New Guideline Approved for Evaluation of Between-Reagent-Lot Variation
By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 11 Nov 2013
A document details a new guideline recommended for use by clinical laboratories in their methods for evaluating performance of new reagent lots.Posted on 11 Nov 2013
As changes in measurement procedure performance (MPP) may occur with a change in reagent lot, good laboratory practice includes verification of the consistency of patient sample results when introducing each new lot. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; Wayne, PA, USA) has now published “EP26-A—User Evaluation of Between-Reagent Lot Variation; Approved Guideline,” a document that provides guidance on evaluation of new analytical reagent lots. EP26-A provides laboratory users with a protocol to evaluate the consistency of patient sample results compared to the reagent lot currently in use. It uses patient samples to help users detect significant changes in MPP due to reagent lot changes and to confirm-before-use that patient sample results are consistent between the two lots. Also, although this guideline is intended for the clinical laboratory and does not provide detailed procedures for reagent manufacturers, reagent manufacturers can use this document to understand the types of verification studies that may be performed in their customers’ laboratories.
“Verifying the performance of a new reagent lot is a common task in the laboratory. Since the need to verify a new lot can occur at any time, on any day, and often needs to be accomplished on short notice, the protocol used must be simple and quick,” notes Nils Person, PhD, FACB, document Chairholder of the EP26-A Document Development Committee, and Senior Clinical Consultant at Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. in Flanders (NJ, USA). “To date, there has not been standardized guidance on how best to approach this task. EP26-A provides the needed guidance to verify the performance of a new reagent lot within the practical constraints of the clinical laboratory.”
Related Links:
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute