Accuracy Evaluated for Schistosomiasis Tests
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 03 May 2017 |
Image: A photomicrograph of an egg from the parasite Schistosoma mansoni reveals the egg’s characteristic lateral spine, from a stool specimen (Photo courtesy of the CDC).
The unprecedented increase in number of African refugees arriving in Europe is confronting clinicians and general practitioners with the question of whether or not and how to screen migrants from endemic regions for Schistosoma mansoni infection.
Schistosoma mansoni is a significant parasite of humans, a trematode that is one of the major agents of the disease schistosomiasis, which is one type of helminthiasis, a neglected tropical disease. S. mansoni, the cause of intestinal schistosomiasis, is the most widespread of the human-infecting schistosomes, and is present in 54 countries. These countries are predominantly in South America and the Caribbean, Africa including Madagascar, and the Middle East.
Scientists at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and a Dutch colleague assessed the accuracy of three different diagnostic tests for S. mansoni infection: stool microscopy with the samples prepared by sedimentation technique; serology, and a point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) urine cassette test, in 107 newly arrived asymptomatic Eritrean refugees in Switzerland.
The team found that 63 (59%) study participants were tested positive by at least one of the three methods. Thirty-seven participants (35%) were considered to have active schistosomiasis, either due to the detection of parasite eggs in stool and/or the presence of a concordant positive serology and urine POC-CCA test, which the scientists considered to be a suitable surrogate marker of active infection. Of 23 microscopy-positive participants, 22 were positive in serology (95.7% sensitivity) and 21 were positive in the urine POC-CCA test (91.3% sensitivity). The combination of serology and urine POC-CCA testing detected all 23 microscopy-positive study participants (100% sensitivity).
The authors concluded that with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.2-100%), the combination of serology plus urine POC-CCA testing appears to be the most sensitive screening option for asymptomatic S. mansoni infection in Eritrean refugees, when compared to stool sedimentation microscopy which requires the employment of a skilled microscopist. The study was published on April 19, 2017, in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Schistosoma mansoni is a significant parasite of humans, a trematode that is one of the major agents of the disease schistosomiasis, which is one type of helminthiasis, a neglected tropical disease. S. mansoni, the cause of intestinal schistosomiasis, is the most widespread of the human-infecting schistosomes, and is present in 54 countries. These countries are predominantly in South America and the Caribbean, Africa including Madagascar, and the Middle East.
Scientists at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and a Dutch colleague assessed the accuracy of three different diagnostic tests for S. mansoni infection: stool microscopy with the samples prepared by sedimentation technique; serology, and a point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) urine cassette test, in 107 newly arrived asymptomatic Eritrean refugees in Switzerland.
The team found that 63 (59%) study participants were tested positive by at least one of the three methods. Thirty-seven participants (35%) were considered to have active schistosomiasis, either due to the detection of parasite eggs in stool and/or the presence of a concordant positive serology and urine POC-CCA test, which the scientists considered to be a suitable surrogate marker of active infection. Of 23 microscopy-positive participants, 22 were positive in serology (95.7% sensitivity) and 21 were positive in the urine POC-CCA test (91.3% sensitivity). The combination of serology and urine POC-CCA testing detected all 23 microscopy-positive study participants (100% sensitivity).
The authors concluded that with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.2-100%), the combination of serology plus urine POC-CCA testing appears to be the most sensitive screening option for asymptomatic S. mansoni infection in Eritrean refugees, when compared to stool sedimentation microscopy which requires the employment of a skilled microscopist. The study was published on April 19, 2017, in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Latest Microbiology News
- Integrated Solution Ushers New Era of Automated Tuberculosis Testing
- Automated Sepsis Test System Enables Rapid Diagnosis for Patients with Severe Bloodstream Infections
- Enhanced Rapid Syndromic Molecular Diagnostic Solution Detects Broad Range of Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Decision Support Software a Game-Changer in Antimicrobial Resistance Battle
- New CE-Marked Hepatitis Assays to Help Diagnose Infections Earlier
- 1 Hour, Direct-From-Blood Multiplex PCR Test Identifies 95% of Sepsis-Causing Pathogens
- Mouth Bacteria Test Could Predict Colon Cancer Progression
- Unique Metabolic Signature Could Enable Sepsis Diagnosis within One Hour of Blood Collection
- Groundbreaking Diagnostic Platform Provides AST Results With Unprecedented Speed
- Simple Blood Test Combined With Personalized Risk Model Improves Sepsis Diagnosis
- Blood Analysis Predicts Sepsis and Organ Failure in Children
- TB Blood Test Could Detect Millions of Silent Spreaders
- New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours
- New Tuberculosis Test to Expand Testing Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Rapid Test Diagnoses Tropical Disease within Hours for Faster Antibiotics Treatment
- Rapid Molecular Testing Enables Faster, More Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Pneumonia