Fluorescent Lymphocytes and Smudge Cells Explored in Infectious Mononucleosis
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 30 Aug 2021 |
Image: The Sysmex DI-60 is an automated, cell-locating image analysis system. It is connected directly to the analyzer track and therefore eliminates the need for manual intervention in the hematology workflow in the imaging cycle (Photo courtesy of Sysmex Corporation)
Infectious mononucleosis (also known as Glandular fever) is an infection most commonly caused by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which is a human herpes virus. Glandular fever is not particularly contagious. It is spread mainly through contact with saliva, such as through kissing, or sharing food and drink utensils.
The mono test is 71% to 90% accurate and may be used as an initial test for diagnosing infectious mononucleosis (IM). However, the test does have a 25% false-negative rate due to the fact that some people infected with EBV do not produce the heterophile antibodies that the mono test is designed to detect. Atypical lymphocytes appear, but the heterophilic agglutination test is negative.
Clinical Laboratorians at the Peking University Third Hospital (Beijing, China) enrolled in a study 62 IM patients, 67 healthy controls, 84 patients with upper respiratory tract virus infection, and 35 patients with malignant lymphoid diseases, to explore the diagnostic value of high fluorescent lymphocytes (HFLC) and smudge cells for infectious mononucleosis (IM). The complete blood counts and leukocyte differential counts were tested, and the smudge cells were manually counted.
Complete blood counts including red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cells (WBC), and leukocyte differential count, platelet (PLT), and HFLC percentage (HFLC%) were investigated with the Sysmex XN 9000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). Manual leukocyte classification and smudge cells were counted by Sysmex DI-60. A total of 200 nucleated cells were read on each slide. The number of smudge cells seen per 100 nucleated cells was counted, and the blood smears were observed by two experienced technicians under an optical microscope.
The investigators reported that the value of HFLC% and smudge cells of the IM group were significantly higher than those of healthy controls and disease controls, and the HFLC% value of IM patients was positively correlated with the number of reactive lymphocytes. When the cutoff value of HFLC% was 0.4%, and of IM was high (AUC = 0.995). When the smudge cells >2/100 nucleated cells, the diagnostic value was further enhanced (AUC = 1.000). When the cutoff value of the HFLC% was 1.2%, it effectively distinguished IM patients from upper respiratory tract virus infection patients (AUC = 0.934). When smudge cells >16/100 nucleated cells, it also has high differential diagnosis value (AUC = 0.913). The combination HFLC% and smudge cells for the differential diagnosis can be increased to 0.968.
The authors concluded that HFLC% and smudge cells can be used as effective indicators in the early diagnosis and differential diagnosis of IM. HFLC% assists the diagnosis of IM with the following advantages: first, this indicator has high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of IM, which can effectively avoid missed diagnosed; second, HFLC%, as one of the blood routine indicators, can be obtained directly from the automatic blood analyzer. The study was published on August 17, 2021 in the Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.
Related Links:
Peking University Third Hospital
Sysmex Corporation
The mono test is 71% to 90% accurate and may be used as an initial test for diagnosing infectious mononucleosis (IM). However, the test does have a 25% false-negative rate due to the fact that some people infected with EBV do not produce the heterophile antibodies that the mono test is designed to detect. Atypical lymphocytes appear, but the heterophilic agglutination test is negative.
Clinical Laboratorians at the Peking University Third Hospital (Beijing, China) enrolled in a study 62 IM patients, 67 healthy controls, 84 patients with upper respiratory tract virus infection, and 35 patients with malignant lymphoid diseases, to explore the diagnostic value of high fluorescent lymphocytes (HFLC) and smudge cells for infectious mononucleosis (IM). The complete blood counts and leukocyte differential counts were tested, and the smudge cells were manually counted.
Complete blood counts including red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cells (WBC), and leukocyte differential count, platelet (PLT), and HFLC percentage (HFLC%) were investigated with the Sysmex XN 9000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). Manual leukocyte classification and smudge cells were counted by Sysmex DI-60. A total of 200 nucleated cells were read on each slide. The number of smudge cells seen per 100 nucleated cells was counted, and the blood smears were observed by two experienced technicians under an optical microscope.
The investigators reported that the value of HFLC% and smudge cells of the IM group were significantly higher than those of healthy controls and disease controls, and the HFLC% value of IM patients was positively correlated with the number of reactive lymphocytes. When the cutoff value of HFLC% was 0.4%, and of IM was high (AUC = 0.995). When the smudge cells >2/100 nucleated cells, the diagnostic value was further enhanced (AUC = 1.000). When the cutoff value of the HFLC% was 1.2%, it effectively distinguished IM patients from upper respiratory tract virus infection patients (AUC = 0.934). When smudge cells >16/100 nucleated cells, it also has high differential diagnosis value (AUC = 0.913). The combination HFLC% and smudge cells for the differential diagnosis can be increased to 0.968.
The authors concluded that HFLC% and smudge cells can be used as effective indicators in the early diagnosis and differential diagnosis of IM. HFLC% assists the diagnosis of IM with the following advantages: first, this indicator has high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of IM, which can effectively avoid missed diagnosed; second, HFLC%, as one of the blood routine indicators, can be obtained directly from the automatic blood analyzer. The study was published on August 17, 2021 in the Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.
Related Links:
Peking University Third Hospital
Sysmex Corporation
Latest Hematology News
- Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns
- First 4-in-1 Nucleic Acid Test for Arbovirus Screening to Reduce Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Infections
- POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
- First Affordable and Rapid Test for Beta Thalassemia Demonstrates 99% Diagnostic Accuracy
- Handheld White Blood Cell Tracker to Enable Rapid Testing For Infections
- Smart Palm-size Optofluidic Hematology Analyzer Enables POCT of Patients’ Blood Cells
- Automated Hematology Platform Offers High Throughput Analytical Performance
- New Tool Analyzes Blood Platelets Faster, Easily and Accurately
- First Rapid-Result Hematology Analyzer Reports Measures of Infection and Severity at POC
- Bleeding Risk Diagnostic Test to Reduce Preventable Complications in Hospitals
- True POC Hematology Analyzer with Direct Capillary Sampling Enhances Ease-of-Use and Testing Throughput
- Point of Care CBC Analyzer with Direct Capillary Sampling Enhances Ease-of-Use and Testing Throughput
- Blood Test Could Predict Outcomes in Emergency Department and Hospital Admissions
- Novel Technology Diagnoses Immunothrombosis Using Breath Gas Analysis
- Advanced Hematology System Allows Labs to Process Up To 119 Complete Blood Count Results per Hour
- Unique AI-Based Approach Automates Clinical Analysis of Blood Data