Molecular Testing Accuracy for Clostridium difficile Scrutinized
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 31 Aug 2016 |
Image: The Mastercycler nexus thermal cycler (Photo courtesy of Eppendorf).
Accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is paramount for patient management and the wrong diagnosis places patients at risk, delays treatment, and/ or contributes to transmission of infection in the healthcare setting.
The selection of diagnostic tests to confirm CDI is controversial because of the variety of laboratory methods that are available and used across various facilities, and lack of standard recommendations for testing. Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive method for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, false negative results still occur and could impact the diagnosis and treatment of this infection.
Scientists at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine (Sudbury, ON, Canada) and their colleagues tested stool samples from patients with diarrhea, and suspected of having CDI, were tested in the diagnostic laboratory for C. difficile using a PCR test and culture techniques. Multiplex PCR was performed on presumptive C. difficile isolates to detect the Toxin A gene (tcdA), Toxin B gene (tcdB), and the triose phosphate isomerase gene (tpi). The reactions were carried out in an Eppendorf Mastercycler nexus thermal cycler (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada).
A total of 2,308 samples were tested for toxigenic C. difficile by GeneXpert C. difficile epi test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and culture methods over a 15-month period. The observed agreement of the results of the two tests was 95.1%. A total of 295 samples tested positive by GeneXpert, while 2,013 samples were negative by GeneXpert. C. difficile isolated from the discrepant samples resulted in diverse ribotyping patterns suggesting they were derived from different strains. The samples belonged to patients who were distributed evenly between age groups and wards in the hospital. In the majority of cases, the false negative C. difficile test results did not seem to impact the clinical outcome in these patients.
The authors concluded that although molecular methods are considered among the most sensitive methods available for clinical diagnosis of CDI, it seems inevitable that some cases, which are positive for C. difficile, might be missed when using this method, or any other method for that matter. Both clinical and analytical sensitivity of C. difficile tests should be considered when deciding which diagnostic assay to use, and clinical correlates should be examined carefully before excluding CDI as a cause of disease. The study was published on August 19, 2016, in the journal BMC Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
Northern Ontario School of Medicine
Fisher Scientific
Cepheid
The selection of diagnostic tests to confirm CDI is controversial because of the variety of laboratory methods that are available and used across various facilities, and lack of standard recommendations for testing. Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive method for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, false negative results still occur and could impact the diagnosis and treatment of this infection.
Scientists at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine (Sudbury, ON, Canada) and their colleagues tested stool samples from patients with diarrhea, and suspected of having CDI, were tested in the diagnostic laboratory for C. difficile using a PCR test and culture techniques. Multiplex PCR was performed on presumptive C. difficile isolates to detect the Toxin A gene (tcdA), Toxin B gene (tcdB), and the triose phosphate isomerase gene (tpi). The reactions were carried out in an Eppendorf Mastercycler nexus thermal cycler (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada).
A total of 2,308 samples were tested for toxigenic C. difficile by GeneXpert C. difficile epi test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and culture methods over a 15-month period. The observed agreement of the results of the two tests was 95.1%. A total of 295 samples tested positive by GeneXpert, while 2,013 samples were negative by GeneXpert. C. difficile isolated from the discrepant samples resulted in diverse ribotyping patterns suggesting they were derived from different strains. The samples belonged to patients who were distributed evenly between age groups and wards in the hospital. In the majority of cases, the false negative C. difficile test results did not seem to impact the clinical outcome in these patients.
The authors concluded that although molecular methods are considered among the most sensitive methods available for clinical diagnosis of CDI, it seems inevitable that some cases, which are positive for C. difficile, might be missed when using this method, or any other method for that matter. Both clinical and analytical sensitivity of C. difficile tests should be considered when deciding which diagnostic assay to use, and clinical correlates should be examined carefully before excluding CDI as a cause of disease. The study was published on August 19, 2016, in the journal BMC Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
Northern Ontario School of Medicine
Fisher Scientific
Cepheid
Latest Microbiology News
- Integrated Solution Ushers New Era of Automated Tuberculosis Testing
- Automated Sepsis Test System Enables Rapid Diagnosis for Patients with Severe Bloodstream Infections
- Enhanced Rapid Syndromic Molecular Diagnostic Solution Detects Broad Range of Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Decision Support Software a Game-Changer in Antimicrobial Resistance Battle
- New CE-Marked Hepatitis Assays to Help Diagnose Infections Earlier
- 1 Hour, Direct-From-Blood Multiplex PCR Test Identifies 95% of Sepsis-Causing Pathogens
- Mouth Bacteria Test Could Predict Colon Cancer Progression
- Unique Metabolic Signature Could Enable Sepsis Diagnosis within One Hour of Blood Collection
- Groundbreaking Diagnostic Platform Provides AST Results With Unprecedented Speed
- Simple Blood Test Combined With Personalized Risk Model Improves Sepsis Diagnosis
- Blood Analysis Predicts Sepsis and Organ Failure in Children
- TB Blood Test Could Detect Millions of Silent Spreaders
- New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours
- New Tuberculosis Test to Expand Testing Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Rapid Test Diagnoses Tropical Disease within Hours for Faster Antibiotics Treatment
- Rapid Molecular Testing Enables Faster, More Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Pneumonia