Combining Two Diagnostic Tests Drastically Reduces Cancer Miss Rates
|
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 17 May 2016 |

Image: A photomicrograph of an abnormal Pap smear showing changes consistent with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Mild Dysplasia. Note the irregular perinuclear cytoplasmic clearing, which is the key characteristic of identifying HPV visually on a Pap smear (Photo courtesy of Dr. Cynthia D Booth, MD).
The Papanicolaou (Pap) test is recommended for women between 21 and 65 years old as a screening test for cervical cancer. Women 30 and older who are negative on co-testing may wait as long as five years for their next testing, but physicians still recommend annual examinations.
In recent years, high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing for triaging atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and co-testing with cytology have been implemented in clinical practice. However, clinical data for primary screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone are currently lacking.
Scientists at the Houston Methodist Hospital (Houston, TX, USA) and their colleagues retrospectively reviewed the correlation of cytology, histology, and hrHPV testing through the use of a cytology laboratory quality assurance database with 130,648 Papanicolaou (Pap) tests interpreted at the BioReference Laboratories (Houston, TX, USA) and Houston Methodist Hospital between March 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014. Among the 47,499 patients who had undergone cytology-HPV co-testing, 1,654 underwent follow-up biopsies.
The sensitivities of the hrHPV and Pap tests were 80.8% and 81.2%, respectively, for detecting any type of cervicovaginal dysplasia and 91.3% and 90.9%, respectively, for high-grade cervicovaginal lesions. For the 253 biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervicovaginal lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+, adenocarcinoma in situ, or carcinoma), the false-negative rates for hrHPV and Pap tests were 8.7% and 9.1%, respectively. When they combined the tests, the teams found only three of the 253 cases were double negatives for both the Pap and hrHPV test. Therefore the false-negative rate for cytology-hrHPV co-testing was only 1.2%.
Dina Mody, MD, director of cytopathology at Houston Methodist Hospital and co-author of the study said, “We have known that neither test is perfect and misses a certain number of cases, but we did not realize until we analyzed the data just how impactful the combination of these tests would be. The numbers tell me that Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists need to regularly offer co-testing, and woman age 30 or older need to proactively request co-testing.” The study was published in the May 2016 issue of the journal Cancer Cytopathology.
Related Links:
Houston Methodist Hospital
BioReference Laboratories
In recent years, high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing for triaging atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and co-testing with cytology have been implemented in clinical practice. However, clinical data for primary screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone are currently lacking.
Scientists at the Houston Methodist Hospital (Houston, TX, USA) and their colleagues retrospectively reviewed the correlation of cytology, histology, and hrHPV testing through the use of a cytology laboratory quality assurance database with 130,648 Papanicolaou (Pap) tests interpreted at the BioReference Laboratories (Houston, TX, USA) and Houston Methodist Hospital between March 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014. Among the 47,499 patients who had undergone cytology-HPV co-testing, 1,654 underwent follow-up biopsies.
The sensitivities of the hrHPV and Pap tests were 80.8% and 81.2%, respectively, for detecting any type of cervicovaginal dysplasia and 91.3% and 90.9%, respectively, for high-grade cervicovaginal lesions. For the 253 biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervicovaginal lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+, adenocarcinoma in situ, or carcinoma), the false-negative rates for hrHPV and Pap tests were 8.7% and 9.1%, respectively. When they combined the tests, the teams found only three of the 253 cases were double negatives for both the Pap and hrHPV test. Therefore the false-negative rate for cytology-hrHPV co-testing was only 1.2%.
Dina Mody, MD, director of cytopathology at Houston Methodist Hospital and co-author of the study said, “We have known that neither test is perfect and misses a certain number of cases, but we did not realize until we analyzed the data just how impactful the combination of these tests would be. The numbers tell me that Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists need to regularly offer co-testing, and woman age 30 or older need to proactively request co-testing.” The study was published in the May 2016 issue of the journal Cancer Cytopathology.
