LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo
ADLM 2025
Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Molecular Assays Evaluated for Leprosy

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 24 Oct 2011
The increased reliability and efficiency of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays make them candidates for diagnosing leprosy.

The specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays for the chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae needs to be evaluated as a range of clinical samples could bias the molecular results.

Image: Light micrograph of M. Leprae bacteria (red) in a sample of nasal mucus (Photo courtesy of CNRI).
Image: Light micrograph of M. Leprae bacteria (red) in a sample of nasal mucus (Photo courtesy of CNRI).

Scientists at the Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) used qPCR assays to amplify different M. leprae gene targets and compared them for leprosy differential diagnosis. The qPCR assays were performed on frozen skin biopsy samples from a total of 62 patients: 21 untreated multibacillary (MB), 26 untreated paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, as well as 10 patients suffering from other dermatological diseases and five healthy donors.

The four gene targets were superoxide dismutase (sodA), 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA), the protective antigen Ag 85B and M. leprae repetitive elements (RLEP). The qPCRs were assayed using a 7000 real-time PCR system and fluorescent accumulation data for skin biopsies specimens were analyzed by the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System software (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA; www.appliedbiosystems.com). The scientists found a decreasing sensitivity for Ag 85B (66.1%), 16S rRNA (62.9%), and sodA (59.7%) optimized assay classifiers, but with similar maximum specificity for leprosy diagnosis. Conversely, the RLEP assay showed to be the most sensitive (87.1%). Moreover, RLEP assay was positive for three samples of patients originally not diagnosed as having leprosy, but these patients developed leprosy 5 to 10 years after the collection of the biopsy.

In addition, four other samples of patients clinically classified as non-leprosy presented detectable chromosome counts in their samples by the RLEP assay suggesting that those patients had either leprosy that was misdiagnosed or a subclinical state of leprosy. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that RLEP assay could be useful as a sensitive diagnostic test to detect M. leprae infection before major clinical manifestations. Leprosy still affects 211,903 individuals per year worldwide and lead to permanent nerve injury that is generally associated with late diagnosis. The study was published in October 2011 in the Public Library of Science Neglected Tropical Disease.

Related Links:
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Applied Biosystems



New
Gold Member
Quality Control Material
iPLEX Pro Exome QC Panel
3-Part Differential Hematology Analyzer
Swelab Alfa Plus Sampler
New
8-Channel Pipette
SAPPHIRE 20–300 µL
New
Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Analyzer
MS-i3080

Latest Microbiology News

New Platform Leverages AI and Quantum Computing to Predict Salmonella Antimicrobial Resistance
24 Oct 2011  |   Microbiology

Early Detection of Gut Microbiota Metabolite Linked to Atherosclerosis Could Revolutionize Diagnosis
24 Oct 2011  |   Microbiology

Viral Load Tests Can Help Predict Mpox Severity
24 Oct 2011  |   Microbiology



PURITAN MEDICAL