Standalone HPV Testing Recommended for Cervical Cancer Screening
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 02 Oct 2018 |
The number of deaths from cervical cancer in the USA has decreased substantially since the implementation of widespread cervical cancer screening and has declined from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100,000 women from 2000 to 2015.
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
The evidence on screening for cervical cancer has been reviewed with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (co-testing) compared with cervical cytology alone.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (Rockville, MD, USA) besides reviewing and evaluating cervical cancer screening also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.
The experts reported on screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or co-testing can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. Four studies identified in the review found that primary hrHPV testing detected higher rates of stage 3 (or worse) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the standalone Pap test in the first round of testing. In comparing the Pap, hrHPV and co-testing methods, the latter two methods were associated with higher colposcopy and false-positive rates.
The scientists concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. They also concluded with high certainty that the benefits of screening every three years with cytology alone, every five years with hrHPV testing alone, or every five years with both tests (co-testing) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. The anticipation is hrHPV testing every five years for women aged 30 to 65 could reduce cervical cancer mortality from 8.34 to 0.29 deaths per 1,000 women.
Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, said, “HPV testing every five years is an attractive option for patients who want to avoid pelvic exams and Pap smears. The Pap test is well known and accepted by patients and women’s healthcare providers, and there would need to be powerful incentives to move away from it. Switching from Pap tests annually to every three years has been the USPSTF recommendation since 2012, but patient and provider preferences have been hard to change. I expect the same phenomenon will delay implementation of primary HPV screening every 5 years.” The study was published on August 21, 2018, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Related Links:
US Preventive Services Task Force
Latest Microbiology News
- WHO Endorses Rapid Point-of-Care Testing to Improve TB Detection
- Breath Analysis Approach Offers Rapid Detection of Bacterial Infection
- Study Highlights Accuracy Gaps in Consumer Gut Microbiome Kits
- WHO Recommends Near POC Tests, Tongue Swabs and Sputum Pooling for TB Diagnosis
- New Imaging Approach Could Help Predict Dangerous Gut Infection
- Rapid Sequencing Could Transform Tuberculosis Care
- Blood-Based Viral Signature Identified in Crohn’s Disease
- Hidden Gut Viruses Linked to Colorectal Cancer Risk
- Three-Test Panel Launched for Detection of Liver Fluke Infections
- Rapid Test Promises Faster Answers for Drug-Resistant Infections
- CRISPR-Based Technology Neutralizes Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
- Comprehensive Review Identifies Gut Microbiome Signatures Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease
- AI-Powered Platform Enables Rapid Detection of Drug-Resistant C. Auris Pathogens
- New Test Measures How Effectively Antibiotics Kill Bacteria
- New Antimicrobial Stewardship Standards for TB Care to Optimize Diagnostics
- New UTI Diagnosis Method Delivers Antibiotic Resistance Results 24 Hours Earlier
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
New CLIA Status Brings Mass Spectrometry Steroid Testing to Routine Labs
Steroid hormone measurement is a core application of clinical mass spectrometry, which is widely regarded as a diagnostic gold standard. Access to these high-specificity methods has often been constrained... Read more
Study Shows Dual Biomarkers Improve Accuracy of Alzheimer’s Detection
Alzheimer’s disease develops slowly, and biological changes can appear in blood many years before symptoms. While plasma assays for phosphorylated tau offer earlier detection, discerning whether these... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
First IVDR‑Certified IGH Clonality Assay Supports Diagnosis of B-Cell Malignancies
Accurate identification of clonal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene rearrangements is central to evaluating suspected B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, where a single B-cell clone yields a defining... Read more
Plasma ctDNA Testing Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Therapy
Accurate identification of breast cancer patients at risk of relapse after pre-surgery treatment is central to guiding adjuvant decisions, particularly in aggressive disease. Circulating fragments of tumor... Read moreHematology
view channel
Rapid Cartridge-Based Test Aims to Expand Access to Hemoglobin Disorder Diagnosis
Sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia are hemoglobin disorders that often require referral to specialized laboratories for definitive diagnosis, delaying results for patients and clinicians.... Read more
New Guidelines Aim to Improve AL Amyloidosis Diagnosis
Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, life-threatening bone marrow disorder in which abnormal amyloid proteins accumulate in organs. Approximately 3,260 people in the United States are diagnosed... Read moreImmunology
view channel
FDA Approval Expands Use of PD-L1 Companion Diagnostic in Esophageal and GEJ Carcinomas
Esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas (GEJ) have a poor prognosis, with approximately 16,250 deaths in the United States in 2025 and a five-year relative survival of 21.9%.... Read more
Study Identifies Inflammatory Pathway Driving Immunotherapy Resistance in Bladder Cancer
Bladder cancer remains a prevalent malignancy with variable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clinicians often observe elevated C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in affected patients, yet the... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
WHO Endorses Rapid Point-of-Care Testing to Improve TB Detection
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading infectious killer, with more than 3,300 deaths and 29,000 new illnesses every day. Diagnostic delays and dependence on centralized laboratory networks continue to impede... Read more
Breath Analysis Approach Offers Rapid Detection of Bacterial Infection
Accurate and rapid identification of bacterial infections remains challenging in acute care, where delays can hinder timely, targeted therapy. Infectious diseases are a major cause of mortality worldwide,... Read more
Study Highlights Accuracy Gaps in Consumer Gut Microbiome Kits
Direct-to-consumer gut microbiome kits promise personalized insights by profiling fecal bacteria and generating health readouts, but their analytical accuracy remains uncertain. A new study shows that... Read more
WHO Recommends Near POC Tests, Tongue Swabs and Sputum Pooling for TB Diagnosis
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the world’s leading infectious disease killers, yet millions of cases go undiagnosed or are detected too late. Barriers such as reliance on sputum samples, limited laboratory... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Rapid Biosensor Detects Drug Sensitivity in Breast Tumors
Chemotherapy selection for breast cancer is challenged by heterogeneous tumor responses. Conventional chemosensitivity assays can be slow, require large sample volumes, and struggle with complex biological... Read more
Online Tool Supports Family Screening for Inherited Cancer Risk
Genetic test results in oncology often have implications for relatives who may share inherited cancer risk. Many health systems lack structured processes to help patients alert family members, limiting... Read moreIndustry
view channel
Integrated DNA Technologies Expands into Clinical Diagnostics
Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT; Coralville, Iowa, USA) has announced the launch of Archer FUSIONPlex-HT Dx and VARIANTPlex-HT Dx. This launch marks the company’s first in vitro diagnostic (IVD) offerings... Read more








