We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Self-Administered HPV Test Helps Screen for Cervical Cancer

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 09 Feb 2012
Patient-collected specimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing detected precancerous cervical lesions with an accuracy comparable to that of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and visual inspection with acetic acid, according to a new study.

Researchers at Peking Union Medical College (PUMC; Beijing, China), Mount Sinai School of Medicine (New York, NY, USA), and other institutions worldwide reviewed patient data from five population-based cervical cancer–screening studies in China. In all, 13,140 participants underwent Self-HPV testing, physician-collected cervical specimens for HPV testing, LBC, and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Screen-positive women had a subsequent colposcopy and confirmatory biopsy. The researchers than analyzed the accuracies of pooled Self-HPV testing, Physician-HPV testing, VIA, and LBC to detect biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe (CIN2+), and CIN3+.

The results showed that 3.9% of the women were diagnosed as CIN2+, 2.1% as CIN3+, and 0.3% with cervical cancer. Self-HPV testing had 86.2% sensitivity and 80.7% specificity for detecting CIN2+, and 86.1% sensitivity and 79.5% specificity for detecting CIN3+. VIA had statistically significantly lower sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ and CIN3+, and higher specificity for detecting CIN2+ and CIN3+ than Self-HPV testing, while LBC had lower sensitivity for detecting CIN2+, similar sensitivity for detecting CIN3+, and higher specificity for detecting CIN2+ and CIN3+ than Self-HPV testing. Physician-HPV testing, on the other hand, was more sensitive for detecting CIN2+ and CIN3+, but similarly specific for detecting CIN2+ and CIN3+ than Self-HPV testing.

“Although it is not specific enough to be a stand-alone test, self-HPV testing provides sensitive results without pelvic exams, medical professionals, or healthcare facilities and thus has the potential to serve as a primary cervical cancer screening method for women, regardless of their geographic location or access to healthcare,” concluded lead author You-Lin Qiao, MD, PhD, of PUMC. “Limited resources can then be focused on the clinical follow up of the smaller percentage of women who tested positive.”

One-seventh of all cervical cancers worldwide occur in China, which lacks a national screening program. Self-collected cervicovaginal specimens tested for HPV DNA could therefore effectively serve as a primary cervical cancer screening method in China and other low-resource settings.

Related Links:
Peking Union Medical College
Mount Sinai School of Medicine


Gold Member
Aspiration System
VACUSAFE
Online QC Software
Acusera 24•7
New
All-in-One Molecular System
AIO M160
New
Benchtop Thermomixer
Biometra TS1 ThermoShaker

Latest Microbiology News

Study Finds Hidden Mpox Infections May Drive Ongoing Spread
09 Feb 2012  |   Microbiology

Large-Scale Genomic Surveillance Tracks Resistant Bacteria Across European Hospitals
09 Feb 2012  |   Microbiology

Molecular Urine and Stool Tests Do Not Improve Early TB Treatment in Hospitalized HIV Patients
09 Feb 2012  |   Microbiology



ADLM