Standalone HPV Testing Recommended for Cervical Cancer Screening
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 02 Oct 2018 |
The number of deaths from cervical cancer in the USA has decreased substantially since the implementation of widespread cervical cancer screening and has declined from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100,000 women from 2000 to 2015.
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
Latest Microbiology News
- Decentralized Laboratory Network Improves Detection of Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers in Guinea
- Molecular Panel Gains WHO Emergency Use Listing to Support Ebola Outbreak Response
- Rapid Host-Response Test Aims to Predict Corticosteroid Benefit in Sepsis
- Oral and Lung Microbiome Changes Linked to Severe Long Covid Symptoms
- Study Finds Distinct Malaria Parasites Linked to Sickle Cell Trait Protection
- Rapid Urine Test Aids Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis
- Nanodroplet CRISPR Technology Supports Rapid, Multiplexed Mycobacterial Identification
- Genomic Workflow Identifies Fungal Pathogens Before Blood Cultures Turn Positive
- FDA-Cleared Multiplex PCR Test Detects 13 Respiratory Pathogens in a Single Sample
- One-Hour Molecular Panel Expands Bloodstream Infection Testing for Gram-Negative Pathogens
- FDA Clears Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility System for Positive Blood Cultures
- New Urine Test Expands Mycotoxin Analysis to 31 Markers for Broader Exposure Assessment
- Collaboration Targets Blood-Based Ebola Detection Outside Central Laboratories
- Study Finds Frequent Overlap in Antibodies to Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Pathogens
- Early-Life Gut Microbiome Changes May Help Assess Type 1 Diabetes Risk
- FDA Breakthrough-Designated Urine Panel Aims to Shorten Pathogen and Susceptibility Testing
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Blood Proteins Linked to Mortality Risk and Biological Aging Across Organ Systems
Older adults of the same chronological age can differ markedly in health, chronic disease burden, and resilience. Biological age aims to capture these differences by reflecting how rapidly the body and... Read more
Two-Step Blood Test Improves Specificity for Alzheimer’s Diagnosis
Early Alzheimer’s disease can be difficult to identify before more severe cognitive symptoms emerge. Blood tests measuring phosphorylated tau protein p-tau217 may help detect disease-related changes, but... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Spinal Fluid Liquid Biopsy May Help Clarify Uncertain Brain Tumor Findings
Brain and spinal cord tumors can be difficult to diagnose when imaging is inconclusive or tissue biopsy cannot be performed safely. MRI changes may reflect cancer, inflammation, or treatment-related effects,... Read more
New NGS Panel Detects AML Fusions at MRD-Level Sensitivity
Genomic testing for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be limited by incomplete coverage of disease-associated alterations. Fusion events may remain undetected when workflows rely on multiple assays or lack... Read more
Updated Framework Guides Assessment of Actionable Cancer Biomarkers
Cancer care increasingly relies on molecular testing to guide targeted treatment selection. Broader use of tumor sequencing has expanded the volume and diversity of biomarker data available to oncologists,... Read more
Genomic Tissue Test Predicts Metastasis and Abiraterone Benefit in High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, affecting more than 1 million men worldwide in 2013. Its clinical course varies substantially between patients, complicating efforts to identify those... Read moreHematology
view channel
New Risk-Stratification Tool Predicts Relapse After Blinatumomab in Childhood ALL
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and young people requires careful assessment of relapse risk, particularly as treatment approaches move beyond standard chemotherapy. Traditional relapse predictors... Read more
New Myelofibrosis Guidelines Recommend Expanded Genetic Testing at Diagnosis
Myelofibrosis is a rare, life-threatening blood cancer affecting up to six per 100,000 people. The disease causes scarring in the bone marrow, limiting the production of healthy blood cells and potentially... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Immune and Inflammatory Markers May Help Assess CAR T-Cell Complication Risk
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) can occur after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with autoimmune disease. Identifying which patients are more likely to develop this complication... Read more
COVID-19 and Flu Combo Test Launches With FDA Clearance
Overlapping symptoms of COVID-19 and influenza can create diagnostic uncertainty, particularly in urgent and point-of-care settings. Rapid differentiation from a single specimen can streamline triage and... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Decentralized Laboratory Network Improves Detection of Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers in Guinea
Viral hemorrhagic fevers remain a major diagnostic challenge in West Africa because their early symptoms can resemble those of other febrile illnesses. The 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic underscored the need... Read more
Molecular Panel Gains WHO Emergency Use Listing to Support Ebola Outbreak Response
The ongoing Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighboring countries has become one of the largest outbreaks of this Ebola virus species recorded to date.... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Compact PCR Thermal Cycler Launches for Routine Molecular Laboratory Workflows
Molecular laboratories rely on nucleic acid analysis to detect molecular information accurately and reproducibly across a wide range of applications. Supporting these routine workflows, a newly launched... Read more
New AI-Powered System Aims to Streamline Laboratory and Manufacturing Workflows
Scientific laboratories supporting drug development, biotechnology, and materials research increasingly rely on coordinated digital workflows to move data, samples, and activities across teams.... Read moreIndustry
view channel
Collaboration Brings Tumor-Informed MRD Monitoring to Breast Cancer Care in Abu Dhabi
For many patients, cancer treatment does not eliminate the risk of recurrence, which may occur months or years later and become harder to treat after spreading. Recurrence is often detected only after... Read more







