Whole Blood DNA Extraction Methods Compared
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 14 Aug 2014 |
In the clinical laboratory, nucleic acids are routinely isolated from various types of specimen, including blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, stool, urine, buccal swabs, and respiratory specimens, for use in a wide array of molecular diagnostic tests.
Both the quality and quantity of the extracted nucleic acids are crucial to the successful implementation of downstream molecular diagnostic procedures, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR, microarray analyses, and direct sequencing.
Laboratory scientists at the Asian Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea) collected blood samples from five healthy donors and all DNA extraction processes were performed within six hours of specimen collection. The team evaluated the efficiency of three extraction methods by comparison based on the total amount of extracted DNA adjusted by input blood volume, and the purity of the extract. Polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed using the Actin Beta gene (ACTB) as a target. The real-time PCR assay was carried out for housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Total elapsed time for DNA extraction was compared.
The three extraction methods were the Nextractor NX-48 system, (Genolution; Seoul, Republic of Korea); the manual QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen; Valencia, CA, USA), and the automated Maxwell system method (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). Following DNA extraction, the optical density of each sample was read at 260 nm and 280 nm using a NanoDrop ND-2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific; Wilmington, DE, USA). Real-time PCR was run on a SmartCycler system (Cepheid; Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Extraction efficiencies for the QIAamp was 25.4 ± 3.8 ng/μL, for the Maxwell it was 9.2 ± 0.6 ng/μL, and the Nextractor system was the most efficient at 31.0 ± 5.6 ng/μL. No significant differences in purity were observed among three methods. DNA extracted using the ACTB was successfully amplified in all three methods. There were no obvious differences in cycle threshold (Ct) values for GAPDH real-time PCR. Total elapsed time for DNA extraction was about 50 minutes for the QIAamp, 40 minutes for the Maxwell, and 20 minutes for the Nextractor.
The authors concluded that both the purity and yield of the Nextractor system were similar to that of manual extraction. The relative speed and low hands-on time represent clear benefits over manual processes. Therefore, the Nextractor system represents a useful alternative to manual DNA extraction in clinical laboratories that is suitable for many downstream molecular diagnostic applications. The study was published in the August 2014 issue of the journal Clinica Chimica Acta.
Related Links:
Asian Medical Center
Genolution
Cepheid
Both the quality and quantity of the extracted nucleic acids are crucial to the successful implementation of downstream molecular diagnostic procedures, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR, microarray analyses, and direct sequencing.
Laboratory scientists at the Asian Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea) collected blood samples from five healthy donors and all DNA extraction processes were performed within six hours of specimen collection. The team evaluated the efficiency of three extraction methods by comparison based on the total amount of extracted DNA adjusted by input blood volume, and the purity of the extract. Polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed using the Actin Beta gene (ACTB) as a target. The real-time PCR assay was carried out for housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Total elapsed time for DNA extraction was compared.
The three extraction methods were the Nextractor NX-48 system, (Genolution; Seoul, Republic of Korea); the manual QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen; Valencia, CA, USA), and the automated Maxwell system method (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). Following DNA extraction, the optical density of each sample was read at 260 nm and 280 nm using a NanoDrop ND-2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific; Wilmington, DE, USA). Real-time PCR was run on a SmartCycler system (Cepheid; Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Extraction efficiencies for the QIAamp was 25.4 ± 3.8 ng/μL, for the Maxwell it was 9.2 ± 0.6 ng/μL, and the Nextractor system was the most efficient at 31.0 ± 5.6 ng/μL. No significant differences in purity were observed among three methods. DNA extracted using the ACTB was successfully amplified in all three methods. There were no obvious differences in cycle threshold (Ct) values for GAPDH real-time PCR. Total elapsed time for DNA extraction was about 50 minutes for the QIAamp, 40 minutes for the Maxwell, and 20 minutes for the Nextractor.
The authors concluded that both the purity and yield of the Nextractor system were similar to that of manual extraction. The relative speed and low hands-on time represent clear benefits over manual processes. Therefore, the Nextractor system represents a useful alternative to manual DNA extraction in clinical laboratories that is suitable for many downstream molecular diagnostic applications. The study was published in the August 2014 issue of the journal Clinica Chimica Acta.
Related Links:
Asian Medical Center
Genolution
Cepheid
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get complete access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
- Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
- Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
- Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
- Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
- Free breaking news sent via email
- Free access to Events Calendar
- Free access to LinkXpress new product services
- REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Sign in: Registered website members
Sign in: Registered magazine subscribers
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Four-In-One Molecular Test Detects and Differentiates Among Most Prevalent Respiratory Viruses in 20 Minutes
- First-Line PSA Testing More Cost-Effective Than First-Line MRI for Prostate Cancer Screening
- Proteomics Platform Identifies Proteins in Blood to Give Cancer Warning 7 Years before Diagnosis
- AI Technology-Based Blood Test Identifies Lung Cancer Earlier
- Ultra-Sensitive Blood Test Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence Months or Even Years before Relapse
- Prenatal Testing Offers Window for Finding Mother’s Cancer Risk
- New Molecular Test Detects More Cervical Cancer Cases
- New Panel Quickly and Accurately Identifies 16 Common Gastrointestinal Pathogens
- New DNA Testing Method Offers Faster and More Accurate Pathogen Identification
- Precise Cancer Detection Method as Quick and Easy as Blood Test
- DNA Spit Test More Accurate At Identifying Future Prostate Cancer Risk
- Novel Method Combining Nano Informatics and AI Paves Way for Cancer Blood Tests
- Groundbreaking Molecular Diagnostic Kit to Provide Lyme Disease Detection in Minutes
- New Assay Detects Heart Failure Biomarker in Less than 11 Minutes
- Innovative Test Improves Assessment of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- New Method for Lung Microbiomes Analysis Predicts Mortality in Children after Bone Marrow Transplant