Immunoassays Compared to Improve Diagnosis of Chagas Disease
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 26 Oct 2019 |
Image: Indirect hemagglutination test for the detection of antibodies against Trypanosoma cruzi (Photo courtesy of Wiener lab. Group).
Chagas disease (CD), caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, is a vector-borne infection of significant public health concern in Latin America, where nearly six million people are infected and 70 million are at risk of infection.
Up to 99% of CD cases in the Americas and more than 90% in Europe are undiagnosed. A key barrier is the complexity of the diagnostic process, which is hampered by the lack of a gold standard, availability of multiple types of assays with varying sensitivity and specificity, and the sheer difficulty of detecting the parasite in the chronic phase of the disease.
Scientists associated the Colombian National Institute of Health (Bogota, Colombia) used a panel of 501 serum samples obtained from whole blood and the samples reflected a broad spectrum of CD patients in Colombia. Patients ranged in age from 1 to 81, but only seven were under 18 years old. Mean patient age was 39.3 years and was younger in blood donors (22.3) than patients tested in public health laboratories (49.4).
Samples were characterized as positive (n = 256) or negative (n = 245) using standard procedures based on four serological assays: an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), optic density ≥ 0.300; an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA), dilution ≥ 1:32; an indirect hemagglutination; and immunoblots of trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigens.
The scientists assessed seven commercially available assays and found that five of seven assays exhibited sensitivity >98% while six showed specificity >97%. A total antigen ELISA paired with a recombinant assay provided similar performance to the current diagnostic process. Six of six assays tested proved capable of detecting different Trypanosoma cruzi genetic lineages. Of the 501 samples, 85.2% were correctly classified by all seven immunoassays; 222/256 positive samples (86.7%) and 202/245 (83.7%) negative samples.
The authors concluded that their study demonstrated the utility of systematically evaluating T. cruzi assays, using WHO standards, to validate national guidelines for CD diagnosis, strengthen quality control of diagnostic tools, and promote international standardization. A simplified testing process with two commercial assays could perform comparably to the previous process, reducing cost and accessibility barriers and facilitating national scale-up. The study was published in the October 2019 issue of the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
Colombian National Institute of Health
Up to 99% of CD cases in the Americas and more than 90% in Europe are undiagnosed. A key barrier is the complexity of the diagnostic process, which is hampered by the lack of a gold standard, availability of multiple types of assays with varying sensitivity and specificity, and the sheer difficulty of detecting the parasite in the chronic phase of the disease.
Scientists associated the Colombian National Institute of Health (Bogota, Colombia) used a panel of 501 serum samples obtained from whole blood and the samples reflected a broad spectrum of CD patients in Colombia. Patients ranged in age from 1 to 81, but only seven were under 18 years old. Mean patient age was 39.3 years and was younger in blood donors (22.3) than patients tested in public health laboratories (49.4).
Samples were characterized as positive (n = 256) or negative (n = 245) using standard procedures based on four serological assays: an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), optic density ≥ 0.300; an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA), dilution ≥ 1:32; an indirect hemagglutination; and immunoblots of trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigens.
The scientists assessed seven commercially available assays and found that five of seven assays exhibited sensitivity >98% while six showed specificity >97%. A total antigen ELISA paired with a recombinant assay provided similar performance to the current diagnostic process. Six of six assays tested proved capable of detecting different Trypanosoma cruzi genetic lineages. Of the 501 samples, 85.2% were correctly classified by all seven immunoassays; 222/256 positive samples (86.7%) and 202/245 (83.7%) negative samples.
The authors concluded that their study demonstrated the utility of systematically evaluating T. cruzi assays, using WHO standards, to validate national guidelines for CD diagnosis, strengthen quality control of diagnostic tools, and promote international standardization. A simplified testing process with two commercial assays could perform comparably to the previous process, reducing cost and accessibility barriers and facilitating national scale-up. The study was published in the October 2019 issue of the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Related Links:
Colombian National Institute of Health
Latest Microbiology News
- Automated Sepsis Test System Enables Rapid Diagnosis for Patients with Severe Bloodstream Infections
- Enhanced Rapid Syndromic Molecular Diagnostic Solution Detects Broad Range of Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Decision Support Software a Game-Changer in Antimicrobial Resistance Battle
- New CE-Marked Hepatitis Assays to Help Diagnose Infections Earlier
- 1 Hour, Direct-From-Blood Multiplex PCR Test Identifies 95% of Sepsis-Causing Pathogens
- Mouth Bacteria Test Could Predict Colon Cancer Progression
- Unique Metabolic Signature Could Enable Sepsis Diagnosis within One Hour of Blood Collection
- Groundbreaking Diagnostic Platform Provides AST Results With Unprecedented Speed
- Simple Blood Test Combined With Personalized Risk Model Improves Sepsis Diagnosis
- Blood Analysis Predicts Sepsis and Organ Failure in Children
- TB Blood Test Could Detect Millions of Silent Spreaders
- New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours
- New Tuberculosis Test to Expand Testing Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Rapid Test Diagnoses Tropical Disease within Hours for Faster Antibiotics Treatment
- Rapid Molecular Testing Enables Faster, More Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Pneumonia
- Rapid AST Platform Provides Targeted Therapeutic Results Days Faster Than Current Standard of Care