LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Cover-Glass Test Differentiates Bacteria

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 23 May 2012
A simple and cost-effective cover-glass test differentiates between micrococci and pathogenic staphylococci in the clinical laboratory.

A cover-glass placed on a heavily inoculated culture plate clearly differentiates facultative anaerobic staphylococci growing underneath the cover-glass after overnight incubation from nongrowing aerobic micrococci.

Medical microbiologists at the Charles University (Prague, Czech Republic) used a study set that included 18 strains of Micrococcus luteus as the most common micrococcal species isolated from clinical specimens and indoor air, 15 strains of Staphylococcus aureus as a significant pathogen, and 20 strains of other staphylococcal species to test the cover-glass method.

To carry out the cover-glass test, a sterile cover-glass was placed with a pair of sterile tweezers onto a heavily inoculated area of the Columbia blood agar plate (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany) with a clinical specimen or bacterial culture and after overnight incubation at 37 °C, the plate was checked for pigmented colonies or bacterial biomass underneath the cover glass.

The result was classified as strongly positive if an unaffected growth was observed beneath the cover glass, moderately positive if the growth was affected and weakly positive if a fine growth occurred. A negative result meant that the strain was not able to grow beneath the coverslip. Each strain was also tested for antibiotic resistance. All S. aureus strains analyzed were positive in the cover-glass test in contrast to the strains from the genus Micrococcus or related genera such as Dermacoccus, Kytococcus, and Kocuria, that remained negative, except for one Kocuria kristinae strain. Seven of 35 staphylococcal strains tested were cover-glass negative.

The cover-glass test proved rapid, highly specific, easy to perform, and easy to interpret. It should be used in combination with the furazolidone and bacitracin disks in both primary and secondary culture as a useful tool for differentiating S. aureus and other staphylococci of human origin from Micrococcus species or related genera. Additional screening tests such as Gram-staining and plasma-coagulase test, and biochemical or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry identification approaches may need to be performed to identify clinical isolates of catalase-positive cocci to the species level. The study was published in the June 2012 issue of the Journal of Microbiological Methods.

Related Links:

Charles University
Merck




Gold Member
Quantitative POC Immunoassay Analyzer
EASY READER+
Online QC Software
Acusera 24•7
New
Chromogenic Culture System
InTray™ COLOREX™ ECC
New
Japanese Encephalitis Test
Japanese Encephalitis Virus Real Time PCR Kit

Latest Microbiology News

Study Finds Hidden Mpox Infections May Drive Ongoing Spread
23 May 2012  |   Microbiology

Large-Scale Genomic Surveillance Tracks Resistant Bacteria Across European Hospitals
23 May 2012  |   Microbiology

Molecular Urine and Stool Tests Do Not Improve Early TB Treatment in Hospitalized HIV Patients
23 May 2012  |   Microbiology



ADLM