Gene Test Predicts Melanoma Metastases
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 07 Apr 2014 |

Image: A melanoma on a patient\'s skin (Photo courtesy of the US National Cancer Institute).
A gene expression profile (GEP) test can identify primary cutaneous melanoma tumors that are likely to metastasize in patients who had a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.
The noninvasive 31-gene GEP test that is widely used to determine metastatic risk in Stage I and II melanoma patients has been compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) which has traditionally been the best prognostic test available for melanoma patients.
Scientists at Castle Biosciences Inc. (Friendswood, TX, USA) compared their test called DecisionDx-Melanoma to results from134 patients with Stage I, II, or III cutaneous melanoma. These 134 patients represented all patients in the initial clinical validation studies who had a documented sentinel lymph node procedure. The DecisionDx-Melanoma is a proprietary test carried out in the company’s laboratories.
In patients with a negative SLNB, a result interpreted as a lower risk for metastasis, the GEP test identified the vast majority of melanomas that ultimately progressed over the subsequent five year period. The rate of five year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 55% for SLNB negative patients compared to 37% for SLNB positive patients The GEP test results showed improved prognostic accuracy in these same patients with an MFS of 87% for the low-risk (Class 1) patients and 31% for the high risk (Class 2) patients.
The GEP test showed improved prognostic accuracy, with an overall survival (OS) for GEP Class 1 patients of 92% compared to 49% for Class 2 patients. The GEP test was also analyzed in combination with SLNB status. The 20% of patients who had high risk results for both tests (GEP Class 2 and SLNB positive) had lower survival rates (MFS=34%; OS=53%). Similarly, the 31% of patients who had low risk results for both tests (GEP Class 1 and SLNB negative) had higher survival rates (MFS=82%; OS=92%). Importantly, in the 49% of patients who had results that were discordant, high risk outcome for one test, low risk for the other, the GEP test result correctly predicted the patients' clinical outcomes. Net reclassification improvement of GEP class over SLNB status was greater than 50%.
Pedram Gerami, MD, the study author and an associate professor of Dermatology at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL, USA), said, “The results from this study show the GEP test is an independent predictor of metastasis and death, and significantly improves upon sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma patients. Based upon this data, optimal use of the GEP test may be to identify high risk patients among those with a negative SLNB result, or for patients who are ineligible for or who decline a SLNB procedure.” The study was presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology held March 21-25 2104 in Denver, CO, USA).
Castle Biosciences Inc.
Northwestern University
Related Links:
The noninvasive 31-gene GEP test that is widely used to determine metastatic risk in Stage I and II melanoma patients has been compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) which has traditionally been the best prognostic test available for melanoma patients.
Scientists at Castle Biosciences Inc. (Friendswood, TX, USA) compared their test called DecisionDx-Melanoma to results from134 patients with Stage I, II, or III cutaneous melanoma. These 134 patients represented all patients in the initial clinical validation studies who had a documented sentinel lymph node procedure. The DecisionDx-Melanoma is a proprietary test carried out in the company’s laboratories.
In patients with a negative SLNB, a result interpreted as a lower risk for metastasis, the GEP test identified the vast majority of melanomas that ultimately progressed over the subsequent five year period. The rate of five year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 55% for SLNB negative patients compared to 37% for SLNB positive patients The GEP test results showed improved prognostic accuracy in these same patients with an MFS of 87% for the low-risk (Class 1) patients and 31% for the high risk (Class 2) patients.
The GEP test showed improved prognostic accuracy, with an overall survival (OS) for GEP Class 1 patients of 92% compared to 49% for Class 2 patients. The GEP test was also analyzed in combination with SLNB status. The 20% of patients who had high risk results for both tests (GEP Class 2 and SLNB positive) had lower survival rates (MFS=34%; OS=53%). Similarly, the 31% of patients who had low risk results for both tests (GEP Class 1 and SLNB negative) had higher survival rates (MFS=82%; OS=92%). Importantly, in the 49% of patients who had results that were discordant, high risk outcome for one test, low risk for the other, the GEP test result correctly predicted the patients' clinical outcomes. Net reclassification improvement of GEP class over SLNB status was greater than 50%.
Pedram Gerami, MD, the study author and an associate professor of Dermatology at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL, USA), said, “The results from this study show the GEP test is an independent predictor of metastasis and death, and significantly improves upon sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma patients. Based upon this data, optimal use of the GEP test may be to identify high risk patients among those with a negative SLNB result, or for patients who are ineligible for or who decline a SLNB procedure.” The study was presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology held March 21-25 2104 in Denver, CO, USA).
Castle Biosciences Inc.
