We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

LabMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Expo ADLM 2025 Clinical Chem. Molecular Diagnostics Hematology Immunology Microbiology Pathology Technology Industry Focus

Flow Cytometry Utilized to Screen Urine Specimens

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 02 Feb 2011
A flow cytometer can be used to screen urine samples rapidly to determine the presence white blood cells and bacteria.

Screening urine by flow cytometry would minimize the number of specimens cultured yet ensuring that all true positives were cultured.The method was used in a study at the University of Manitoba, (Winnipeg, MB, Canada) where 2,496 urine specimens were screened and cultured. Urine specimens were cultured on nonselective differentiation medium and analyzed by the UF-1000i urine fluorescence-flow cytometer. Various combinations of WBC/bacterial counts were assessed as screening criteria and correlated with significant growth on the culture medium.

The urine samples were cultured on CHROMaga Orientation medium (Becton Dickinson, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Of the 2,496 samples of urine cultured, 75% were midstream urine and 25% were catheterized urine. Of the midstream urine specimens, 27.3% grew significant pathogens (SIGs), 68.6% showed nonsignificant growth (NSIG), whereas 4.1% had growth suggestive of possible contamination (PCON). Of the 622 catheter urine samples cultured, 34.2% grew SIGs, 61.2% showed NSIG, whereas 4.6% showed PCON.

The flow cytometer, UF-1000i, is a product of Sysmex (Mississauga, ON, Canada) and it was provided for this study by bioMérieux, (St Laurent, QC, Canada).

A bacterial count equal to or greater than 20 from the flow cytometer (UF) gave an overall screening sensitivity of 92.6%, allowing 35% of specimens to be screened out and not cultured. The sensitivity was 99.2% and 85.0% for Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms, respectively, using the same bacterial count. There were 27 patients with UF false-negative results, but only four had urinary tract infections and were treated using appropriate antibiotics. The authors concluded that the study indicated that UF was a simple, rapid, and reliable method for urine screening when the bacterial count of above 19 was used as the sole screening criterion. The study was published in the February 2010 issue of Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease.

Related Links:

University of Manitoba
BectonDickinson
Sysmex
bioMérieux



New
Gold Member
Cardiovascular Risk Test
Metabolic Syndrome Array I & II
3-Part Differential Hematology Analyzer
Swelab Alfa Plus Sampler
New
Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Analyzer
MS-i3080
New
Silver Member
Quality Control Material
Multichem ID-B

Latest Microbiology News

Early Detection of Gut Microbiota Metabolite Linked to Atherosclerosis Could Revolutionize Diagnosis
02 Feb 2011  |   Microbiology

Viral Load Tests Can Help Predict Mpox Severity
02 Feb 2011  |   Microbiology

Gut Microbiota Analysis Enables Early and Non-Invasive Detection of Gestational Diabetes
02 Feb 2011  |   Microbiology



PURITAN MEDICAL