Accuracy of Self-Sampling for HPV Screening Evaluated
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 13 Feb 2019 |

Image: An Evalyn Brush used for patient self-sampling of the cervico-vaginal area (Photo courtesy of Rovers Medical Devices).
Molecular testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) using patient-collected cervico-vaginal samples has shown similar levels of accuracy to testing done on clinician-collected samples and could boost participation in overall HPV screening.
Detecting cancer lesions in women who periodically attend clinics can be more difficult than detecting them in underscreened women who have rarely or never been screened, or have refused to attend clinics following an invitation from a screening organization.
Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) examined 7,643 women aged 29 to 61 years in a self-sampling group and 6,282 in a clinician-collected sampling group. The primary endpoints of the study were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and worse or grade 3 and worse (CIN2+ or CIN3+). The women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush; or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush also from Rovers Medical Devices BV.
All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Of the self-collecting patients, 569, or 7.4%, tested positive for HPV, while in the physician-collected group, 451, or 7.2% tested positive. The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between the two groups, while CIN3+ relative sensitivity was 0.99 with essentially equivalent specificity.
The authors concluded that HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary. Johannes Berkhof, PhD, a professor and a co-author of the study, said, “"Self-collection has potential to become a first screening test in many different countries. It creates a high participation rate, which is difficult to achieve. We have cleared the first hurdle, but now we need to see how we can implement this kind of screening.” The study was published on January 15, 2019, in the journal Lancet Oncology.
Related Links:
Vrije Universiteit
Detecting cancer lesions in women who periodically attend clinics can be more difficult than detecting them in underscreened women who have rarely or never been screened, or have refused to attend clinics following an invitation from a screening organization.
Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) examined 7,643 women aged 29 to 61 years in a self-sampling group and 6,282 in a clinician-collected sampling group. The primary endpoints of the study were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and worse or grade 3 and worse (CIN2+ or CIN3+). The women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush; or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush also from Rovers Medical Devices BV.
All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Of the self-collecting patients, 569, or 7.4%, tested positive for HPV, while in the physician-collected group, 451, or 7.2% tested positive. The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between the two groups, while CIN3+ relative sensitivity was 0.99 with essentially equivalent specificity.
The authors concluded that HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary. Johannes Berkhof, PhD, a professor and a co-author of the study, said, “"Self-collection has potential to become a first screening test in many different countries. It creates a high participation rate, which is difficult to achieve. We have cleared the first hurdle, but now we need to see how we can implement this kind of screening.” The study was published on January 15, 2019, in the journal Lancet Oncology.
Related Links:
Vrije Universiteit
Latest Microbiology News
- H. pylori Screening Within Colorectal Program Aids Gastric Cancer Prevention
- Machine Learning Reveals Consistent Gut Microbiome Patterns in Colorectal Cancer
- Study Reveals Widespread Community Spread of Drug-Resistant Klebsiella
- Stronger Laboratory Services Support Timely Melioidosis Diagnosis Amid Global Spread
- Extracellular Vesicle Biomarker May Enable Noninvasive Monitoring of H. pylori
- Rapid Molecular Screening Aims to Accelerate Hospital Infection Control for CPE
- New Protein Targets Support Diagnostics for Louse-Borne Relapsing Fever
- TORCH Infection Trends Point to Need for Tailored Screening in Pregnancy
- Automated Blood Culture System Speeds Detection of Bloodstream Infections
- New Culture Medium Speeds C. difficile Resistance Detection and Reduces Costs
- Gut Microbiome Signatures Help Identify Risk of IBD Progression
- FDA-Cleared Gastrointestinal Panel Detects 24 Pathogen Targets
- New AMR Assay Supports Rapid Infection Control Screening in Hospitals
- Diagnostic Gaps Complicate Bundibugyo Ebola Outbreak Response in Congo
- Study Finds Hidden Mpox Infections May Drive Ongoing Spread
- Large-Scale Genomic Surveillance Tracks Resistant Bacteria Across European Hospitals
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
FDA-Approved Test Identifies Low Risk of Large Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis
Chronic liver disease contributes substantially to mortality, and clinicians routinely screen adults with compensated cirrhosis for varices to prevent bleeding. However, endoscopy is invasive and reso... Read more
Blood Protein Signature Diagnoses Pediatric IBD and Distinguishes Subtypes
Confirming pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires imaging, endoscopy, and histopathology, prolonging time to diagnosis. Reliable, noninvasive blood tests remain an unmet need in routine... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Blood Test Reveals Hidden Pancreatic Cancer After Treatment
Pancreatic cancer often returns even after chemotherapy and surgery, while microscopic disease can remain difficult to detect during surveillance. Standard imaging and broad-panel liquid biopsy tests may... Read more
Model Predicts Increased ALS Clinic Visits with Expanded Genetic Testing
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that rapidly impairs motor function and shortens survival, creating sustained demand for multidisciplinary care.... Read moreHematology
view channel
Next-Generation Hematology Platform Streamlines High-Complexity Lab Workflows
Sysmex America (Chicago, IL, USA) has introduced the next generation XR-Series, centered on the XR-10 Automated Hematology Module for high-complexity laboratories. The platform builds on the widely used... Read more
Blood Eosinophil Count May Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response and Toxicity
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes across many cancers, yet only a subset of patients derive durable benefit and biomarkers to guide treatment remain limited. Eosinophils, best known for... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Emergency Department Opt-Out Testing Program Identifies Undiagnosed HIV
Undiagnosed HIV continues to drive avoidable morbidity and transmission, with many people identified only after substantial immune damage has occurred. In England, about one in 20 people living with HIV... Read more
Immune Biomarkers Could Identify Risk of Chronic Critical Illness on ICU Admission
Severe traumatic injury can trigger immune and organ dysfunction that complicates recovery in the intensive care unit. A subset of patients develop chronic critical illness, defined as dependence on intensive... Read morePathology
view channel
Uncertainty-Aware AI Tool Improves Digital Pathology for Cancer Subtyping
Reliable histologic subtyping guides therapy selection in oncology, yet diagnostic workflows grow more complex as whole-slide imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) expand. A persistent obstacle to clinical... Read more
Study Highlights Biomarker Testing Delays in Lung Cancer Care
Timely biomarker results are critical to match lung cancer patients with targeted therapies or immunotherapies, yet many clinical pathways still delay testing after biopsy. Ordering responsibility, reimbursement... Read moreTechnology
view channel
AI Platform Links Biomarker Results to Cancer Clinical Trials and Guidelines
Oncology teams must manage growing volumes of genomic data, rapidly evolving clinical trial options, and frequently updated care guidelines, all within tight clinic schedules. Translating complex tumor... Read more
Agentic AI Platform Supports Genomic Decision-Making in Oncology
Oncology care teams increasingly face the challenge of managing complex molecular diagnostics, evolving treatment options, and extensive electronic health record documentation. Translating multimodal data... Read moreIndustry
view channel








