Gene Test Predicts Melanoma Metastases
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 07 Apr 2014 |

Image: A melanoma on a patient\'s skin (Photo courtesy of the US National Cancer Institute).
A gene expression profile (GEP) test can identify primary cutaneous melanoma tumors that are likely to metastasize in patients who had a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.
The noninvasive 31-gene GEP test that is widely used to determine metastatic risk in Stage I and II melanoma patients has been compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) which has traditionally been the best prognostic test available for melanoma patients.
Scientists at Castle Biosciences Inc. (Friendswood, TX, USA) compared their test called DecisionDx-Melanoma to results from134 patients with Stage I, II, or III cutaneous melanoma. These 134 patients represented all patients in the initial clinical validation studies who had a documented sentinel lymph node procedure. The DecisionDx-Melanoma is a proprietary test carried out in the company’s laboratories.
In patients with a negative SLNB, a result interpreted as a lower risk for metastasis, the GEP test identified the vast majority of melanomas that ultimately progressed over the subsequent five year period. The rate of five year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 55% for SLNB negative patients compared to 37% for SLNB positive patients The GEP test results showed improved prognostic accuracy in these same patients with an MFS of 87% for the low-risk (Class 1) patients and 31% for the high risk (Class 2) patients.
The GEP test showed improved prognostic accuracy, with an overall survival (OS) for GEP Class 1 patients of 92% compared to 49% for Class 2 patients. The GEP test was also analyzed in combination with SLNB status. The 20% of patients who had high risk results for both tests (GEP Class 2 and SLNB positive) had lower survival rates (MFS=34%; OS=53%). Similarly, the 31% of patients who had low risk results for both tests (GEP Class 1 and SLNB negative) had higher survival rates (MFS=82%; OS=92%). Importantly, in the 49% of patients who had results that were discordant, high risk outcome for one test, low risk for the other, the GEP test result correctly predicted the patients' clinical outcomes. Net reclassification improvement of GEP class over SLNB status was greater than 50%.
Pedram Gerami, MD, the study author and an associate professor of Dermatology at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL, USA), said, “The results from this study show the GEP test is an independent predictor of metastasis and death, and significantly improves upon sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma patients. Based upon this data, optimal use of the GEP test may be to identify high risk patients among those with a negative SLNB result, or for patients who are ineligible for or who decline a SLNB procedure.” The study was presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology held March 21-25 2104 in Denver, CO, USA).
Castle Biosciences Inc.
Northwestern University
Related Links:
The noninvasive 31-gene GEP test that is widely used to determine metastatic risk in Stage I and II melanoma patients has been compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) which has traditionally been the best prognostic test available for melanoma patients.
Scientists at Castle Biosciences Inc. (Friendswood, TX, USA) compared their test called DecisionDx-Melanoma to results from134 patients with Stage I, II, or III cutaneous melanoma. These 134 patients represented all patients in the initial clinical validation studies who had a documented sentinel lymph node procedure. The DecisionDx-Melanoma is a proprietary test carried out in the company’s laboratories.
In patients with a negative SLNB, a result interpreted as a lower risk for metastasis, the GEP test identified the vast majority of melanomas that ultimately progressed over the subsequent five year period. The rate of five year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 55% for SLNB negative patients compared to 37% for SLNB positive patients The GEP test results showed improved prognostic accuracy in these same patients with an MFS of 87% for the low-risk (Class 1) patients and 31% for the high risk (Class 2) patients.
The GEP test showed improved prognostic accuracy, with an overall survival (OS) for GEP Class 1 patients of 92% compared to 49% for Class 2 patients. The GEP test was also analyzed in combination with SLNB status. The 20% of patients who had high risk results for both tests (GEP Class 2 and SLNB positive) had lower survival rates (MFS=34%; OS=53%). Similarly, the 31% of patients who had low risk results for both tests (GEP Class 1 and SLNB negative) had higher survival rates (MFS=82%; OS=92%). Importantly, in the 49% of patients who had results that were discordant, high risk outcome for one test, low risk for the other, the GEP test result correctly predicted the patients' clinical outcomes. Net reclassification improvement of GEP class over SLNB status was greater than 50%.
Pedram Gerami, MD, the study author and an associate professor of Dermatology at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL, USA), said, “The results from this study show the GEP test is an independent predictor of metastasis and death, and significantly improves upon sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma patients. Based upon this data, optimal use of the GEP test may be to identify high risk patients among those with a negative SLNB result, or for patients who are ineligible for or who decline a SLNB procedure.” The study was presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology held March 21-25 2104 in Denver, CO, USA).
Castle Biosciences Inc.
