Melanoma Biomarkers Predict Checkpoint Blocker Response
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 02 Aug 2018 |
Image: A photomicrograph of pigmented malignant melanoma in a Papanicolaou stained cytology specimen, (Photo courtesy of Nephron).
The outlook for patients with advanced melanoma has dramatically improved in recent years because of drugs known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which mobilize the immune system to attack cancer. These drugs block checkpoint molecules that act as brakes on the immune system and unleash immune defenders such as T cells to recognize and attack cancer.
Combination anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy promotes antitumor immunity and provides superior benefit to patients with advanced-stage melanoma compared with either therapy alone. Currently, there is no way to predict response to anti–CTLA-4 cancer immunotherapy.
Scientists at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA, USA) and their colleagues examined major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II protein expression on tumor cells from previously untreated melanoma patients and correlated the results with transcriptional and genomic analyses and with clinical response to anti–CTLA-4, anti–PD-1, or combination therapy.
The team found that most (>50% of cells) or complete loss of melanoma MHC class I membrane expression was observed in 78 of 181 cases (43%), was associated with transcriptional repression of HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and B2M, and predicted primary resistance to anti–CTLA-4, but not anti–PD-1, therapy. Melanoma MHC class II membrane expression on >1% cells was observed in 55 of 181 cases (30%), was associated with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and IFN-γ–mediated gene signatures, and predicted response to anti–PD-1, but not anti–CTLA-4, therapy.
Scott Rodig, MD, PhD, an oncologic pathologist and first author of the study, said, “By looking at how melanoma is avoiding immune detection, we may be able to identify patients who may do just as well with a single agent, with no loss of efficacy, but improved tolerability.”
The authors concluded that primary response to anti–CTLA-4 requires robust melanoma MHC class I expression. In contrast, primary response to anti–PD-1 is associated with preexisting IFN-γ–mediated immune activation that includes tumor-specific MHC class II expression and components of innate immunity when MHC class I is compromised. The study was published on July 18, 2018 in the journal Science Translational Medicine.
Related Links:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Combination anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy promotes antitumor immunity and provides superior benefit to patients with advanced-stage melanoma compared with either therapy alone. Currently, there is no way to predict response to anti–CTLA-4 cancer immunotherapy.
Scientists at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA, USA) and their colleagues examined major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II protein expression on tumor cells from previously untreated melanoma patients and correlated the results with transcriptional and genomic analyses and with clinical response to anti–CTLA-4, anti–PD-1, or combination therapy.
The team found that most (>50% of cells) or complete loss of melanoma MHC class I membrane expression was observed in 78 of 181 cases (43%), was associated with transcriptional repression of HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and B2M, and predicted primary resistance to anti–CTLA-4, but not anti–PD-1, therapy. Melanoma MHC class II membrane expression on >1% cells was observed in 55 of 181 cases (30%), was associated with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and IFN-γ–mediated gene signatures, and predicted response to anti–PD-1, but not anti–CTLA-4, therapy.
Scott Rodig, MD, PhD, an oncologic pathologist and first author of the study, said, “By looking at how melanoma is avoiding immune detection, we may be able to identify patients who may do just as well with a single agent, with no loss of efficacy, but improved tolerability.”
The authors concluded that primary response to anti–CTLA-4 requires robust melanoma MHC class I expression. In contrast, primary response to anti–PD-1 is associated with preexisting IFN-γ–mediated immune activation that includes tumor-specific MHC class II expression and components of innate immunity when MHC class I is compromised. The study was published on July 18, 2018 in the journal Science Translational Medicine.
Related Links:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Latest Immunology News
- Diagnostic Blood Test for Cellular Rejection after Organ Transplant Could Replace Surgical Biopsies
- AI Tool Precisely Matches Cancer Drugs to Patients Using Information from Each Tumor Cell
- Genetic Testing Combined With Personalized Drug Screening On Tumor Samples to Revolutionize Cancer Treatment
- Testing Method Could Help More Patients Receive Right Cancer Treatment
- Groundbreaking Test Monitors Radiation Therapy Toxicity in Cancer Patients
- State-Of-The Art Techniques to Investigate Immune Response in Deadly Strep A Infections
- Novel Immunoassays Enable Early Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome
- New Test Could Predict Immunotherapy Success for Broader Range Of Cancers
- Simple Blood Protein Tests Predict CAR T Outcomes for Lymphoma Patients
- Cell Sorter Chip Technology to Pave Way for Immune Profiling at POC
- Chip Monitors Cancer Cells in Blood Samples to Assess Treatment Effectiveness
- Automated Immunohematology Approaches Can Resolve Transplant Incompatibility
- AI Leverages Tumor Genetics to Predict Patient Response to Chemotherapy
- World’s First Portable, Non-Invasive WBC Monitoring Device to Eliminate Need for Blood Draw
- Predictive T-Cell Test Detects Immune Response to Viruses Even Before Antibodies Form
- Single Blood Draw to Detect Immune Cells Present Months before Flu Infection Can Predict Symptoms