Commercial RT-PCR Tests Compared to Culture for Bacterial Gastroenteritis
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 11 Jan 2022 |

Image: ProGastro SSCS is a multiplex real time PCR for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, (C. jejuni and C. coli only, undifferentiated) nucleic acids and Shiga Toxin 1 (stx1) and Shiga Toxin 2 (stx2) genes (Photo courtesy of Hologic)
Nucleic acid-based testing (culture-independent diagnostic testing, CIDT) for bacterial gastroenteritis offers three major advantages over culture-based diagnosis: it has better analytical sensitivity, is less labor intensive through automation, and has faster turnaround times.
Multiple commercial nucleic acid test assays (i.e. real-time PCR, RT-PCR) are available, testing at a minimum of four pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Shigella). However, there are many caveats associated with CIDT for bacterial gastroenteritis, and gaps in the evaluation of commercial assays.
Clinical Microbiologists at the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB, Canada) and their colleagues used clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were for a comparison of four commercial RT-PCR tests. The four tests were: RIDAGENE Bacterial Stool Panel and EHEC/EPEC Panel (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany); FTD Bacterial Gastroenteritis assay (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg); BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel and Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel (BD Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada); Prodesse ProGastr SSCS Assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
The four commercial RT-PCR assays were challenged with 67 contrived stool specimens, each spiked with an isolate representing different Campylobacter species, Salmonella serotypes, Shigella species and serotypes, STEC toxin subtypes, Y. enterocolitica serotypes/biotypes, and Yersina spp; these isolates are the common circulating types in Alberta, Canada. All assays gave positive results for C. jejuni, C. coli, Y. enterocolitica, and all species and serotypes of Shigella, but negative results for Y. non-enterocoltica spp. and C. upsaliensis. Most Shiga toxin subtypes were detected by all assays except for stx2f, which was detected by Ridagene.
The performance of the four commercial assays was assessed using 171 clinical fecal specimens collected prospectively, which were initially tested by culture at the frontline diagnostic laboratories. This included feces that were 125 culture-positive or 46 culture-negative for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, STEC, or Y. enterocolitica. Using culture as a reference standard, the sensitivity for all organisms (excluding Yersinia) was >96% for all four assays and specificity was >90%, except for BD Max (87%).
The authors concluded that their study provided a third-party evaluation of four commercially available RT-PCR assays for bacterial gastroenteritis and demonstrated the assays to be mostly equivalent to each other and culture with a few caveats. Depending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens. The study was published on January 1, 2022 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
University of Calgary
R-Biopharm
Fast Track Diagnostics
BD Canada
Hologic
Multiple commercial nucleic acid test assays (i.e. real-time PCR, RT-PCR) are available, testing at a minimum of four pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Shigella). However, there are many caveats associated with CIDT for bacterial gastroenteritis, and gaps in the evaluation of commercial assays.
Clinical Microbiologists at the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB, Canada) and their colleagues used clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were for a comparison of four commercial RT-PCR tests. The four tests were: RIDAGENE Bacterial Stool Panel and EHEC/EPEC Panel (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany); FTD Bacterial Gastroenteritis assay (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg); BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel and Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel (BD Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada); Prodesse ProGastr SSCS Assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
The four commercial RT-PCR assays were challenged with 67 contrived stool specimens, each spiked with an isolate representing different Campylobacter species, Salmonella serotypes, Shigella species and serotypes, STEC toxin subtypes, Y. enterocolitica serotypes/biotypes, and Yersina spp; these isolates are the common circulating types in Alberta, Canada. All assays gave positive results for C. jejuni, C. coli, Y. enterocolitica, and all species and serotypes of Shigella, but negative results for Y. non-enterocoltica spp. and C. upsaliensis. Most Shiga toxin subtypes were detected by all assays except for stx2f, which was detected by Ridagene.
The performance of the four commercial assays was assessed using 171 clinical fecal specimens collected prospectively, which were initially tested by culture at the frontline diagnostic laboratories. This included feces that were 125 culture-positive or 46 culture-negative for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, STEC, or Y. enterocolitica. Using culture as a reference standard, the sensitivity for all organisms (excluding Yersinia) was >96% for all four assays and specificity was >90%, except for BD Max (87%).
