Genetic and Lifestyle Factors Effect Biomarker Variation
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 01 Sep 2014 |
Ideal biomarkers used for disease diagnosis should display deviating levels in affected individuals only and be robust to factors unrelated to the disease.
A detailed understanding of potential confounding factors and their effect size is therefore a necessary prerequisite in the evaluation of the rapidly growing number of candidate biomarkers.
Scientists at the Uppsala University (Sweden) analyzed 92 potential protein biomarkers for cancer and inflammation in plasma from 1,005 individuals in a longitudinal cross-sectional population-based study. The biomarkers analyzed constituted an exploration panel directed against multiple cancers and also contain proteins implicated in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Graves’ disease.
For the proximity extension assay protein levels in plasma were analyzed using the Proseek Multiplex Oncology I 96 × 96 kit (Olink Bioscience; Uppsala, Sweden) and quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the BioMark HD) real-time PCR platform (Fluidigm; South San Francisco, CA, USA). The team selected 100 individuals, for Whole-Exome Sequencing using the SureSelect system for exome capture (Agilent; Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the SOLiD 5500xl instrumentation for sequencing (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA, USA).
The scientists found that for 75% of the biomarkers, the levels are significantly heritable and genome-wide association studies identified 16 novel loci and replicate two previously known loci with strong effects on one or several of the biomarkers. Integrative analysis attributes as much as 56.3% of the observed variance to non-disease factors. They proposed that information on the biomarker-specific profile of major genetic, clinical and lifestyle factors should be used to establish personalized clinical cutoffs, and that this would increase the sensitivity of using biomarkers for prediction of clinical end points.
Stefan Enroth, PhD, the lead author of the study, said, “These results are important, as they show which variables are significant for variations in the measurable values. If these factors are known, we have a greater possibility of seeing variations and we get clearer breakpoints between elevated values and normal values. By extension this may lead to the possibility of using more biomarkers clinically.” The study was published on August 22, 2014, in the journal Nature Communications.
Related Links:
Uppsala University
Olink Bioscience
Fluidigm
A detailed understanding of potential confounding factors and their effect size is therefore a necessary prerequisite in the evaluation of the rapidly growing number of candidate biomarkers.
Scientists at the Uppsala University (Sweden) analyzed 92 potential protein biomarkers for cancer and inflammation in plasma from 1,005 individuals in a longitudinal cross-sectional population-based study. The biomarkers analyzed constituted an exploration panel directed against multiple cancers and also contain proteins implicated in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Graves’ disease.
For the proximity extension assay protein levels in plasma were analyzed using the Proseek Multiplex Oncology I 96 × 96 kit (Olink Bioscience; Uppsala, Sweden) and quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the BioMark HD) real-time PCR platform (Fluidigm; South San Francisco, CA, USA). The team selected 100 individuals, for Whole-Exome Sequencing using the SureSelect system for exome capture (Agilent; Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the SOLiD 5500xl instrumentation for sequencing (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA, USA).
The scientists found that for 75% of the biomarkers, the levels are significantly heritable and genome-wide association studies identified 16 novel loci and replicate two previously known loci with strong effects on one or several of the biomarkers. Integrative analysis attributes as much as 56.3% of the observed variance to non-disease factors. They proposed that information on the biomarker-specific profile of major genetic, clinical and lifestyle factors should be used to establish personalized clinical cutoffs, and that this would increase the sensitivity of using biomarkers for prediction of clinical end points.
Stefan Enroth, PhD, the lead author of the study, said, “These results are important, as they show which variables are significant for variations in the measurable values. If these factors are known, we have a greater possibility of seeing variations and we get clearer breakpoints between elevated values and normal values. By extension this may lead to the possibility of using more biomarkers clinically.” The study was published on August 22, 2014, in the journal Nature Communications.
Related Links:
Uppsala University
Olink Bioscience
Fluidigm
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get complete access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
- Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
- Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
- Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
- Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
- Free breaking news sent via email
- Free access to Events Calendar
- Free access to LinkXpress new product services
- REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Sign in: Registered website members
Sign in: Registered magazine subscribers
Latest Clinical Chem. News
- 3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models
- POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection
- Highly Reliable Cell-Based Assay Enables Accurate Diagnosis of Endocrine Diseases
- New Blood Testing Method Detects Potent Opioids in Under Three Minutes
- Wireless Hepatitis B Test Kit Completes Screening and Data Collection in One Step
- Pain-Free, Low-Cost, Sensitive, Radiation-Free Device Detects Breast Cancer in Urine
- Spit Test Detects Breast Cancer in Five Seconds
- Electrochemical Sensors with Next-Generation Coating Advances Precision Diagnostics at POC
- First-Of-Its-Kind Handheld Device Accurately Detects Fentanyl in Urine within Seconds
- New Fluorescent Sensor Array Lights up Alzheimer’s-Related Proteins for Earlier Detection
- Automated Mass Spectrometry-Based Clinical Analyzer Could Transform Lab Testing
- Highly Sensitive pH Sensor to Aid Detection of Cancers and Vector-Borne Viruses
- Non-Invasive Sensor Monitors Changes in Saliva Compositions to Rapidly Diagnose Diabetes
- Breakthrough Immunoassays to Aid in Risk Assessment of Preeclampsia
- Urine Test for Monitoring Changes in Kidney Health Markers Can Predict New-Onset Heart Failure
- AACC Releases Comprehensive Diabetes Testing Guidelines