded to metformin and individuals who did not. Of those, 601 were then validated in the ANDIS replication cohort and 329 in an additional cohorts.

In all, 33 CpG sites were associated with future metformin response in all cohorts, and in a combined meta-analysis 11 sites reached genome-wide significance. At the same time, the team found 9,676 methylation sites that differed between individuals with T2D who could tolerate metformin treatment and those who could not. In the ANDIS replication cohort, 235 CpGs were validated, and in the replication cohort, 352 CpGs were. Seven CpGs were associated with metformin in all cohorts, and in a combined meta-analysis four sites reached genome-wide significance.

The scientists generated two methylation risk scores, one of metformin response and one of metformin intolerance. For the metformin response, they bundled together the 11 sites to form a weighted methylation risk score that could differentiate between responders and non-responders with an area under the curve of between 0.80 and 0.89. Meanwhile, for metformin intolerance, they combined the four sites that reached genome-wide significance into a separate risk score that could differentiate between tolerant and intolerant individuals with an area under the curve of between 0.85 and 0.94.

The authors concludes that they could discriminate between glycemic responders/non-responders and participants tolerant/intolerant to metformin at diagnosis by measuring blood-based epigenetic markers in drug-naïve patients with T2D. This epigenetics-based tool may be further developed to help patients with T2D receive optimal therapy. The study was published on September 16, 2020 in the journal Science Translational Medicine.


Gold Member
Serological Pipet Controller
PIPETBOY GENIUS
Verification Panels for Assay Development & QC
Seroconversion Panels
New
Bordetella Pertussis Molecular Assay
Alethia Pertussis
New
Silver Member
ACTH Assay
ACTH ELISA

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The study demonstrated that electric-field molecular fingerprinting can probe cancer (Photo courtesy of ACS Central Science, 2025, 10.1021/acscentsci.4c02164)

New Method Uses Pulsed Infrared Light to Find Cancer's 'Fingerprints' In Blood Plasma

Cancer diagnoses have traditionally relied on invasive or time-consuming procedures like tissue biopsies. Now, new research published in ACS Central Science introduces a method that utilizes pulsed infrared... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: The cancer stem cell test can accurately choose more effective treatments (Photo courtesy of University of Cincinnati)

Stem Cell Test Predicts Treatment Outcome for Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer frequently responds to chemotherapy initially, but eventually, the tumor develops resistance to the therapy, leading to regrowth. This resistance is partially due to the activation... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The lab-in-tube assay could improve TB diagnoses in rural or resource-limited areas (Photo courtesy of Kenny Lass/Tulane University)

Handheld Device Delivers Low-Cost TB Results in Less Than One Hour

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the deadliest infectious disease globally, affecting an estimated 10 million people annually. In 2021, about 4.2 million TB cases went undiagnosed or unreported, mainly due to... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Schematic illustration of the chip (Photo courtesy of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2025.117401)

Pain-On-A-Chip Microfluidic Device Determines Types of Chronic Pain from Blood Samples

Chronic pain is a widespread condition that remains difficult to manage, and existing clinical methods for its treatment rely largely on self-reporting, which can be subjective and especially problematic... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: The collaboration aims to leverage Oxford Nanopore\'s sequencing platform and Cepheid\'s GeneXpert system to advance the field of sequencing for infectious diseases (Photo courtesy of Cepheid)

Cepheid and Oxford Nanopore Technologies Partner on Advancing Automated Sequencing-Based Solutions

Cepheid (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), a leading molecular diagnostics company, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, UK), the company behind a new generation of sequencing-based molecular analysis technologies,... Read more
Sekisui Diagnostics UK Ltd.