Clinical Utility of Anti-Platelet Factor 4 ELISA Test Characterized
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 29 Nov 2015 |
Diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a potentially catastrophic immune-mediated disorder, continues to pose significant challenges for clinicians, as both clinical and laboratory tools lack specificity.
There is mounting evidence supporting a positive correlation between definitive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and optical density (OD) positivity from the widely available anti-platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (PF4 ELISAs); however, the clinical features distinguishing these patients remain poorly understood.
Scientists at the NYU Langone Medical Center (New York, NY, USA) conducted a case-controlled, retrospective chart review of patients from two large, urban academic institutions who underwent a PF4 ELISA at a central laboratory between July 1, 2009, and July 1, 2014. PF4 ELISA assay is a polyimmunoglobulin assay (anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG)/IgAIg/M) utilizing 60 units of heparin in the positive control. Internal positive and negative control values were recorded for each patient’s PF4 ELISA.
The PF4 ELISA testing was performed using the LIFECODES PF4 Enhanced assay kit (Immucor GTI Diagnostics, Inc., Waukesha, WI, USA). In total, 184 negative patients (OD less than 0.7), and 121 positive patients (OD greater than 0.7), including 74 low-positive patients (0.7, OD less than 1.4) and 47 high-positive patients (OD greater than 1.4) were identified. Several clinical variables were significantly different in the negative group compared with the positive group, including hospital day, previous admission within the past three months, and the presence of a new thrombus. However, many of these variables were not different between the negative and low-positive group, and were only distinct between the negative and high-positive group. When the low-positive and high-positive groups were compared, only the 4T score was significantly different.
The authors concluded that patients with high-positive ODs represent a distinct clinical group when compared with low-positive ODs. However, no single characteristic analyzed was able to distinguish those with a low-positive PF4 ELISA OD and those with a high-positive PF4 ELISA OD. Our findings reinforce the clinical utility of the 4T score, which was the only clinical variable that significantly distinguished low-positive and high-positive groups. The study was published on November 19, 2015, in the Journal of Blood Medicine.
Related Links:
NYU Langone Medical Center
Immucor GTI Diagnostics, Inc.
There is mounting evidence supporting a positive correlation between definitive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and optical density (OD) positivity from the widely available anti-platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (PF4 ELISAs); however, the clinical features distinguishing these patients remain poorly understood.
Scientists at the NYU Langone Medical Center (New York, NY, USA) conducted a case-controlled, retrospective chart review of patients from two large, urban academic institutions who underwent a PF4 ELISA at a central laboratory between July 1, 2009, and July 1, 2014. PF4 ELISA assay is a polyimmunoglobulin assay (anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG)/IgAIg/M) utilizing 60 units of heparin in the positive control. Internal positive and negative control values were recorded for each patient’s PF4 ELISA.
The PF4 ELISA testing was performed using the LIFECODES PF4 Enhanced assay kit (Immucor GTI Diagnostics, Inc., Waukesha, WI, USA). In total, 184 negative patients (OD less than 0.7), and 121 positive patients (OD greater than 0.7), including 74 low-positive patients (0.7, OD less than 1.4) and 47 high-positive patients (OD greater than 1.4) were identified. Several clinical variables were significantly different in the negative group compared with the positive group, including hospital day, previous admission within the past three months, and the presence of a new thrombus. However, many of these variables were not different between the negative and low-positive group, and were only distinct between the negative and high-positive group. When the low-positive and high-positive groups were compared, only the 4T score was significantly different.
The authors concluded that patients with high-positive ODs represent a distinct clinical group when compared with low-positive ODs. However, no single characteristic analyzed was able to distinguish those with a low-positive PF4 ELISA OD and those with a high-positive PF4 ELISA OD. Our findings reinforce the clinical utility of the 4T score, which was the only clinical variable that significantly distinguished low-positive and high-positive groups. The study was published on November 19, 2015, in the Journal of Blood Medicine.
Related Links:
NYU Langone Medical Center
Immucor GTI Diagnostics, Inc.
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get complete access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
- Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
- Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
- Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
- Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
- Free breaking news sent via email
- Free access to Events Calendar
- Free access to LinkXpress new product services
- REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Sign in: Registered website members
Sign in: Registered magazine subscribers
Latest Hematology News
- Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns
- First 4-in-1 Nucleic Acid Test for Arbovirus Screening to Reduce Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Infections
- POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
- First Affordable and Rapid Test for Beta Thalassemia Demonstrates 99% Diagnostic Accuracy
- Handheld White Blood Cell Tracker to Enable Rapid Testing For Infections
- Smart Palm-size Optofluidic Hematology Analyzer Enables POCT of Patients’ Blood Cells
- Automated Hematology Platform Offers High Throughput Analytical Performance
- New Tool Analyzes Blood Platelets Faster, Easily and Accurately
- First Rapid-Result Hematology Analyzer Reports Measures of Infection and Severity at POC
- Bleeding Risk Diagnostic Test to Reduce Preventable Complications in Hospitals
- True POC Hematology Analyzer with Direct Capillary Sampling Enhances Ease-of-Use and Testing Throughput
- Point of Care CBC Analyzer with Direct Capillary Sampling Enhances Ease-of-Use and Testing Throughput
- Blood Test Could Predict Outcomes in Emergency Department and Hospital Admissions
- Novel Technology Diagnoses Immunothrombosis Using Breath Gas Analysis
- Advanced Hematology System Allows Labs to Process Up To 119 Complete Blood Count Results per Hour
- Unique AI-Based Approach Automates Clinical Analysis of Blood Data