We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Medica 2024 Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Rapid Diagnostic Tests Evaluated for Pregnancy Malaria

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 01 Nov 2012
Accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment of pregnancy-associated malaria (PAM) is essential to avert adverse nativity outcomes.

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are an ideal diagnostic complement to microscopy, due to their ease of use and adequate sensitivity in detecting even submicroscopic infections.

Scientists at the National Institute of Medical Research (Tanga, Tanzania) collaborated with other international centers to evaluate the immunochromatographic RDTs under field conditions. A cohort of 924 pregnant women was followed up from enrolment until delivery, and a total of 5,905 samples were collected. Of those, 5,167 venous and 388/650 placental blood samples, for which there were complete RDT and microscopy datasets, were randomly selected for analysis.

The accuracy and reliability of RDTs in diagnosing PAM was evaluated using microscopy and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Venous and placental blood samples evaluated by histidine rich protein 2 (HRP-2) and parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) based RDT Parascreen, (Zephyr Biomedicals; Goa, India) or HRP-2 only RDTs Paracheck Pf (Orchid Biomedical Systems; Mumbai, India) and ParaHITf (Span Diagnostics Ltd.; Surat, India).

Overall 91 of 5,555 (1.6%) samples were positive for malarial parasite antigen based on RDTs, whereas 49 of 5,555 (0.9%) were positive by microscopy. Of the 91 RDT positive samples, 50.5% were microscopy positive, while 49.5% were microscopy negative. To test whether the 45 microscopy negative but RDT positive samples were genuinely negative or false positive, a species diagnostic PCR assay was performed. Intriguingly, 19 of the 45 (42.2%) microscopy negative were positive by PCR and only three samples were positive by microscopy but negative by RDT.

The authors concluded that RDTs outperform expert microscopy in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women. Given the difficulties in establishing reliable microscopy based diagnostic services, RDTs are good alternative for the detection and in the management of malaria infections in pregnant women. RDTs can both be used to detect infections not cleared by intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) or to detect infections where the malaria endemicity is too low to warrant IPTp. The study was published on June 21, 2012, in the Malaria Journal .

Related Links:
Tanzania National Institute of Medical Research
Zephyr Biomedicals
Orchid Biomedical Systems


Gold Member
C-Reactive Protein Reagent
CRP Ultra Wide Range Reagent Kit
Antipsychotic TDM AssaysSaladax Antipsychotic Assays
New
Lab Sample Rotator
H5600 Revolver
New
Gold Member
Syphilis Screening Test
VDRL Antigen MR

Latest Microbiology News

Unique Blood Biomarker Shown to Effectively Monitor Sepsis Treatment

High-Accuracy Bedside Test to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Five Minutes

Innovative Diagnostic Approach for Bacterial Infections to Enable Faster and Effective Treatment