Accuracy of Self-Sampling for HPV Screening Evaluated
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 13 Feb 2019 |
Image: An Evalyn Brush used for patient self-sampling of the cervico-vaginal area (Photo courtesy of Rovers Medical Devices).
Molecular testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) using patient-collected cervico-vaginal samples has shown similar levels of accuracy to testing done on clinician-collected samples and could boost participation in overall HPV screening.
Detecting cancer lesions in women who periodically attend clinics can be more difficult than detecting them in underscreened women who have rarely or never been screened, or have refused to attend clinics following an invitation from a screening organization.
Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) examined 7,643 women aged 29 to 61 years in a self-sampling group and 6,282 in a clinician-collected sampling group. The primary endpoints of the study were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and worse or grade 3 and worse (CIN2+ or CIN3+). The women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush; or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush also from Rovers Medical Devices BV.
All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Of the self-collecting patients, 569, or 7.4%, tested positive for HPV, while in the physician-collected group, 451, or 7.2% tested positive. The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between the two groups, while CIN3+ relative sensitivity was 0.99 with essentially equivalent specificity.
The authors concluded that HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary. Johannes Berkhof, PhD, a professor and a co-author of the study, said, “"Self-collection has potential to become a first screening test in many different countries. It creates a high participation rate, which is difficult to achieve. We have cleared the first hurdle, but now we need to see how we can implement this kind of screening.” The study was published on January 15, 2019, in the journal Lancet Oncology.
Related Links:
Vrije Universiteit
Detecting cancer lesions in women who periodically attend clinics can be more difficult than detecting them in underscreened women who have rarely or never been screened, or have refused to attend clinics following an invitation from a screening organization.
Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) examined 7,643 women aged 29 to 61 years in a self-sampling group and 6,282 in a clinician-collected sampling group. The primary endpoints of the study were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and worse or grade 3 and worse (CIN2+ or CIN3+). The women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush; or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush also from Rovers Medical Devices BV.
All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Of the self-collecting patients, 569, or 7.4%, tested positive for HPV, while in the physician-collected group, 451, or 7.2% tested positive. The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between the two groups, while CIN3+ relative sensitivity was 0.99 with essentially equivalent specificity.
The authors concluded that HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary. Johannes Berkhof, PhD, a professor and a co-author of the study, said, “"Self-collection has potential to become a first screening test in many different countries. It creates a high participation rate, which is difficult to achieve. We have cleared the first hurdle, but now we need to see how we can implement this kind of screening.” The study was published on January 15, 2019, in the journal Lancet Oncology.
Related Links:
Vrije Universiteit
Latest Microbiology News
- Enhanced Rapid Syndromic Molecular Diagnostic Solution Detects Broad Range of Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Decision Support Software a Game-Changer in Antimicrobial Resistance Battle
- New CE-Marked Hepatitis Assays to Help Diagnose Infections Earlier
- 1 Hour, Direct-From-Blood Multiplex PCR Test Identifies 95% of Sepsis-Causing Pathogens
- Mouth Bacteria Test Could Predict Colon Cancer Progression
- Unique Metabolic Signature Could Enable Sepsis Diagnosis within One Hour of Blood Collection
- Groundbreaking Diagnostic Platform Provides AST Results With Unprecedented Speed
- Simple Blood Test Combined With Personalized Risk Model Improves Sepsis Diagnosis
- Blood Analysis Predicts Sepsis and Organ Failure in Children
- TB Blood Test Could Detect Millions of Silent Spreaders
- New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours
- New Tuberculosis Test to Expand Testing Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Rapid Test Diagnoses Tropical Disease within Hours for Faster Antibiotics Treatment
- Rapid Molecular Testing Enables Faster, More Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Pneumonia
- Rapid AST Platform Provides Targeted Therapeutic Results Days Faster Than Current Standard of Care
- New Analysis Method Detects Pathogens in Blood Faster and More Accurately by Melting DNA