We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Residual Disease Test Predicts Merkel Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Earlier Than Antibody Assay

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 24 Jul 2026

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with a substantial risk of relapse, occurring in about 40% of patients. Surveillance remains challenging because widely used serologic monitoring applies only to virus-positive disease and may be less reliable after immunotherapy or multiple recurrences. A new residual disease test now demonstrates earlier and more accurate recurrence prediction than a commonly used antibody assay in a head-to-head study.

Natera’s Signatera test was evaluated against the Merkel cell polyomavirus antibody test (AMERK) in a study published in JAMA Dermatology on July 8, 2026. The analysis compared both methods for predicting recurrence and the time advantage provided before clinical relapse. In this cohort, the Signatera test was identified as a significantly stronger predictor of recurrence and as offering earlier detection.


Image: Signatera is a personalized ctDNA-based MRD assay designed to detect relapse earlier than standard-of-care tools (Photo courtesy of Natera)
Image: Signatera is a personalized ctDNA-based MRD assay designed to detect relapse earlier than standard-of-care tools (Photo courtesy of Natera)

The study was a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter, head-to-head comparison including 169 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. Signatera outperformed AMERK across sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and lead time to recurrence. The test’s clinical validation has been published across all patients regardless of viral status, and it has been included in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines as a recommendation for surveillance monitoring.

Key performance findings included a higher sensitivity for detecting recurrence with Signatera compared with AMERK (90% versus 55%). In patients where both tests identified recurrence, Signatera provided a longer median lead time to detection (5.1 months versus 2.1 months). The difference in predictive strength between the assays was significant (hazard ratio difference 6.6; p < 0.001), indicating improved risk stratification within the study population.

“For years, AMERK had been our best available tool, but its inability to function in virus-negative patients and after immunotherapy has been a recognized limitation. These data demonstrate that Signatera can give clinicians a more precise and earlier signal across all patients, enabling more proactive management of this challenging disease,” said Lisa Zaba, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of dermatology and director of the Merkel cell carcinoma multidisciplinary clinic at the Stanford University School of Medicine and corresponding author of the study.


Platinum Member
Automated Coagulation Analyzer
Hemolumi H6
Gold Member
Automatic Hematology Analyzer
CF9600
New
Automated Immunoassay Analyzer
SuperFlex™
Urine Analyzer
respons® UDS100

Latest Molecular Diagnostics News

Electronic Genome Mapping Reveals Structural Abnormalities in Hematologic Malignancies
23 Jul 2026  |   Molecular Diagnostics

Rare Genetic Variant Linked to Dramatically Higher Lung Cancer Risk
23 Jul 2026  |   Molecular Diagnostics

Multiomic Blood Test Supports Noninvasive Monitoring and Subtyping in Pancreatic Cancer
23 Jul 2026  |   Molecular Diagnostics