Commercial RT-PCR Tests Compared to Culture for Bacterial Gastroenteritis
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 11 Jan 2022 |

Image: ProGastro SSCS is a multiplex real time PCR for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, (C. jejuni and C. coli only, undifferentiated) nucleic acids and Shiga Toxin 1 (stx1) and Shiga Toxin 2 (stx2) genes (Photo courtesy of Hologic)
Nucleic acid-based testing (culture-independent diagnostic testing, CIDT) for bacterial gastroenteritis offers three major advantages over culture-based diagnosis: it has better analytical sensitivity, is less labor intensive through automation, and has faster turnaround times.
Multiple commercial nucleic acid test assays (i.e. real-time PCR, RT-PCR) are available, testing at a minimum of four pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Shigella). However, there are many caveats associated with CIDT for bacterial gastroenteritis, and gaps in the evaluation of commercial assays.
Clinical Microbiologists at the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB, Canada) and their colleagues used clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were for a comparison of four commercial RT-PCR tests. The four tests were: RIDAGENE Bacterial Stool Panel and EHEC/EPEC Panel (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany); FTD Bacterial Gastroenteritis assay (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg); BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel and Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel (BD Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada); Prodesse ProGastr SSCS Assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
The four commercial RT-PCR assays were challenged with 67 contrived stool specimens, each spiked with an isolate representing different Campylobacter species, Salmonella serotypes, Shigella species and serotypes, STEC toxin subtypes, Y. enterocolitica serotypes/biotypes, and Yersina spp; these isolates are the common circulating types in Alberta, Canada. All assays gave positive results for C. jejuni, C. coli, Y. enterocolitica, and all species and serotypes of Shigella, but negative results for Y. non-enterocoltica spp. and C. upsaliensis. Most Shiga toxin subtypes were detected by all assays except for stx2f, which was detected by Ridagene.
The performance of the four commercial assays was assessed using 171 clinical fecal specimens collected prospectively, which were initially tested by culture at the frontline diagnostic laboratories. This included feces that were 125 culture-positive or 46 culture-negative for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, STEC, or Y. enterocolitica. Using culture as a reference standard, the sensitivity for all organisms (excluding Yersinia) was >96% for all four assays and specificity was >90%, except for BD Max (87%).
The authors concluded that their study provided a third-party evaluation of four commercially available RT-PCR assays for bacterial gastroenteritis and demonstrated the assays to be mostly equivalent to each other and culture with a few caveats. Depending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens. The study was published on January 1, 2022 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
University of Calgary
R-Biopharm
Fast Track Diagnostics
BD Canada
Hologic
Multiple commercial nucleic acid test assays (i.e. real-time PCR, RT-PCR) are available, testing at a minimum of four pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Shigella). However, there are many caveats associated with CIDT for bacterial gastroenteritis, and gaps in the evaluation of commercial assays.
Clinical Microbiologists at the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB, Canada) and their colleagues used clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were for a comparison of four commercial RT-PCR tests. The four tests were: RIDAGENE Bacterial Stool Panel and EHEC/EPEC Panel (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany); FTD Bacterial Gastroenteritis assay (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg); BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel and Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel (BD Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada); Prodesse ProGastr SSCS Assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
The four commercial RT-PCR assays were challenged with 67 contrived stool specimens, each spiked with an isolate representing different Campylobacter species, Salmonella serotypes, Shigella species and serotypes, STEC toxin subtypes, Y. enterocolitica serotypes/biotypes, and Yersina spp; these isolates are the common circulating types in Alberta, Canada. All assays gave positive results for C. jejuni, C. coli, Y. enterocolitica, and all species and serotypes of Shigella, but negative results for Y. non-enterocoltica spp. and C. upsaliensis. Most Shiga toxin subtypes were detected by all assays except for stx2f, which was detected by Ridagene.
The performance of the four commercial assays was assessed using 171 clinical fecal specimens collected prospectively, which were initially tested by culture at the frontline diagnostic laboratories. This included feces that were 125 culture-positive or 46 culture-negative for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, STEC, or Y. enterocolitica. Using culture as a reference standard, the sensitivity for all organisms (excluding Yersinia) was >96% for all four assays and specificity was >90%, except for BD Max (87%).