Related Links:
Houston Methodist Hospital
BioReference Laboratories
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Digital PCR Assays Support Surveillance of Bundibugyo Ebolavirus Outbreak
- Updated Guidance Prioritizes Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
- Blood-Based Proteomic Test May Predict Treatment Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Position Statements Outline Evidence Standards for Multi-Cancer Detection Tests
- Ultrasensitive MRD Blood Test Detects Early Breast Cancer Recurrence
- Gene Fusion Patterns May Flag High Risk Solitary Fibrous Tumors
- New RNA Origami Method Supports Faster Targeted Testing for Repeat Expansion Disorders
- FDA Approves Expanded Liquid Biopsy Panel for Advanced Cancer Profiling
- Microbial Saliva Test Could Help Triage Esophageal Cancer Risk
- Expanded DPYD Genotyping Test Supports Safer Chemotherapy Dosing
- Blood Test Detects Early Nonresponse in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- Multi-Omics Profiling Helps Predict BCG Response and Recurrence in Bladder Cancer
- New Computational Tool Reveals Genetic Driver of Idiopathic Neuropathy
- Breast Cancer-Specific Signatures Link Genome Instability to Outcomes
- FDA-Cleared Genomic Profiling Assay Guides Treatment Selection in Solid Tumors
- ctDNA Blood Test Could Help Guide Radiotherapy in Patients with Limited Metastases
Channels
Clinical Chemistry
view channel
Urine-Based Test Shows Promise for Autism Screening in Children
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is commonly diagnosed through behavioral assessments, which can involve long waits that delay intervention. Earlier identification is linked to better developmental outcomes,... Read more
Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers May Improve Childhood Epilepsy Diagnosis
Childhood epilepsy remains a major neurological disorder with unmet needs for accurate, non-invasive biomarkers, as conventional tests such as electroencephalography and neuroimaging can have limited sensitivity... Read moreMolecular Diagnostics
view channel
Updated Guidance Prioritizes Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States and claimed an estimated 55,000 lives in 2026. Incidence is rising among adults younger than 50, even as overall mortality... Read more
Digital PCR Assays Support Surveillance of Bundibugyo Ebolavirus Outbreak
QIAGEN (Venlo, Netherlands) has introduced two custom-designed research-use-only (RUO) QIAcuity dPCR assays to support infectious disease research and surveillance connected to the Bundibugyo ebolavirus outbreak.... Read more
Blood-Based Proteomic Test May Predict Treatment Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. Treatment decisions are often made without a clear indication of how a patient... Read moreHematology
view channel
Next-Generation Hematology Platform Streamlines High-Complexity Lab Workflows
Sysmex America (Chicago, IL, USA) has introduced the next generation XR-Series, centered on the XR-10 Automated Hematology Module for high-complexity laboratories. The platform builds on the widely used... Read more
Blood Eosinophil Count May Predict Cancer Immunotherapy Response and Toxicity
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes across many cancers, yet only a subset of patients derive durable benefit and biomarkers to guide treatment remain limited. Eosinophils, best known for... Read moreImmunology
view channel
Metabolic Biomarker Distinguishes Latent from Active Tuberculosis and Tracks Treatment Response
Tuberculosis (TB) remains the world’s leading infectious killer, with 10.8 million cases and 1.25 million deaths recorded globally in 2023. Yet many infected individuals never develop active disease, underscoring... Read more
Immune Enzyme Linked to Treatment-Resistant Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects nearly 3 million people in the United States and its prevalence continues to rise. Medications that target tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha are widely used, but... Read moreMicrobiology
view channel
Gut Microbiome Signatures Help Identify Risk of IBD Progression
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with highly variable outcomes.... Read more
FDA-Cleared Gastrointestinal Panel Detects 24 Pathogen Targets
Clinical guidelines support testing based on patient presentation in suspected gastrointestinal infections, yet available technologies have often forced laboratories to choose between panels that are too... Read moreTechnology
view channel
Mailed Screening Kits Help Reduce Colorectal Cancer Screening Gaps
Colorectal cancer screening is a longstanding preventive priority, yet participation and follow-up remain uneven across patient groups. Safety‑net primary care settings often face barriers that limit screening... Read more
Algorithm Panel Aids Liver Fibrosis Assessment and Liver Cancer Surveillance
Chronic liver disease is common and often progresses silently, increasing the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma when not detected early. With an estimated 1.5 billion people affected worldwide... Read moreIndustry
view channelWerfen and Oxford Nanopore Collaborate on Transplant Assay Development
Werfen (Barcelona, Spain), a global specialized diagnostics company, has announced a strategic collaboration with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, UK), which develops nanopore-based sequencing technology,... Read more