Northwestern University
Related Links:
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Blood-Based RNA Biomarker Improves Prediction of Alzheimer’s Onset
- New Molecular Marker Helps Predict Multiple Myeloma Prognosis
- Gene Expression Test Supports Metastatic Risk Assessment in Melanoma
- Multiplex PCR Test Identifies Seven STI Pathogens in One Hour
- CSF Sequencing Test Aligns with Updated Brain Tumor Guidelines
- Framework Outlines Genomic Testing Strategy for Safer Drug Dosing in Africa
- Point-of-Care PCR Panel Delivers Vaginitis Results in 20 Minutes
- Blood Test Reveals Hidden Pancreatic Cancer After Treatment
- Gene Expression Test Refines Melanoma Biopsy Decision-Making
- Genomic Assays Predict Anthracycline Benefit in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
- Ultrasensitive ctDNA Assay Detects MRD in Breast, Colorectal, Renal Cancers
- Model Predicts Increased ALS Clinic Visits with Expanded Genetic Testing
- Genetic Marker Supports Anti-TNF Therapy Selection in Crohn’s Disease
- Female-Specific RNA Biomarker May Help Explain Sex Differences in Immune Disease
- Genomic Test Guides Taxane-Based Chemotherapy Selection in Breast Cancer
- RNA Blood Test May Enable Earlier Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
FDA-Approved Test Identifies Low Risk of Large Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis
Chronic liver disease contributes substantially to mortality, and clinicians routinely screen adults with compensated cirrhosis for varices to prevent bleeding. However, endoscopy is invasive and reso... Read more
Blood Protein Signature Diagnoses Pediatric IBD and Distinguishes Subtypes
Confirming pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires imaging, endoscopy, and histopathology, prolonging time to diagnosis. Reliable, noninvasive blood tests remain an unmet need in routine... Read moreHematology
view channel
Next-Generation Hematology Platform Streamlines High-Complexity Lab Workflows
Sysmex America (Chicago, IL, USA) has introduced the next generation XR-Series, centered on the XR-10 Automated Hematology Module for high-complexity laboratories. The platform builds on the widely used... Read more
Blood Eosinophil Count May Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response and Toxicity
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes across many cancers, yet only a subset of patients derive durable benefit and biomarkers to guide treatment remain limited. Eosinophils, best known for... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Anti-Lipid Antibody Biomarkers May Identify Early Lyme Disease and Persistent Symptoms
Lyme disease is often missed during its earliest and most treatable stage, while current serologic assays cannot distinguish active infection from prior exposure. Nearly half a million Americans are diagnosed... Read more
Emergency Department Opt-Out Testing Program Identifies Undiagnosed HIV
Undiagnosed HIV continues to drive avoidable morbidity and transmission, with many people identified only after substantial immune damage has occurred. In England, about one in 20 people living with HIV... Read more
Immune Biomarkers Could Identify Risk of Chronic Critical Illness on ICU Admission
Severe traumatic injury can trigger immune and organ dysfunction that complicates recovery in the intensive care unit. A subset of patients develop chronic critical illness, defined as dependence on intensive... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Rapid Gastrointestinal PCR Panels Deliver One-Hour Results
Acute infectious gastroenteritis remains a major cause of illness worldwide, especially in young children, older adults, and immunocompromised patients. Nonspecific symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting,... Read more
H. pylori Screening Within Colorectal Program Aids Gastric Cancer Prevention
Health systems increasingly rely on economic evidence to guide cancer prevention strategies. For gastric cancer, selecting screening approaches that can integrate with existing programs is a key policy question.... Read more
Machine Learning Reveals Consistent Gut Microbiome Patterns in Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer has been repeatedly linked to alterations in the gut microbiome, yet findings have often varied across small, heterogeneous studies. Reproducibility has been limited by differing sequencing... Read morePathology
view channel
AI Pathology Tool Predicts Immunotherapy Response in Rare Cancers
Immunotherapy has transformed care for select malignancies, yet predicting which patients with rare cancers are most likely to benefit remains challenging. Clinicians often have only limited biomarkers... Read more
Uncertainty-Aware AI Tool Improves Digital Pathology for Cancer Subtyping
Reliable histologic subtyping guides therapy selection in oncology, yet diagnostic workflows grow more complex as whole-slide imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) expand. A persistent obstacle to clinical... Read moreTechnology
view channel
AI Platform Links Biomarker Results to Cancer Clinical Trials and Guidelines
Oncology teams must manage growing volumes of genomic data, rapidly evolving clinical trial options, and frequently updated care guidelines, all within tight clinic schedules. Translating complex tumor... Read more
Agentic AI Platform Supports Genomic Decision-Making in Oncology
Oncology care teams increasingly face the challenge of managing complex molecular diagnostics, evolving treatment options, and extensive electronic health record documentation. Translating multimodal data... Read moreIndustry
view channel
Partnership Integrates Automated DNA Extraction with Single-Molecule Digital PCR
Countable Labs (Palo Alto, CA, USA) and Promega (Madison, WI, USA) have entered a co-marketing agreement that integrates the Promega Maxwell System for nucleic acid extraction with Countable Labs’ Countable... Read more