The authors concluded that their study provided a third-party evaluation of four commercially available RT-PCR assays for bacterial gastroenteritis and demonstrated the assays to be mostly equivalent to each other and culture with a few caveats. Depending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens. The study was published on January 1, 2022 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
University of Calgary
R-Biopharm
Fast Track Diagnostics
BD Canada
Hologic
Latest Microbiology News
- Credit Card-Sized Test Boosts TB Detection in HIV Hotspots
- Fecal Metabolite Profiling Predicts Mortality in Critically Ill Patients
- Portable Molecular POC System Rules Out UTIs in Just 35 Minutes
- POC Lateral Flow Test Detects Deadly Fungal Infection Faster Than Existing Techniques
- Rapid Diagnostic Test Slashes Sepsis Mortality by 39%
- Blood Culture Assay Enhances Diagnostic Stewardship Through Targeted Panel Selection
- Real-Time Genome Sequencing Detects Dangerous Superbug Causing Hospital Infections
- Diagnostic Test Accurately Detects Colorectal Cancer by Identifying Microbial Signature in Gut Bacteria
- Rapid Bedside Test Predicts Sepsis with Over 90% Accuracy
- New Blood Test Detects Up to Five Infectious Diseases at POC
- Molecular Stool Test Shows Potential for Diagnosing TB in Adults with HIV
- New Test Diagnoses Bacterial Meningitis Quickly and Accurately
- Handheld Device Delivers Low-Cost TB Results in Less Than One Hour
- New AI-Based Method Improves Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Infections
- Breakthrough Diagnostic Technology Identifies Bacterial Infections with Almost 100% Accuracy within Three Hours
- Innovative ID/AST System to Help Diagnose Infectious Diseases and Combat AMR
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
New Reference Measurement Procedure Standardizes Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Results
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) play a key role in diagnosing a wide range of infectious diseases. These tests are generally known for their high sensitivity and specificity, and they can be developed... Read more
Pen-Like Tool Quickly and Non-Invasively Detects Opioids from Skin
Opioid drugs such as fentanyl, morphine, and oxycodone are the primary substances associated with overdose cases in the United States. Standard drug screening procedures typically involve collecting blood,... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Genetic Test Could Predict Poor Outcomes in Lung Transplant Patients
Organ transplantation has dramatically transformed the management of patients suffering from organ failure. Yet, the immune system of the recipient often perceives the transplanted organ as a foreign entity,... Read more
Breakthrough Blood Test Enables Early Pancreatic Cancer Detection
Pancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. At present, there are no molecular tools available for the early detection of this disease.... Read moreHematology
view channel
Disposable Cartridge-Based Test Delivers Rapid and Accurate CBC Results
Complete Blood Count (CBC) is one of the most commonly ordered lab tests, crucial for diagnosing diseases, monitoring therapies, and conducting routine health screenings. However, more than 90% of physician... Read more
First Point-of-Care Heparin Monitoring Test Provides Results in Under 15 Minutes
Heparin dosing requires careful management to avoid both bleeding and clotting complications. In high-risk situations like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), mortality rates can reach about 50%,... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Blood Test Detects Organ Rejection in Heart Transplant Patients
Following a heart transplant, patients are required to undergo surgical biopsies so that physicians can assess the possibility of organ rejection. Rejection happens when the recipient’s immune system identifies... Read more
Liquid Biopsy Approach to Transform Diagnosis, Monitoring and Treatment of Lung Cancer
Lung cancer continues to be a major contributor to cancer-related deaths globally, with its biological complexity and diverse regulatory processes making diagnosis and treatment particularly difficult.... Read more
Computational Tool Exposes Hidden Cancer DNA Changes Influencing Treatment Resistance
Structural changes in tumor DNA are among the most damaging genetic alterations in cancer, yet they often go undetected, particularly when tissue samples are degraded or of low quality. These hidden genomic... Read morePathology
view channel
Cancer Chip Accurately Predicts Patient-Specific Chemotherapy Response
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), one of the two primary types of esophageal cancer, ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and currently lacks effective targeted therapies.... Read more
Clinical AI Solution for Automatic Breast Cancer Grading Improves Diagnostic Accuracy
Labs that use traditional image analysis methods often suffer from bottlenecks and delays. By digitizing their pathology practices, labs can streamline their work, allowing them to take on larger caseloads... Read more
Saliva-Based Testing to Enable Early Detection of Cancer, Heart Disease or Parkinson’s
Saliva is one of the most accessible biological fluids, yet it remains underutilized in clinical practice. While saliva samples are used to perform genetic tests to determine, for example, paternity, the... Read moreTechnology
view channel
New POC Biosensing Technology Improves Detection of Molecular Biomarkers
Traditional diagnostic procedures in medicine typically involve sending a patient’s blood or tissue samples to clinical laboratories, where trained scientists perform testing and data interpretation.... Read more
Enhanced Lab Data Management and AI Critical to Labs of the Future, Finds Survey
Data plays a key role in the transformation of today’s digital laboratories, acting both as a key challenge and a catalyst for innovation, as revealed by a survey of over 150 scientists.... Read moreIndustry
view channel
AMP Releases Best Practice Recommendations to Guide Clinical Laboratories Offering HRD Testing
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing identifies tumors that are unable to effectively repair DNA damage through the homologous recombination repair pathway. This deficiency is often linked... Read more