We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Point-of-Care Diagnostic Test for Diabetes Reviewed

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 31 Aug 2016
Image: The Afinion HbA1c assay tests for quantitative determination of glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in human whole blood (Photo courtesy of Alere).
Image: The Afinion HbA1c assay tests for quantitative determination of glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in human whole blood (Photo courtesy of Alere).
Supporters of point-of-care (POC) HbA1c testing emphasized its advantages, particularly the increased access it affords patients and the potential for more timely treatment changes that could improve glycemic control. Such tests also enable clinicians to discuss the results with patients before they leave the examination room, rather than requiring a follow-up visit.

The system is identical to one already used to monitor patients with diabetes. That test has received a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) waiver and can be used in numerous POC clinical settings with no required training. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Silver Springs, MD, USA) typically convenes panels to provide a recommendation on approval. Although it is not required to follow the advice of such panels, it typically does.

In accuracy studies of the Alere Afinion HbA1c Dx, (Alere, Waltham, MA, USA) the total error estimates for the test based on venous whole blood precision estimates ranged from 2.25% to 3.16%, within the acceptance criterion for total error. The total error estimates for the test based on fingerstick whole blood ranged from 1.41% to 4.05%, also within the acceptance criterion of less than 6%. POC diabetes diagnostics is somewhat controversial. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) did not recommend such assays for diagnostic purposes in its 2016 guidelines, citing a lack of required proficiency testing. The missing support is the main reason the FDA asked for the panel review.

Robert E. Ratner, MD, the ADA chief scientific and medical officer, said, “Using the test to monitor patients already diagnosed with diabetes is appropriate because it doesn’t require the same degree of accuracy as a diagnostic test.” However, Richard Kahn, PhD, a clinical professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, disputed that claim, arguing that POC testing could improve the diagnosis of diabetes (currently about a third of people with diabetes are undiagnosed) with little risk of false positives or negatives.

Related Links:
US Food and Drug Administration
Alere
Platinum Member
Automated Coagulation Analyzer
Hemolumi H6
Gold Member
Clinical Chemistry Assay
Sorbitol Dehydrogenase (SDH)
New
Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Assay
Elecsys Phospho-Tau (217P) Plasma
Thyroid Test
Anti-Thyroid EIA Test

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Genetic Testing Program Helps Uncover Inherited Risk in Pediatric Cancer

Inherited cancer risk can affect children, adolescents and young adults, but it may not always be apparent from tumor type or family history alone. Some cancer syndromes require specialized expertise and... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Aptiva utilizes particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) (Photo courtesy of Werfen)

Werfen Expands Automated APS Testing with FDA-Cleared and CE-Marked IgA Reagent

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with thrombosis and pregnancy complications, but its symptoms can overlap with those of other conditions, complicating diagnosis.... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: Each PhAST instrument supports random-access processing of up to four samples simultaneously, delivering a throughput of up to 12 samples per eight-hour shift. (Photo courtesy of PhAST)

FDA Clears Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility System for Positive Blood Cultures

Bloodstream infections require prompt treatment, but antimicrobial susceptibility results often lag behind a positive blood culture. Conventional testing can take another 24 to 48 hours after a culture... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: ADLM recommends that emerging AI tools follow the same professional oversight, quality, validation, and monitoring standards as traditional clinical testing within CLIA’s existing framework (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

ADLM Calls for CLIA Updates to Support Safe AI Use in Laboratory Medicine

Clinical laboratories increasingly use artificial intelligence to verify, interpret, and report results, but safeguards under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) were designed in 1992.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image

Collaboration Combines AI Cognitive Assessment and RNA Blood Testing for Earlier Alzheimer’s Detection

Alzheimer’s disease is often identified only after substantial neurodegeneration, partly because current diagnostic pathways are fragmented and difficult to scale. As treatment shifts toward earlier intervention,... Read more