Standalone HPV Testing Recommended for Cervical Cancer Screening
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 02 Oct 2018 |
The number of deaths from cervical cancer in the USA has decreased substantially since the implementation of widespread cervical cancer screening and has declined from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100,000 women from 2000 to 2015.
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
Latest Microbiology News
- Stronger Laboratory Services Support Timely Melioidosis Diagnosis Amid Global Spread
- Extracellular Vesicle Biomarker May Enable Noninvasive Monitoring of H. pylori
- Rapid Molecular Screening Aims to Accelerate Hospital Infection Control for CPE
- New Protein Targets Support Diagnostics for Louse-Borne Relapsing Fever
- TORCH Infection Trends Point to Need for Tailored Screening in Pregnancy
- Automated Blood Culture System Speeds Detection of Bloodstream Infections
- New Culture Medium Speeds C. difficile Resistance Detection and Reduces Costs
- Gut Microbiome Signatures Help Identify Risk of IBD Progression
- FDA-Cleared Gastrointestinal Panel Detects 24 Pathogen Targets
- New AMR Assay Supports Rapid Infection Control Screening in Hospitals
- Diagnostic Gaps Complicate Bundibugyo Ebola Outbreak Response in Congo
- Study Finds Hidden Mpox Infections May Drive Ongoing Spread
- Large-Scale Genomic Surveillance Tracks Resistant Bacteria Across European Hospitals
- Molecular Urine and Stool Tests Do Not Improve Early TB Treatment in Hospitalized HIV Patients
- Rapid Antigen Biosensor Detects Active Tuberculosis in One Hour
- Label-Free Microscopy Method Enables Faster, Quantitative Detection of Malaria
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Maternal Blood Biomarkers Identify Risk of Preterm and Early-Term Birth
Preterm and early-term births can lead to lasting complications because vital organs continue to mature during the final weeks of pregnancy. Babies born too soon face increased risks of breathing difficulties,... Read more
Blood-Based Alzheimer’s Testing Platform Offers Rapid Results
Accurate identification of Alzheimer’s disease pathology often relies on cerebrospinal fluid analysis or positron emission tomography, which can be invasive, costly, and not widely accessible.... Read more
Simple Oral Swab Monitors Persistent Inflammation in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
Primary ciliary dyskinesia is a rare lung disease that affects about one in 7,500 to 10,000 live births worldwide. Symptoms can begin in the newborn period and progress to recurrent respiratory infections... Read more
Simple Blood-Based Cholesterol Efflux Assay Identifies High-Risk Coronary Plaque Features
Unstable coronary plaques are difficult to identify before they trigger acute cardiovascular events. Standard high-density lipoprotein (HDL) measurements do not always capture how well HDL particles function... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Spatial Map Guides Treatment Selection in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is clinically heterogeneous, with patients often responding very differently to therapy. Existing biomarkers do not fully explain these disparities, limiting precision treatment... Read more
Genomic Study Identifies Risk Regions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) affects 0.2–2% of pregnancies and typically arises after 30 weeks, presenting with intense itching of the palms and soles. Diagnosis is confirmed by elevated... Read more
Point-of-Care PCR Panel Detects RSV, Influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 in Minutes
Respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 remain major respiratory pathogens in ambulatory care. RSV is a particular priority because it can cause significant disease in infants, older adults,... Read more
Whole-Genome Sequencing Enables Genetic Diagnosis in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Neurodevelopmental disorders include autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability and can be difficult to diagnose because clinical presentations vary widely. In Italy, approximately 1% of children... Read moreHematology
view channel
Next-Generation Hematology Platform Streamlines High-Complexity Lab Workflows
Sysmex America (Chicago, IL, USA) has introduced the next generation XR-Series, centered on the XR-10 Automated Hematology Module for high-complexity laboratories. The platform builds on the widely used... Read more
Blood Eosinophil Count May Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response and Toxicity
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes across many cancers, yet only a subset of patients derive durable benefit and biomarkers to guide treatment remain limited. Eosinophils, best known for... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Lab-on-a-Chip Approach Advances Immune–Cancer Cell Interaction Analysis
Conventional cytotoxicity assays often average responses across thousands of cells, obscuring how individual immune cells engage and kill tumor cells. For immunotherapy evaluation, the precise sequence... Read more
Antibody Profiles Provide Clues to Long COVID Severity and Symptoms
Persistent symptoms after acute COVID-19 affect millions of people, causing fatigue, respiratory issues, and cognitive deficits that can be difficult to quantify with standard tests. Clinical teams lack... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Stronger Laboratory Services Support Timely Melioidosis Diagnosis Amid Global Spread
Melioidosis, a potentially fatal infection caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, remains difficult to recognize because its symptoms can mimic tuberculosis and other illnesses. The disease is considered... Read more
Extracellular Vesicle Biomarker May Enable Noninvasive Monitoring of H. pylori
Helicobacter pylori infects an estimated 43.9% of the global population, affecting approximately 4.4 billion people worldwide. In many regions, including Africa, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia, prevalence... Read more
Rapid Molecular Screening Aims to Accelerate Hospital Infection Control for CPE
Drug-resistant infections remain a critical patient-safety threat in hospitals, with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) among the most urgent concerns. In England, reports of acquired carbapenemase... Read moreTechnology
view channel
AI Platform Links Biomarker Results to Cancer Clinical Trials and Guidelines
Oncology teams must manage growing volumes of genomic data, rapidly evolving clinical trial options, and frequently updated care guidelines, all within tight clinic schedules. Translating complex tumor... Read more
Agentic AI Platform Supports Genomic Decision-Making in Oncology
Oncology care teams increasingly face the challenge of managing complex molecular diagnostics, evolving treatment options, and extensive electronic health record documentation. Translating multimodal data... Read moreIndustry
view channel
QIAGEN Enhances QIAcuity Platform with Gene Expression and Multiplexing Tools
QIAGEN (Venlo, Netherlands) has introduced additions to its QIAcuity dPCR ecosystem that focus on gene expression, expanded assay content, and workflow standardization for life sciences and biopharma users.... Read more




.jpg)



