Immunological Tests Are Superior for Colon Cancer Screening
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 18 Jul 2013 |
Image: OC-Sensor fully automated fecal occult blood analyzer (Photo courtesy of Eiken Chemical).
The fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin offer a number of advantages over traditional guaiac based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs).
The major advantage seems to come at the price of higher positivity rates and lower specificity and hence a higher load of work-up colonoscopies, which makes a final judgment of the superiority of either test difficult.
Scientists from the German Cancer Research Center (Heidelberg, Germany) compared three quantitative FITs with a gFOBT among participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. They obtained stool samples and colonoscopy reports from 2,235 participants of screening colonoscopy from 2005 to 2009. Patients willing to participate were given stool collection instructions and devices, including a small container and one test card for a gFOBT (HemOccult, Beckman Coulter; Krefeld, Germany).
The stored stool samples were assayed with two automated, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based FITs, RIDASCREEN Haemoglobin, and RIDASCREEN Haemo-/Haptoglobin Complex, (R-Biopharm AG; Darmstadt, Germany). Cut-offs for positivity was 2 μg hemoglobin per gram stool. The stool samples were further analyzed, including a third FIT, OC-SENSOR, (Eiken Chemical; Tokyo, Japan).
The enzyme-based test detected one third of all colon cancer cases, about 9% of advanced precancerous adenomas lesions, and about 5% of early precancerous lesions. In 95 out of 100 participants with negative test results, no tissue abnormalities were found in the subsequent colonoscopy. Despite the already high specificities of the gFOBT for all outcomes, ranging from 95.2% to 95.4%, specificities were even higher for each of the FITs and each outcome. With estimates between 96.8% and 97.8%, specificities with respect to the detection of any cancer or any advanced neoplasm were very high for all three FITs.
Hermann Brenner, MD, MPH, a professor of clinical epidemiology, and senior author of the study said, “For the first time we have shown by direct comparison that the diagnostic performance of immunological stool tests is significantly higher than that of the enzymatic test at the same rate of positive results. Tests for occult blood in the stool will continue to be an important part of colon cancer screening. We therefore recommend including immunological tests in cancer screening programs in Germany. Many more people would thus benefit by obtaining a life-saving clue pointing to a hidden case of cancer.” The study was published on May 22, 2013, in the European Journal of Cancer.
Related Links:
Beckman Coulter
R-Biopharm
Eiken Chemical
The major advantage seems to come at the price of higher positivity rates and lower specificity and hence a higher load of work-up colonoscopies, which makes a final judgment of the superiority of either test difficult.
Scientists from the German Cancer Research Center (Heidelberg, Germany) compared three quantitative FITs with a gFOBT among participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. They obtained stool samples and colonoscopy reports from 2,235 participants of screening colonoscopy from 2005 to 2009. Patients willing to participate were given stool collection instructions and devices, including a small container and one test card for a gFOBT (HemOccult, Beckman Coulter; Krefeld, Germany).
The stored stool samples were assayed with two automated, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based FITs, RIDASCREEN Haemoglobin, and RIDASCREEN Haemo-/Haptoglobin Complex, (R-Biopharm AG; Darmstadt, Germany). Cut-offs for positivity was 2 μg hemoglobin per gram stool. The stool samples were further analyzed, including a third FIT, OC-SENSOR, (Eiken Chemical; Tokyo, Japan).
The enzyme-based test detected one third of all colon cancer cases, about 9% of advanced precancerous adenomas lesions, and about 5% of early precancerous lesions. In 95 out of 100 participants with negative test results, no tissue abnormalities were found in the subsequent colonoscopy. Despite the already high specificities of the gFOBT for all outcomes, ranging from 95.2% to 95.4%, specificities were even higher for each of the FITs and each outcome. With estimates between 96.8% and 97.8%, specificities with respect to the detection of any cancer or any advanced neoplasm were very high for all three FITs.
Hermann Brenner, MD, MPH, a professor of clinical epidemiology, and senior author of the study said, “For the first time we have shown by direct comparison that the diagnostic performance of immunological stool tests is significantly higher than that of the enzymatic test at the same rate of positive results. Tests for occult blood in the stool will continue to be an important part of colon cancer screening. We therefore recommend including immunological tests in cancer screening programs in Germany. Many more people would thus benefit by obtaining a life-saving clue pointing to a hidden case of cancer.” The study was published on May 22, 2013, in the European Journal of Cancer.
Related Links:
Beckman Coulter
R-Biopharm
Eiken Chemical
Latest Immunology News
- Microfluidic Chip-Based Device to Measure Viral Immunity
- Simple Blood Test Could Detect Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients
- Advanced Imaging Method Maps Immune Cell Connections to Predict Cancer Patients Survival
- Computational Tool Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
- Biomarker Could Predict Immunotherapy Response in Liver Cancer
- Epigenetic Test Could Determine Efficacy of New Immunotherapy Treatments Against Multiple Myeloma
- Blood Test Predicts Survival in Liver Cancer Patients
- Simple Blood Test Identifies Multiple Myeloma Patients Likely to Benefit from CAR-T Immunotherapy
- Portable Device Analyzes White Blood Cell Activity to Monitor Cancer Patients’ Health
- New Test Detects Return of Blood Cancer a Year Earlier
- Universal Blood Test Could Predict Organ Transplant Outcomes with Unprecedented Accuracy
- AI Tool Predicts Cancer Patients’ Response to Immunotherapy
- Molecular Profiling Improves Diagnosis for Children with High Risk Cancers
- Blood Test Measures Immune Response to Epstein-Barr Virus in MS Patients
- AI Predicts Tumor-Killing Cells with High Accuracy
- Diagnostic Blood Test for Cellular Rejection after Organ Transplant Could Replace Surgical Biopsies