Gene Test Predicts Melanoma Metastases
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 07 Apr 2014 |

Image: A melanoma on a patient\'s skin (Photo courtesy of the US National Cancer Institute).
A gene expression profile (GEP) test can identify primary cutaneous melanoma tumors that are likely to metastasize in patients who had a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.
The noninvasive 31-gene GEP test that is widely used to determine metastatic risk in Stage I and II melanoma patients has been compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) which has traditionally been the best prognostic test available for melanoma patients.
Scientists at Castle Biosciences Inc. (Friendswood, TX, USA) compared their test called DecisionDx-Melanoma to results from134 patients with Stage I, II, or III cutaneous melanoma. These 134 patients represented all patients in the initial clinical validation studies who had a documented sentinel lymph node procedure. The DecisionDx-Melanoma is a proprietary test carried out in the company’s laboratories.
In patients with a negative SLNB, a result interpreted as a lower risk for metastasis, the GEP test identified the vast majority of melanomas that ultimately progressed over the subsequent five year period. The rate of five year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 55% for SLNB negative patients compared to 37% for SLNB positive patients The GEP test results showed improved prognostic accuracy in these same patients with an MFS of 87% for the low-risk (Class 1) patients and 31% for the high risk (Class 2) patients.
The GEP test showed improved prognostic accuracy, with an overall survival (OS) for GEP Class 1 patients of 92% compared to 49% for Class 2 patients. The GEP test was also analyzed in combination with SLNB status. The 20% of patients who had high risk results for both tests (GEP Class 2 and SLNB positive) had lower survival rates (MFS=34%; OS=53%). Similarly, the 31% of patients who had low risk results for both tests (GEP Class 1 and SLNB negative) had higher survival rates (MFS=82%; OS=92%). Importantly, in the 49% of patients who had results that were discordant, high risk outcome for one test, low risk for the other, the GEP test result correctly predicted the patients' clinical outcomes. Net reclassification improvement of GEP class over SLNB status was greater than 50%.
Pedram Gerami, MD, the study author and an associate professor of Dermatology at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL, USA), said, “The results from this study show the GEP test is an independent predictor of metastasis and death, and significantly improves upon sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma patients. Based upon this data, optimal use of the GEP test may be to identify high risk patients among those with a negative SLNB result, or for patients who are ineligible for or who decline a SLNB procedure.” The study was presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology held March 21-25 2104 in Denver, CO, USA).
Castle Biosciences Inc.
Northwestern University
Related Links:
The noninvasive 31-gene GEP test that is widely used to determine metastatic risk in Stage I and II melanoma patients has been compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) which has traditionally been the best prognostic test available for melanoma patients.
Scientists at Castle Biosciences Inc. (Friendswood, TX, USA) compared their test called DecisionDx-Melanoma to results from134 patients with Stage I, II, or III cutaneous melanoma. These 134 patients represented all patients in the initial clinical validation studies who had a documented sentinel lymph node procedure. The DecisionDx-Melanoma is a proprietary test carried out in the company’s laboratories.
In patients with a negative SLNB, a result interpreted as a lower risk for metastasis, the GEP test identified the vast majority of melanomas that ultimately progressed over the subsequent five year period. The rate of five year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 55% for SLNB negative patients compared to 37% for SLNB positive patients The GEP test results showed improved prognostic accuracy in these same patients with an MFS of 87% for the low-risk (Class 1) patients and 31% for the high risk (Class 2) patients.
The GEP test showed improved prognostic accuracy, with an overall survival (OS) for GEP Class 1 patients of 92% compared to 49% for Class 2 patients. The GEP test was also analyzed in combination with SLNB status. The 20% of patients who had high risk results for both tests (GEP Class 2 and SLNB positive) had lower survival rates (MFS=34%; OS=53%). Similarly, the 31% of patients who had low risk results for both tests (GEP Class 1 and SLNB negative) had higher survival rates (MFS=82%; OS=92%). Importantly, in the 49% of patients who had results that were discordant, high risk outcome for one test, low risk for the other, the GEP test result correctly predicted the patients' clinical outcomes. Net reclassification improvement of GEP class over SLNB status was greater than 50%.
Pedram Gerami, MD, the study author and an associate professor of Dermatology at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL, USA), said, “The results from this study show the GEP test is an independent predictor of metastasis and death, and significantly improves upon sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma patients. Based upon this data, optimal use of the GEP test may be to identify high risk patients among those with a negative SLNB result, or for patients who are ineligible for or who decline a SLNB procedure.” The study was presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology held March 21-25 2104 in Denver, CO, USA).
Castle Biosciences Inc.