Northwestern University
Related Links:
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Machine Learning Model Uses DNA Methylation to Predict Tumor Origin in Cancers of Unknown Primary
- Blood Test Enables Early Detection and Classification of Glioma
- Multi-Biomarker Blood Test Detects Early-Stage Cancers Across Types
- New Sample-to-Answer PCR System Supports High-Throughput Infectious Disease Testing
- Framework Guides Targeted Immunotherapy Selection in Liver Cancer
- Collaboration Brings Rapid At-Home STI Testing with Virtual Follow-Up
- Blood-Based Epigenetic Signals Enable Osteosarcoma Disease Monitoring
- Host–Virus Genetic Interactions Drive Nasopharyngeal Cancer Risk
- AI-Enabled Biochip Detects microRNA Biomarkers in Minutes
- Blood Test Detects Early Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Patients
- Long-Read RNA Sequencing Platform Improves Rare Disease Diagnosis
- Study Confirms Barrett’s Esophagus as Precursor to Esophageal Cancer
- Ultrasensitive Assay Reveals Previously Undetected Tuberculosis in Hospital Patients
- CE-Marked Blood Test Enables Monitoring of Neuroinflammation in Multiple Sclerosis
- Urine-Based Assay Predicts Severe Dengue Risk Early
- Ultrasensitive Assay Tracks Resistance Mutations MRD Monitoring
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Urine-Based Multi-Cancer Screening Test Receives FDA Breakthrough Device Designation
Early detection across multiple cancers remains a major unmet need in population screening. Non-invasive approaches that can be delivered at scale may broaden access and shift diagnoses to earlier stages.... Read more
Blood Test Predicts Alzheimer Disease Risk Before Imaging Changes and Symptoms
Alzheimer's disease often advances silently for years, making timely risk stratification difficult in routine practice. Current approaches to detect pathology can involve lumbar puncture or positron emission... Read moreHematology
view channel
Prognostic Biomarker Identified in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and often presents with aggressive clinical behavior. Although many patients respond to standard chemotherapy with... Read more
Routine Blood Test Parameters Link Anemia to Cancer Risk and Mortality
Anemia detected in routine care can signal underlying pathology and is frequently encountered in adults. Because it is defined by hemoglobin levels below the normal range, it is often evaluated with red... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Immune Aging Clock Quantifies Immunosenescence and Identifies Therapeutic Target
Immune aging undermines host defense and contributes to multiple age-related diseases, yet its heterogeneity complicates measurement and intervention. Clinical laboratories increasingly seek objective... Read more
Study Finds Influenza Often Undiagnosed in Winter Deaths
Seasonal influenza drives substantial excess mortality, yet its contribution is often obscured when infections go undiagnosed near the time of death. Many deaths occur outside hospitals or in older adults... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Gut Microbiome Test Predicts Melanoma Recurrence After Surgery
Melanoma remains prone to relapse even after surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy, with 25% to 40% of patients experiencing recurrence. Clinicians lack reliable pre-treatment indicators to identify those... Read more
Rapid Blood-Culture Susceptibility Panel Expands Coverage for Gram-Negative Infections
Gram-negative bloodstream infections and sepsis demand fast, precise antimicrobial therapy, yet conventional susceptibility workflows can delay targeted treatment. Clinical laboratories need platforms... Read morePathology
view channel
AI Pathology Model Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Lung Cancer
Clinicians face persistent challenges identifying which patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer will benefit from immunotherapy, even as these agents transform oncology care.... Read more
AI Precision Tests Deliver Cancer Risk Insights from Routine H&E Slides
Reliable prognostic profiling and biomarker screening are essential to guide oncology treatment decisions, while laboratories must balance speed and resource constraints. Earlier identification of high‑risk... Read moreTechnology
view channel
AI Tool Predicts Non-Response to Targeted Therapy in Colorectal Cancer
Advanced bowel cancer remains difficult to treat, and many patients receive targeted therapies that do not help them but still cause harm. Clinicians need reliable ways to identify likely responders before... Read more
Integrated System Streamlines Pre-Analytical Workflow for Molecular Testing
Pre-analytical variation remains a leading source of inconsistent molecular test results and added costs, particularly when laboratories rely on multiple instruments and protocols. Standardizing nucleic... Read moreIndustry
view channel
QuidelOrtho Adds Ultra-Fast PCR Platform with LEX Acquisition
QuidelOrtho Corporation has completed the acquisition of LEX Diagnostics for approximately USD 100 million in cash. The transaction adds the LEX VELO System to QuidelOrtho’s portfolio. The platform received U.... Read more
Seegene Showcases Real-Time PCR Data Analytics Platform at ESCMID
Seegene introduced STAgora, a real-time data analytics platform built on aggregated statistical testing data, at ESCMID Global 2026 in Munich, where it also presented an enhanced model of its automated... Read more
Roche Affiliate Expands MRD Portfolio with SAGA Acquisition
Foundation Medicine, Inc., an independent affiliate of Roche, announced plans to expand its monitoring portfolio with SAGA Diagnostics’ Pathlight, a personalized, tumor-informed molecular residual disease... Read more







