LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

ACTH Stimulation Test Results Reassessed

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 12 May 2018
Print article
Image: A diagram of types of adrenal insufficiency; CRH: corticotropin-releasing hormone, ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone (Photo courtesy of US National Institute of Health).
Image: A diagram of types of adrenal insufficiency; CRH: corticotropin-releasing hormone, ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone (Photo courtesy of US National Institute of Health).
Cosyntropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone or ACTH) stimulation testing is considered the gold standard for investigating primary adrenal insufficiency (AI) and may be an effective alternative to insulin tolerance testing in the workup of secondary AI.

The time of day that ACTH stimulation testing takes place does not affect the percentages of failed, borderline, or passed results in the evaluation of AI. However, testing sites also have different practices about the time of day (morning versus afternoon) that ACTH testing takes place.

Scientists at Dalhousie University (Saint John, NB, Canada) conducted a retrospective study of all ACTH testing performed during a 10-year period to assess whether both 30- and 60-minute results are necessary and whether the timing of testing affects outcomes. In all, there were 431 ACTH stimulation tests; the team excluded 92 due to medications the patients were taking or because the patients had already been diagnosed with primary AI.

The cutoff for ACTH testing was 18 mcg/dL (500 nmol/L) with a test “fail” if both 30- and 60-minute results were below this level, a “borderline pass” if either a 30- or 60-minute value was below the cutoff, and a pass if results at both time frames were above the cutoff. The investigators considered the time of day in three blocks of time: early morning (between 08.00 and 10.00); late morning (between 10:01. and 12:00); and afternoon (after 12:00).

The scientists found that there were no differences at the different time intervals in mean cortisol levels at 30 (574.5, 559, 534 nmol/L, respectively) and 60 minutes (642, 623, 619 nmol/L, respectively) between groups. When comparing 30- versus. 60-min values using a cut-off of ≥500 nmol/L, 45 patients (13.4%) failed to reach the cut-off at 30 minutes, but met the cut-off at 60 minutes. Conversely, only two patients (0.6%) who met the cut-off at 30 minutes failed to reach it at 60 minutes.

The authors concluded that outcomes from ACTH testing are not affected by time of day. Furthermore, using a 30-minutes cortisol level in isolation results in more than one in seven patients having a false positive diagnosis of AI; a 60-minutes value of ≥500 nmol/L alone may be sufficient to diagnose AI in more than 99% of cases. The study was published in the April 2018 issue of the journal Clinical Biochemistry.

Related Links:
Dalhousie University

Gold Member
Antipsychotic TDM Assays
Saladax Antipsychotic Assays
Verification Panels for Assay Development & QC
Seroconversion Panels
New
Auto Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
cobas c 703
New
Silver Member
Total Hemoglobin Monitoring System
GREENCARE Hb

Print article

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The Mirvie RNA platform predicts pregnancy complications months before they occur using a simple blood test (Photo courtesy of Mirvie)

RNA-Based Blood Test Detects Preeclampsia Risk Months Before Symptoms

Preeclampsia remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, as well as preterm births. Despite current guidelines that aim to identify pregnant women at increased risk of preeclampsia using... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: The cancer stem cell test can accurately choose more effective treatments (Photo courtesy of University of Cincinnati)

Stem Cell Test Predicts Treatment Outcome for Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer frequently responds to chemotherapy initially, but eventually, the tumor develops resistance to the therapy, leading to regrowth. This resistance is partially due to the activation... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The lab-in-tube assay could improve TB diagnoses in rural or resource-limited areas (Photo courtesy of Kenny Lass/Tulane University)

Handheld Device Deliver Low-Cost TB Results in Less Than One Hour

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the deadliest infectious disease globally, affecting an estimated 10 million people annually. In 2021, about 4.2 million TB cases went undiagnosed or unreported, mainly due to... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Schematic illustration of the chip (Photo courtesy of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2025.117401)

Pain-On-A-Chip Microfluidic Device Determines Types of Chronic Pain from Blood Samples

Chronic pain is a widespread condition that remains difficult to manage, and existing clinical methods for its treatment rely largely on self-reporting, which can be subjective and especially problematic... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: The collaboration aims to leverage Oxford Nanopore\'s sequencing platform and Cepheid\'s GeneXpert system to advance the field of sequencing for infectious diseases (Photo courtesy of Cepheid)

Cepheid and Oxford Nanopore Technologies Partner on Advancing Automated Sequencing-Based Solutions

Cepheid (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), a leading molecular diagnostics company, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, UK), the company behind a new generation of sequencing-based molecular analysis technologies,... Read more
Sekisui Diagnostics UK Ltd.