Multigene Testing for Breast Cancer Patients Proves Cost-Effective
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2019 |
Image: Scanning electron photomicrograph (SEM) of breast cancer cells. Unselected, high-risk multigene testing for all patients with breast cancer is extremely cost-effective (Photo courtesy of Marie Thibault).
Health systems in the UK and USA could cost-effectively screen all women with breast cancer for risky germline changes in a handful of breast or ovarian cancer genes, according to a new economic modeling analysis, identifying at-risk individuals who could benefit from additional imaging tests and cancer-reducing interventions.
Knowing a patient’s genetic pathogenic variant status is important for the management and prognosis of breast cancer (BC). After unilateral BC, pathogenic variant carriers can choose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to reduce their risk of developing contralateral BC and opt for surgical prevention of ovarian cancer (OC).
An international team of scientists including those from the Royal London Hospital (London, UK) evaluated the cost-effectiveness and potential health effects of multigene testing in unselected breast cancer patients or in individuals who met current family history- or clinical feature-based criteria. The study was based on data for 11,836 breast cancer patients in the UK, USA, and Australia who were tested for high-risk variants in the BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 genes, together with information on related screening strategies and interventions for those with cancer-related variants in these genes. The investigators concluded that the unselected approach was cost-effective for both payors and society in some 98% to 99% of UK health system simulations and between 64% and 68% of simulations done in the context of the USA health system.
Using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analyses, the team estimated that unselected testing for women with breast cancer would cost the UK health payor £10,464 ($12,966) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained by those tested, while the cost for USA payors would be $65,661 for each additional QALY. The societal cost estimates came in at £7,216 ($8,941) per QALY in the UK and $61,618 per QALY in the USA. The investigators projected that BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 gene testing in all breast cancer patients over one year could translate into 2,101 fewer breast or ovarian cancer cases, for example, and 633 related deaths, in the UK. In the USA, the same analysis suggested that a year of unselected testing could prevent more than 9,700 cancer cases and 2,406 breast or ovarian cancer deaths.
Rosa Legood, PhD, an Associate Professor and co-senior author of the study, said, “Our analysis shows that testing all women with breast cancer for breast and ovarian cancer gene mutations is a more cost-effective strategy which can prevent these cancers in high-risk women and save lives. This approach has important implications given the effective options that are available for breast and ovarian cancer risk management and prevention for women at increased risk.” The study was published on October 3, 2019, in the journal JAMA Oncology.
Related Links:
Royal London Hospital
Knowing a patient’s genetic pathogenic variant status is important for the management and prognosis of breast cancer (BC). After unilateral BC, pathogenic variant carriers can choose contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to reduce their risk of developing contralateral BC and opt for surgical prevention of ovarian cancer (OC).
An international team of scientists including those from the Royal London Hospital (London, UK) evaluated the cost-effectiveness and potential health effects of multigene testing in unselected breast cancer patients or in individuals who met current family history- or clinical feature-based criteria. The study was based on data for 11,836 breast cancer patients in the UK, USA, and Australia who were tested for high-risk variants in the BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 genes, together with information on related screening strategies and interventions for those with cancer-related variants in these genes. The investigators concluded that the unselected approach was cost-effective for both payors and society in some 98% to 99% of UK health system simulations and between 64% and 68% of simulations done in the context of the USA health system.
Using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analyses, the team estimated that unselected testing for women with breast cancer would cost the UK health payor £10,464 ($12,966) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained by those tested, while the cost for USA payors would be $65,661 for each additional QALY. The societal cost estimates came in at £7,216 ($8,941) per QALY in the UK and $61,618 per QALY in the USA. The investigators projected that BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 gene testing in all breast cancer patients over one year could translate into 2,101 fewer breast or ovarian cancer cases, for example, and 633 related deaths, in the UK. In the USA, the same analysis suggested that a year of unselected testing could prevent more than 9,700 cancer cases and 2,406 breast or ovarian cancer deaths.
Rosa Legood, PhD, an Associate Professor and co-senior author of the study, said, “Our analysis shows that testing all women with breast cancer for breast and ovarian cancer gene mutations is a more cost-effective strategy which can prevent these cancers in high-risk women and save lives. This approach has important implications given the effective options that are available for breast and ovarian cancer risk management and prevention for women at increased risk.” The study was published on October 3, 2019, in the journal JAMA Oncology.
Related Links:
Royal London Hospital
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- Blood Proteins Could Warn of Cancer Seven Years before Diagnosis
- New DNA Origami Technique to Advance Disease Diagnosis
- Ultrasound-Aided Blood Testing Detects Cancer Biomarkers from Cells
- New Respiratory Syndromic Testing Panel Provides Fast and Accurate Results
- New Synthetic Biomarker Technology Differentiates Between Prior Zika and Dengue Infections
- Novel Biomarkers to Improve Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes
- RNA-Powered Molecular Test to Help Combat Early-Age Onset Colorectal Cancer
- Advanced Blood Test to Spot Alzheimer's Before Progression to Dementia
- Multi-Omic Noninvasive Urine-Based DNA Test to Improve Bladder Cancer Detection
- First of Its Kind NGS Assay for Precise Detection of BCR::ABL1 Fusion Gene to Enable Personalized Leukemia Treatment
- Urine Test to Revolutionize Lyme Disease Testing
- Simple Blood Test Could Enable First Quantitative Assessments for Future Cerebrovascular Disease
- New Genetic Testing Procedure Combined With Ultrasound Detects High Cardiovascular Risk
- Blood Samples Enhance B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnostics and Prognosis
- Blood Test Predicts Knee Osteoarthritis Eight Years Before Signs Appears On X-Rays
- Blood Test Accurately Predicts Lung Cancer Risk and Reduces Need for Scans