Multiplex PCR Panel Evaluated for Diagnosis of Pneumonia
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 28 Jan 2021 |
Image: The BioFire FilmArray 2.0 System set the standard for in-house molecular infectious disease testing. It enables simplified test ordering, faster turnaround times, and optimized laboratory workflow (Photo courtesy of BioFire Diagnostics).
Population based studies in the USA estimate the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia at 250 cases per 100,000 residents/year. At any given time, 1% of hospitalized patients receive treatment for hospital-acquired pneumonia, rendering pneumonia the most common healthcare-associated infection.
Despite potential benefits of achieving a microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia, including identifying resistant pathogens and decreasing antimicrobial utilization, a number of factors limit the value of traditional diagnostics in clinical practice. Guidelines emphasize the need for rapid, cost-effective and accurate diagnostic tests for pneumonia.
Infectious Disease Specialists at the New York University Grossman School of Medicine (New York, NY, USA) prospectively examined sputum specimens submitted to the microbiology laboratory for bacterial culture. From 5/2019 to 1/2020, the list of submitted specimens was reviewed twice daily. Expectorated, induced and tracheal aspirate specimens were considered for inclusion. The pneumonia panel was performed on high-quality sputum specimens and the results were prospectively compared with sputum cultures and other tests performed per standard of care.
The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) was run within 24 hours of patient selection. A cutoff of ≥105 copies/mL was applied for semiquantitative bacterial assays. The panel detects semi-quantitatively 15 bacterial agents to assist with differentiation between colonization and true infection, and qualitatively three atypical bacterial and eight viral agents. Antimicrobial resistance genes including the methicillin resistance genes mecA/C and MREJ, the carbapenemases KPC, NDM, Oxa-48-like, VIM, IMP and the extended spectrum Beta-lactamase CTX-M are also detected.
The scientists reported that 70 patients were included, 69 of whom completed a 5-day antimicrobial course for pneumonia and 14.3% died during hospitalization. There was a trend of higher rate of microbiologic diagnosis among the patients with culture submitted before antimicrobial administration (9/15 versus 20/55). The panel increased the microbiologic diagnosis from 29/70 to 59/70 patients. The per isolate analysis revealed an increase in the isolation of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. On review of empiric antimicrobials, there was potential for antimicrobial optimization in 56/70 patients, including nine bacteria among nine patients, not covered by empiric treatment and another 70 antimicrobials in 49 patients that could have been stopped.
The authors observed a significant increase in the rate of microbiologic diagnosis among adult patients hospitalized with pneumonia where the pneumonia panel was used in addition to current standard of care diagnostic methods, together with abundant opportunities for optimization of antimicrobial therapy. The study was published on January 9, 2021 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
New York University Grossman School of Medicine
BioFire Diagnostics
Despite potential benefits of achieving a microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia, including identifying resistant pathogens and decreasing antimicrobial utilization, a number of factors limit the value of traditional diagnostics in clinical practice. Guidelines emphasize the need for rapid, cost-effective and accurate diagnostic tests for pneumonia.
Infectious Disease Specialists at the New York University Grossman School of Medicine (New York, NY, USA) prospectively examined sputum specimens submitted to the microbiology laboratory for bacterial culture. From 5/2019 to 1/2020, the list of submitted specimens was reviewed twice daily. Expectorated, induced and tracheal aspirate specimens were considered for inclusion. The pneumonia panel was performed on high-quality sputum specimens and the results were prospectively compared with sputum cultures and other tests performed per standard of care.
The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) was run within 24 hours of patient selection. A cutoff of ≥105 copies/mL was applied for semiquantitative bacterial assays. The panel detects semi-quantitatively 15 bacterial agents to assist with differentiation between colonization and true infection, and qualitatively three atypical bacterial and eight viral agents. Antimicrobial resistance genes including the methicillin resistance genes mecA/C and MREJ, the carbapenemases KPC, NDM, Oxa-48-like, VIM, IMP and the extended spectrum Beta-lactamase CTX-M are also detected.
The scientists reported that 70 patients were included, 69 of whom completed a 5-day antimicrobial course for pneumonia and 14.3% died during hospitalization. There was a trend of higher rate of microbiologic diagnosis among the patients with culture submitted before antimicrobial administration (9/15 versus 20/55). The panel increased the microbiologic diagnosis from 29/70 to 59/70 patients. The per isolate analysis revealed an increase in the isolation of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. On review of empiric antimicrobials, there was potential for antimicrobial optimization in 56/70 patients, including nine bacteria among nine patients, not covered by empiric treatment and another 70 antimicrobials in 49 patients that could have been stopped.
The authors observed a significant increase in the rate of microbiologic diagnosis among adult patients hospitalized with pneumonia where the pneumonia panel was used in addition to current standard of care diagnostic methods, together with abundant opportunities for optimization of antimicrobial therapy. The study was published on January 9, 2021 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
New York University Grossman School of Medicine
BioFire Diagnostics
Latest Microbiology News
- Enhanced Rapid Syndromic Molecular Diagnostic Solution Detects Broad Range of Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Decision Support Software a Game-Changer in Antimicrobial Resistance Battle
- New CE-Marked Hepatitis Assays to Help Diagnose Infections Earlier
- 1 Hour, Direct-From-Blood Multiplex PCR Test Identifies 95% of Sepsis-Causing Pathogens
- Mouth Bacteria Test Could Predict Colon Cancer Progression
- Unique Metabolic Signature Could Enable Sepsis Diagnosis within One Hour of Blood Collection
- Groundbreaking Diagnostic Platform Provides AST Results With Unprecedented Speed
- Simple Blood Test Combined With Personalized Risk Model Improves Sepsis Diagnosis
- Blood Analysis Predicts Sepsis and Organ Failure in Children
- TB Blood Test Could Detect Millions of Silent Spreaders
- New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours
- New Tuberculosis Test to Expand Testing Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Rapid Test Diagnoses Tropical Disease within Hours for Faster Antibiotics Treatment
- Rapid Molecular Testing Enables Faster, More Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Pneumonia
- Rapid AST Platform Provides Targeted Therapeutic Results Days Faster Than Current Standard of Care
- New Analysis Method Detects Pathogens in Blood Faster and More Accurately by Melting DNA