The authors concluded that their study provided a third-party evaluation of four commercially available RT-PCR assays for bacterial gastroenteritis and demonstrated the assays to be mostly equivalent to each other and culture with a few caveats. Depending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens. The study was published on January 1, 2022 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
University of Calgary
R-Biopharm
Fast Track Diagnostics
BD Canada
Hologic
Latest Microbiology News
- Handheld Device Delivers Low-Cost TB Results in Less Than One Hour
- New AI-Based Method Improves Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Infections
- Breakthrough Diagnostic Technology Identifies Bacterial Infections with Almost 100% Accuracy within Three Hours
- Innovative ID/AST System to Help Diagnose Infectious Diseases and Combat AMR
- Gastrointestinal Panel Delivers Rapid Detection of Five Common Bacterial Pathogens for Outpatient Use
- Rapid PCR Testing in ICU Improves Antibiotic Stewardship
- Unique Genetic Signature Predicts Drug Resistance in Bacteria
- Unique Barcoding System Tracks Pneumonia-Causing Bacteria as They Infect Blood Stream
- Rapid Sepsis Diagnostic Test Demonstrates Improved Patient Care and Cost Savings in Hospital Application
- Rapid Diagnostic System to Detect Neonatal Sepsis Within Hours
- Novel Test to Diagnose Bacterial Pneumonia Directly from Whole Blood
- Interferon-γ Release Assay Effective in Patients with COPD Complicated with Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- New Point of Care Tests to Help Reduce Overuse of Antibiotics
- 30-Minute Sepsis Test Differentiates Bacterial Infections, Viral Infections, and Noninfectious Disease
- CRISPR-TB Blood Test to Enable Early Disease Diagnosis and Public Screening
- Syndromic Panel Provides Fast Answers for Outpatient Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Conditions
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
‘Brilliantly Luminous’ Nanoscale Chemical Tool to Improve Disease Detection
Thousands of commercially available glowing molecules known as fluorophores are commonly used in medical imaging, disease detection, biomarker tagging, and chemical analysis. They are also integral in... Read more
Low-Cost Portable Screening Test to Transform Kidney Disease Detection
Millions of individuals suffer from kidney disease, which often remains undiagnosed until it has reached a critical stage. This silent epidemic not only diminishes the quality of life for those affected... Read more
New Method Uses Pulsed Infrared Light to Find Cancer's 'Fingerprints' In Blood Plasma
Cancer diagnoses have traditionally relied on invasive or time-consuming procedures like tissue biopsies. Now, new research published in ACS Central Science introduces a method that utilizes pulsed infrared... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Blood Biomarker Test Could Detect Genetic Predisposition to Alzheimer’s
New medications for Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia, are now becoming available. These treatments, known as “amyloid antibodies,” work by promoting the removal of small deposits from... Read more
Novel Autoantibody Against DAGLA Discovered in Cerebellitis
Autoimmune cerebellar ataxias are strongly disabling disorders characterized by an impaired ability to coordinate muscle movement. Cerebellar autoantibodies serve as useful biomarkers to support rapid... Read more
Gene-Based Blood Test Accurately Predicts Tumor Recurrence of Advanced Skin Cancer
Melanoma, an aggressive form of skin cancer, becomes extremely difficult to treat once it spreads to other parts of the body. For patients with metastatic melanoma tumors that cannot be surgically removed... Read moreHematology
view channel
New Scoring System Predicts Risk of Developing Cancer from Common Blood Disorder
Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is a blood disorder commonly found in older adults, characterized by mutations in blood cells and a low blood count, but without any obvious cause or... Read more
Non-Invasive Prenatal Test for Fetal RhD Status Demonstrates 100% Accuracy
In the United States, approximately 15% of pregnant individuals are RhD-negative. However, in about 40% of these cases, the fetus is also RhD-negative, making the administration of RhoGAM unnecessary.... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Stem Cell Test Predicts Treatment Outcome for Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Epithelial ovarian cancer frequently responds to chemotherapy initially, but eventually, the tumor develops resistance to the therapy, leading to regrowth. This resistance is partially due to the activation... Read more
Machine Learning-Enabled Blood Test Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Lymphoma Patients
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as one of the most promising recent developments in the treatment of blood cancers. However, over half of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients... Read morePathology
view channel
Novel UV and Machine Learning-Aided Method Detects Microbial Contamination in Cell Cultures
Cell therapy holds great potential in treating diseases such as cancers, inflammatory conditions, and chronic degenerative disorders by manipulating or replacing cells to restore function or combat disease.... Read more
New Error-Corrected Method to Help Detect Cancer from Blood Samples Alone
"Liquid biopsy" technology, which relies on blood tests for early cancer detection and monitoring cancer burden in patients, has the potential to transform cancer care. However, detecting the mutational... Read more
"Metal Detector" Algorithm Hunts Down Vulnerable Tumors
Scientists have developed an algorithm capable of functioning as a "metal detector" to identify vulnerable tumors, marking a significant advancement in personalized cancer treatment. This breakthrough... Read more
Novel Technique Uses ‘Sugar’ Signatures to Identify and Classify Pancreatic Cancer Cell Subtypes
Pancreatic cancer is often asymptomatic in its early stages, making it difficult to detect until it has progressed. Consequently, only 15% of pancreatic cancers are diagnosed early enough to allow for... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Disposable Microchip Technology Could Selectively Detect HIV in Whole Blood Samples
As of the end of 2023, approximately 40 million people globally were living with HIV, and around 630,000 individuals died from AIDS-related illnesses that same year. Despite a substantial decline in deaths... Read more
Pain-On-A-Chip Microfluidic Device Determines Types of Chronic Pain from Blood Samples
Chronic pain is a widespread condition that remains difficult to manage, and existing clinical methods for its treatment rely largely on self-reporting, which can be subjective and especially problematic... Read more
Innovative, Label-Free Ratiometric Fluorosensor Enables More Sensitive Viral RNA Detection
Viruses present a major global health risk, as demonstrated by recent pandemics, making early detection and identification essential for preventing new outbreaks. While traditional detection methods are... Read moreIndustry
view channel
Cepheid and Oxford Nanopore Technologies Partner on Advancing Automated Sequencing-Based Solutions
Cepheid (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), a leading molecular diagnostics company, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, UK), the company behind a new generation of sequencing-based molecular analysis technologies,... Read more
Grifols and Tecan’s IBL Collaborate on Advanced Biomarker Panels
Grifols (Barcelona, Spain), one of the world’s leading producers of plasma-derived medicines and innovative diagnostic solutions, is expanding its offer in clinical diagnostics through a strategic partnership... Read more