Northwestern University
Related Links:
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Plasma Protein Signature Predicts Lung Cancer Risk Up to Five Years Ahead
- Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Guides Chemotherapy, Reduces Relapse in Colon Cancer
- Researchers Uncover Distinct Chromosome Signature in Aggresive ALT Cancers
- Simple Cytogenetic Method Could Improve Classification of ALL Subtypes
- Blood-Based Assay Enables Noninvasive Monitoring of Sarcoma Immunotherapy Response
- Genomic Test Guides Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
- Tumor Mutation Marker Helps Refine Lung Cancer Prognosis and Guide Therapy Selection
- Multi-Cancer Test Boosts Detection When Added to Standard Screening
- Blood-Based MRD Monitoring Supports Relapse Prevention in Leukemia
- Genomic Test Predicts Chemotherapy Benefit in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- Blood Protein Markers Flag Multiple Sclerosis Risk Years Before Diagnosis
- Digital PCR Assays Support Surveillance of Bundibugyo Ebolavirus Outbreak
- Updated Guidance Prioritizes Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
- Blood-Based Proteomic Test May Predict Treatment Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Position Statements Outline Evidence Standards for Multi-Cancer Detection Tests
- Ultrasensitive MRD Blood Test Detects Early Breast Cancer Recurrence
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Saliva-Based Test Detects Biochemical Signs of Sleep Loss
Acute sleep loss impairs cognition and motor skills, raising safety risks that resemble alcohol intoxication. Clinicians currently lack an objective biochemical test to determine when someone is dangerously... Read more
Simple Dual-Tau Blood Test Detects and Stages Alzheimer’s Disease
Alzheimer’s disease is typically confirmed and staged with positron emission tomography scans and cerebrospinal fluid testing, procedures that are costly and invasive. Broader access to minimally invasive... Read more
Alzheimer’s Blood Biomarkers Linked to Early Cognitive Differences Before Dementia
Blood-based screening for Alzheimer’s disease offers a noninvasive, lower-cost alternative to brain imaging or spinal fluid testing, yet its ability to flag the earliest cognitive changes has been unclear.... Read moreHematology
view channel
Next-Generation Hematology Platform Streamlines High-Complexity Lab Workflows
Sysmex America (Chicago, IL, USA) has introduced the next generation XR-Series, centered on the XR-10 Automated Hematology Module for high-complexity laboratories. The platform builds on the widely used... Read more
Blood Eosinophil Count May Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response and Toxicity
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes across many cancers, yet only a subset of patients derive durable benefit and biomarkers to guide treatment remain limited. Eosinophils, best known for... Read moreImmunology
view channelAptamer-Based Biosensor Enables Mutation-Resilient SARS-CoV-2 Detection
Rapid evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can undermine existing molecular diagnostics, especially when assays target small viral components. Double-antibody sandwich... Read more
Study Points to Autoimmune Pathway Behind Long COVID Symptoms
Long COVID leaves many SARS-CoV-2 survivors with persistent fatigue, cognitive issues, palpitations, and musculoskeletal pain for months or years. Estimates cited in new research suggest 4%–20% of infected... Read more
Metabolic Biomarker Distinguishes Latent from Active Tuberculosis and Tracks Treatment Response
Tuberculosis (TB) remains the world’s leading infectious killer, with 10.8 million cases and 1.25 million deaths recorded globally in 2023. Yet many infected individuals never develop active disease, underscoring... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Gut Microbiome Signatures Help Identify Risk of IBD Progression
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with highly variable outcomes.... Read more
FDA-Cleared Gastrointestinal Panel Detects 24 Pathogen Targets
Clinical guidelines support testing based on patient presentation in suspected gastrointestinal infections, yet available technologies have often forced laboratories to choose between panels that are too... Read morePathology
view channel
Blood-Based Method Tracks Gene Activity in the Living Brain
Real-time measurement of gene activity in the brain has been limited by assays requiring destructive tissue sampling. Tracking active genes could reveal how the body responds to environmental factors,... Read more
FDA Approval Expands Automated PD-L1 Testing Across Solid Tumors
Clinical laboratories play a central role in guiding immunotherapy by reporting programmed death ligand-1 (PD‑L1) status across multiple solid tumors. Many sites are standardizing this work on fully automated... Read moreTechnology
view channel
AI Platform Links Biomarker Results to Cancer Clinical Trials and Guidelines
Oncology teams must manage growing volumes of genomic data, rapidly evolving clinical trial options, and frequently updated care guidelines, all within tight clinic schedules. Translating complex tumor... Read more
Agentic AI Platform Supports Genomic Decision-Making in Oncology
Oncology care teams increasingly face the challenge of managing complex molecular diagnostics, evolving treatment options, and extensive electronic health record documentation. Translating multimodal data... Read moreIndustry
view channel








