Standalone HPV Testing Recommended for Cervical Cancer Screening
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 02 Oct 2018 |
The number of deaths from cervical cancer in the USA has decreased substantially since the implementation of widespread cervical cancer screening and has declined from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100,000 women from 2000 to 2015.
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
Latest Microbiology News
- New Bacterial Target Identified for Early Detection of Noma
- Genomic Analysis Links Emerging Streptococcal Strains to Specific Infections
- Rapid Urine Test Speeds Antibiotic Selection for UTIs
- WHO Endorses Rapid Point-of-Care Testing to Improve TB Detection
- Breath Analysis Approach Offers Rapid Detection of Bacterial Infection
- Study Highlights Accuracy Gaps in Consumer Gut Microbiome Kits
- WHO Recommends Near POC Tests, Tongue Swabs and Sputum Pooling for TB Diagnosis
- New Imaging Approach Could Help Predict Dangerous Gut Infection
- Rapid Sequencing Could Transform Tuberculosis Care
- Blood-Based Viral Signature Identified in Crohn’s Disease
- Hidden Gut Viruses Linked to Colorectal Cancer Risk
- Three-Test Panel Launched for Detection of Liver Fluke Infections
- Rapid Test Promises Faster Answers for Drug-Resistant Infections
- CRISPR-Based Technology Neutralizes Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
- Comprehensive Review Identifies Gut Microbiome Signatures Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease
- AI-Powered Platform Enables Rapid Detection of Drug-Resistant C. Auris Pathogens
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
New CLIA Status Brings Mass Spectrometry Steroid Testing to Routine Labs
Steroid hormone measurement is a core application of clinical mass spectrometry, which is widely regarded as a diagnostic gold standard. Access to these high-specificity methods has often been constrained... Read more
Study Shows Dual Biomarkers Improve Accuracy of Alzheimer’s Detection
Alzheimer’s disease develops slowly, and biological changes can appear in blood many years before symptoms. While plasma assays for phosphorylated tau offer earlier detection, discerning whether these... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Whole Genome Sequencing in Routine Care Expands Rare Disease Detection
Rare diseases often involve prolonged diagnostic journeys that delay clinical decision-making and complicate family planning. As phenotypes become more heterogeneous, sequencing-based methods are increasingly... Read more
New AI Tool Improves Detection of Genetic Causes in Rare Disorders
Families affected by rare diseases often endure years of inconclusive testing and fragmented referrals before a definitive diagnosis. Despite broad access to genomic sequencing, many patients remain undiagnosed,... Read moreHematology
view channel
Rapid Cartridge-Based Test Aims to Expand Access to Hemoglobin Disorder Diagnosis
Sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia are hemoglobin disorders that often require referral to specialized laboratories for definitive diagnosis, delaying results for patients and clinicians.... Read more
New Guidelines Aim to Improve AL Amyloidosis Diagnosis
Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, life-threatening bone marrow disorder in which abnormal amyloid proteins accumulate in organs. Approximately 3,260 people in the United States are diagnosed... Read moreImmunology
view channel
FDA Approval Expands Use of PD-L1 Companion Diagnostic in Esophageal and GEJ Carcinomas
Esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas (GEJ) have a poor prognosis, with approximately 16,250 deaths in the United States in 2025 and a five-year relative survival of 21.9%.... Read more
Study Identifies Inflammatory Pathway Driving Immunotherapy Resistance in Bladder Cancer
Bladder cancer remains a prevalent malignancy with variable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clinicians often observe elevated C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in affected patients, yet the... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
New Bacterial Target Identified for Early Detection of Noma
Noma is a rapidly progressing orofacial infection that begins as gingivitis and can destroy oral and facial tissues, primarily affecting young children living in extreme poverty. Without treatment, it... Read more
Genomic Analysis Links Emerging Streptococcal Strains to Specific Infections
Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis (SDSE) infections are increasing worldwide and include variants that may lead to severe disease. Researchers now report that whole-genome sequencing of... Read moreTechnology
view channel
New AI Tool Enables Rapid Treatment Selection in Pediatric Leukemia
Children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia face an aggressive disease that remains difficult to treat. Although remission rates have improved, many survivors experience long-term effects from intensive... Read more
Breakthrough Mass Spectrometry Design Could Enable Ultra-Low Abundance Detection
Mass spectrometry is central to identifying and quantifying molecules in complex biological samples, but conventional instruments typically analyze ions sequentially, which can limit detection of rare species.... Read moreIndustry
view channel
Takara Bio USA and Hamilton Partner Partner to Automate NGS Library Preparation
Takara Bio USA, Inc. (San Jose, CA, USA), a wholly owned subsidiary of Takara Bio Inc., and Hamilton Company (Reno, NV, USA) announced a development and co-marketing agreement to deliver integrated, automated... Read more








