Blood Test Detects New Breast Cancer Subtype
By LabMedica International staff writers Posted on 14 Sep 2016 |
Image: The QX200 Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain reaction (ddPCR) system (Photo courtesy of Bio-Rad).
A blood test has been developed that detects when the most common form of breast cancer has become resistant to treatment could double the average time it takes for the disease to progress, from around two and a half to around six months.
The test detects mutations to a gene called estrogen receptor 1, or ESR1, which indicate that receptors for the female hormone estrogen in the cancer cells that are usually driven by the hormone have evolved to stay permanently switched on without it which means hormonal treatments that block estrogen production will no longer be effective.
Scientists at the Institute of Cancer Research (London, UK) and their colleagues analyzed blood samples from a total of 783 women enrolled on two major phase III clinical trials of new treatments for advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, which accounts for three quarters of all cases. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Total free DNA was quantified from plasma using RNase P as the reference gene. For ESR1 mutation analysis, the team used commercially available multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays for the seven most common ESR1 mutations. The ddPCR was performed on a QX200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A multiplex assay was considered mutation positive if at least two ESR1 mutant droplets were observed. The results obtained on the multiplex ddPCR were further characterized using uniplex ddPCR assays.
The investigators found that nearly 40% of the 162 patient blood samples available, taken going into the trial, were found to have mutations in the estrogen receptor. These women responded better to fulvestrant, which delayed progression of the disease for 5.7 months, compared to 2.6 months on exemestane. For women without ESR1 mutations both treatments, fulvestrant and exemestane, had the same effectiveness.
The scientists also looked at a second trial that had compared treatment with fulvestrant and a placebo to fulvestrant and palbociclib. They found 25.3 %of patient blood samples had estrogen receptor mutations going into this trial. But because palbociclib targets different molecules, the patients had the same outcomes regardless of whether or not they had the mutation in the estrogen receptor.
Nicholas Turner, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and team leader said, “Our results show that breast cancer with and without ESR1 mutations are distinct subtypes that respond differently to treatment. These subtypes can be diagnosed simply and cheaply from a blood test, and should be considered for future clinical trials of advanced breast cancer to ensure patients are receiving the best treatment for their cancer. For the first time we should able to use a potentially simple test to help us pick the best treatment for women with advanced cancer after their initial treatment has failed. We do need to confirm the results in another trial before we can implement this clinically.” The study was published on September 1, 2016, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Related Links:
Institute of Cancer Research
Qiagen
Bio-Rad
The test detects mutations to a gene called estrogen receptor 1, or ESR1, which indicate that receptors for the female hormone estrogen in the cancer cells that are usually driven by the hormone have evolved to stay permanently switched on without it which means hormonal treatments that block estrogen production will no longer be effective.
Scientists at the Institute of Cancer Research (London, UK) and their colleagues analyzed blood samples from a total of 783 women enrolled on two major phase III clinical trials of new treatments for advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, which accounts for three quarters of all cases. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Total free DNA was quantified from plasma using RNase P as the reference gene. For ESR1 mutation analysis, the team used commercially available multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays for the seven most common ESR1 mutations. The ddPCR was performed on a QX200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A multiplex assay was considered mutation positive if at least two ESR1 mutant droplets were observed. The results obtained on the multiplex ddPCR were further characterized using uniplex ddPCR assays.
The investigators found that nearly 40% of the 162 patient blood samples available, taken going into the trial, were found to have mutations in the estrogen receptor. These women responded better to fulvestrant, which delayed progression of the disease for 5.7 months, compared to 2.6 months on exemestane. For women without ESR1 mutations both treatments, fulvestrant and exemestane, had the same effectiveness.
The scientists also looked at a second trial that had compared treatment with fulvestrant and a placebo to fulvestrant and palbociclib. They found 25.3 %of patient blood samples had estrogen receptor mutations going into this trial. But because palbociclib targets different molecules, the patients had the same outcomes regardless of whether or not they had the mutation in the estrogen receptor.
Nicholas Turner, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and team leader said, “Our results show that breast cancer with and without ESR1 mutations are distinct subtypes that respond differently to treatment. These subtypes can be diagnosed simply and cheaply from a blood test, and should be considered for future clinical trials of advanced breast cancer to ensure patients are receiving the best treatment for their cancer. For the first time we should able to use a potentially simple test to help us pick the best treatment for women with advanced cancer after their initial treatment has failed. We do need to confirm the results in another trial before we can implement this clinically.” The study was published on September 1, 2016, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Related Links:
Institute of Cancer Research
Qiagen
Bio-Rad
Latest Molecular Diagnostics News
- New DNA Origami Technique to Advance Disease Diagnosis
- Ultrasound-Aided Blood Testing Detects Cancer Biomarkers from Cells
- New Respiratory Syndromic Testing Panel Provides Fast and Accurate Results
- New Synthetic Biomarker Technology Differentiates Between Prior Zika and Dengue Infections
- Novel Biomarkers to Improve Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes
- RNA-Powered Molecular Test to Help Combat Early-Age Onset Colorectal Cancer
- Advanced Blood Test to Spot Alzheimer's Before Progression to Dementia
- Multi-Omic Noninvasive Urine-Based DNA Test to Improve Bladder Cancer Detection
- First of Its Kind NGS Assay for Precise Detection of BCR::ABL1 Fusion Gene to Enable Personalized Leukemia Treatment
- Urine Test to Revolutionize Lyme Disease Testing
- Simple Blood Test Could Enable First Quantitative Assessments for Future Cerebrovascular Disease
- New Genetic Testing Procedure Combined With Ultrasound Detects High Cardiovascular Risk
- Blood Samples Enhance B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnostics and Prognosis
- Blood Test Predicts Knee Osteoarthritis Eight Years Before Signs Appears On X-Rays
- Blood Test Accurately Predicts Lung Cancer Risk and Reduces Need for Scans
- Unique Autoantibody Signature to Help Diagnose Multiple Sclerosis Years before Symptom Onset