Accuracy of Self-Sampling for HPV Screening Evaluated
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 13 Feb 2019 |

Image: An Evalyn Brush used for patient self-sampling of the cervico-vaginal area (Photo courtesy of Rovers Medical Devices).
Molecular testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) using patient-collected cervico-vaginal samples has shown similar levels of accuracy to testing done on clinician-collected samples and could boost participation in overall HPV screening.
Detecting cancer lesions in women who periodically attend clinics can be more difficult than detecting them in underscreened women who have rarely or never been screened, or have refused to attend clinics following an invitation from a screening organization.
Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) examined 7,643 women aged 29 to 61 years in a self-sampling group and 6,282 in a clinician-collected sampling group. The primary endpoints of the study were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and worse or grade 3 and worse (CIN2+ or CIN3+). The women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush; or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush also from Rovers Medical Devices BV.
All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Of the self-collecting patients, 569, or 7.4%, tested positive for HPV, while in the physician-collected group, 451, or 7.2% tested positive. The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between the two groups, while CIN3+ relative sensitivity was 0.99 with essentially equivalent specificity.
The authors concluded that HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary. Johannes Berkhof, PhD, a professor and a co-author of the study, said, “"Self-collection has potential to become a first screening test in many different countries. It creates a high participation rate, which is difficult to achieve. We have cleared the first hurdle, but now we need to see how we can implement this kind of screening.” The study was published on January 15, 2019, in the journal Lancet Oncology.
Related Links:
Vrije Universiteit
Detecting cancer lesions in women who periodically attend clinics can be more difficult than detecting them in underscreened women who have rarely or never been screened, or have refused to attend clinics following an invitation from a screening organization.
Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) examined 7,643 women aged 29 to 61 years in a self-sampling group and 6,282 in a clinician-collected sampling group. The primary endpoints of the study were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and worse or grade 3 and worse (CIN2+ or CIN3+). The women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush; or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush also from Rovers Medical Devices BV.
All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Of the self-collecting patients, 569, or 7.4%, tested positive for HPV, while in the physician-collected group, 451, or 7.2% tested positive. The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between the two groups, while CIN3+ relative sensitivity was 0.99 with essentially equivalent specificity.
The authors concluded that HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary. Johannes Berkhof, PhD, a professor and a co-author of the study, said, “"Self-collection has potential to become a first screening test in many different countries. It creates a high participation rate, which is difficult to achieve. We have cleared the first hurdle, but now we need to see how we can implement this kind of screening.” The study was published on January 15, 2019, in the journal Lancet Oncology.
Related Links:
Vrije Universiteit
Latest Microbiology News
- Rapid Antigen Biosensor Detects Active Tuberculosis in One Hour
- Label-Free Microscopy Method Enables Faster, Quantitative Detection of Malaria
- Oral–Gut Microbiome Signatures Identify Early Gastric Cancer
- Gut Microbiome Test Predicts Melanoma Recurrence After Surgery
- Rapid Blood-Culture Susceptibility Panel Expands Coverage for Gram-Negative Infections
- Antibiotic Resistance Genes Found in Newborns Within Hours of Birth
- Rapid Color Test Stratifies Virulent and Resistant Staph Strains
- mNGS CSF Test Identifies CNS Pathogens Missed by Standard Panels
- Syndromic Panel Enables Rapid Identification of Bloodstream Infections
- RNA-Based Workflow Identifies Active Skin Microbes for Dermatology Research
- Cost-Effective Sampling and Sequencing Workflow Identifies ICU Infection Hotspots
- New Bacterial Target Identified for Early Detection of Noma
- Genomic Analysis Links Emerging Streptococcal Strains to Specific Infections
- Rapid Urine Test Speeds Antibiotic Selection for UTIs
- WHO Endorses Rapid Point-of-Care Testing to Improve TB Detection
- Breath Analysis Approach Offers Rapid Detection of Bacterial Infection
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Blood Test Detects Testicular Cancer Missed by Standard Markers
Testicular cancer most often affects adolescents and young adults and is highly treatable when found early. Diagnosis can be difficult when tumors do not produce sufficient levels of standard blood-based... Read more
Routine Blood Tests Identify Biomarkers Linked to PTSD
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with a range of chronic physical health conditions and affects multiple organ systems. Clinical laboratories routinely measure blood analytes that reflect... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
CRISPR-Based Test Identifies Multiple Respiratory Viruses Simultaneously
Respiratory virus co-circulation complicates differential diagnosis, as overlapping symptoms can obscure etiology. Multiplex testing typically depends on multiple enzymes or fluorophores and multistep... Read more
Multi-Omic Assay Predicts Recurrence and Radiation Benefit in Early Breast Cancer
Early-stage invasive breast cancer is frequently managed with breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy, but the magnitude of benefit from radiation varies among patients.... Read more
Portable Test Detects Tuberculosis from Tongue Swabs in 30 Minutes
Despite decades of effective drug regimens, tuberculosis remains the leading cause of death from an infectious disease, driven in part by limited access to accurate, rapid testing. Conventional diagnostics... Read more
Blood Test Receives FDA Breakthrough Status to Differentiate Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder
Differentiating schizophrenia from bipolar I disorder in symptomatic patients is challenging because early presentations often overlap. Current diagnostic pathways rely heavily on subjective assessments... Read moreHematology
view channel
Advanced CBC-Derived Indices Integrated into Hematology Platforms
Diatron, a STRATEC brand, has introduced six advanced hematological indices on its Aquila, Aquarius 3, and Abacus 5 hematology analyzers. The new Research Use Only (RUO) indices include Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte... Read more
Blood Test Enables Early Detection of Multiple Myeloma Relapse
Bone marrow biopsies remain central to diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma, yet the procedure is painful, invasive, and often repeated over time. Older patients—who represent most new cases—can... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Finger-Prick Lateral Flow Test Detects Sepsis Biomarkers at Point of Care
Sepsis remains a time-critical condition in which rapid risk assessment is often hindered by reliance on centralized laboratory testing. The global burden is substantial, with an estimated 166 million... Read more
Study Highlights Low Sensitivity of Current Lyme Tests in Early Infection
Accurate laboratory diagnosis of early Lyme disease remains challenging because serologic responses may be limited soon after infection. Missed detection at this stage can delay evaluation and management... Read morePathology
view channel
New Tissue Mapping Approach Identifies High-Risk Form of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic kidney disease is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease, affecting 20%–40% of people with diabetes and more than 107 million individuals worldwide as of 2021.... Read more
Multimodal AI Tool Predicts Genetic Alterations to Guide Breast Cancer Treatment
PIK3CA mutations are key biomarkers for selecting phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–targeted therapies in breast cancer, yet access to molecular testing can be inconsistent and costly. Conventional polymerase... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Microfluidic Single-Cell Assay Predicts Breast Cancer Risk
Risk stratification for breast cancer remains imprecise, as population-based models and breast density can over- or underestimate individual risk, potentially leading to over- or under-screening.... Read more







